Topic: Are terrorists only muslim in religion? - page 3. (Read 42412 times)

Most Muslims are violent?!?  Where did you get that idea?

There are 1.8 BILLION Muslims in the world... if most of them were violent, we would ALL be dead by now...

I hear christians are quite violent too... most of the mass murders in America were committed by christians, not muslims (I don't have stats on every country, but US terrorism is 90% christian)

Christians are responsible for The Crusades, The Inquisition, The Dark Ages, The Witch Hunts, and many other violent atrocities

The biggest purveyor of war on this planet is America... a "christian nation"

Out of the last 10 mass shootings in America, how many were committed by a Muslim?  (hint: it's zero)

How many Muslims are shooting Palestinians on a daily basis?  (hint: Jews are shooting Palestinians)

Granted, Saudi Arabia is a Muslim state perpetrating war crimes in Yemen, but they are using US (christian) bombs to do it... so I blame both religions for this one

no religion promote violence and terrorism, not all terrorist are muslims, there are terrorists from other religious background, the reason muslims are labelled terrorist is due to the fact that most muslims are violent. i think some persons who may not be muslims may use the religion's name to carry out attacks.

Fine.  What other (purportedly) state sponsored intelligence or paramilitary organizations besides Mossad use it as their official motto?

Would you assume that an organization who used it as their motto was prone to, or at least no allergic to, using deception as an element of their work?

Some of the 'events' which happen in today world are strongly suspected to be false-flags designed induce an action which benefits Israel.  Some people implicate Mossad.  Would you say that Mossad's having such a motto adds or subtracts from the strength of such a conjecture?

It looks to me as I study this stuff that Mossad is so proud of some of their 'deceptions' that they cannot help but brag about them to a degree, and mostly in a way that leaves little doubt among those who are a little bit sophisticated.  Many 'Jews' are well over this threshold and probably do take a more than a little pride in the work of 'theirs'.  I probably would to if I was no allergic to being a liar, but I was not brought up that way.  At the end of the day, though, 'what comes around goes around' and I doubt that things will end well for those who thought they were so clever and 'chosen.'  Time will tell.

The thing which I see some people missing is that just because one does not use deception and deceit does not mean that they are 'to stupid' to do so or that they don't understand how to do so.  They simply choose not to for one reason or another.  Probably a good 1/4 or the world listens to Netanyahoo spout off and sees exactly what Israel is doing, and how, and is filled with disgust.  Netanyahoo may not realize this and may not believe it when is 'algorithms' people tell him.  That's the impression I get.  He may have a plan for how to deal with this unpleasant reality, but having a plan and having a workable plan are two different things.  Especially since it's probably less than 1/4 of us goyim and well over 1/2 of 'the Jews', and a lot of them are probably as repulsed as I am.

Actually you can find it in many books and places. Certainly in Muslim war methodology and Muslim terrorist methods. In Machiavelli. In The Art of War by Sun Tzu. Etc, etc, etc.

Being a terrorist and spreading worries to fellow human beings is actually contrary to what is taught in Islam.
if there are Muslims who become terrorists because they get teachings that deviate from Islam.
Islam is a religion that teaches goodness like other religions.

'Full spectrum domination' of what us goyim say on the internet is not yet a thing.  Not on this site.  Yet.

--- Again:

May be true, but how many of those attacks were organized in some manner by Zionist centric entities and funded by global banking cartels and/or American tax dollars?  I'd estimate upwards of 90% off-hand.

  "By way of deception thou shalt do war."

The above is supposed to be the motto of the Israeli Mossad for those who do not know.

If this is true, then why do true believers in Islam feel the need to create multiple identities, and under these differing names post nearly identical things to this thread?

Just one more case of Takiyya, right?

In Myanmar, Buddhist monks attacked minority Muslims and forced them to leave Myanmar.
So, we can  call Buddhists to be terrorists! no !
But Bangladeshi monkeys protested. They held a protest rally against Myanmar.

First of all we have to keep our mind clean. Religion came to the world for the welfare of the people.

Anyone who says the Quran advocates terrorism obviously hasn't read its lessons on violence. The permission given in Quran 22:40-41 to fight in self-defense was not only granted to defend Muslims from persecution, but to defend Christians, Jews and people of all faiths from acts of terror like those committed by Isis today. So I don't know why you ask "Are terrorists only muslim in religion?"

We must first understand what is going on in world politics.Take a little bit of attention,  you can understand that most countries in which the war is conducted in America are mostly Muslim countries.
And the terrorism that's there।
xmpl
Afganstan = Taliban
Iraq = ISIS
Syria = Al Nusra etc

These groups have given birth to America. And for those of us we abuse religion . So what we can not say is that America is their main engagement.  

And you see these countries except the countries where Muslims live in peace

Now now. Let's not be making things up.

the question is quite funny
all people, whatever their religion, whether worshiping a god or worshiping a stone, or even an atheist, could have become a terrorist.

yes, there are muslim terrorists and there are also christian, buddhist or any other religion terrorists.

a person can become a terrorist not merely because of religion but because of a "damaged brain" and the loss of a sense of humanity

I think when brand new members come to this thread, which is obviously geared toward fomenting anti-Muslim sentiment, there is a good chance that they are bots and/or part of a pretty common family of psychological operations.  Most such operations are 'Jewish' in nature.  'Jews' being so clever and all.

I think that the mistake that we see Muslims as ordinary people 

May be true, but how many of those attacks were organized in some manner by Zionist centric entities and funded by global banking cartels and/or American tax dollars?  I'd estimate upwards of 90% off-hand.

  "By way of deception thou shalt do war."

Because Muslims have carried out over 33,000 terror attacks since 9/11.

Why do people connect terrorism with muslims? It was not so long away when I think in Norway one man in the name of Cristianity killed 40 muslim's children . Whell the children did not even know what is terrorism. It is problem in head for any religion 

Only Muslims can be terrorists. Or people who converted to Islam, but originally from another religion. The reason is that Islam has two directions in religion. Peaceful and radically directed. It is the Muslim who is most easily persuaded to accept the aggressive direction of his religion.

If Hitler,Mussolini are Muslim,,,then you can say terrorists are only in Muslim.....
When a christian,,Hindu,,and other religion person make those type of incident,,nobody are taking about their religion..But,,if those incident is happens by a  Muslim people ,,then all are start to bl-aim the whole Muslim community....What a stupidity is it..!!!

Almost everyone's manifesto is mostly 'good points'.  I don't recall whether I made it through Kaczynski's manifesto or not in times past.  Just now I read a few pages.  I'm a person who can agree with points and come up with counter-points simultaneously and in spite of mild dyslexia this came unusually naturally to me with almost every sentence the guy wrote.

I'll bet that I do see a lot of things similarly to Kaczynski, but I do recall that accd to the man himself he was 'triggered' to go homicidal by someone building a road in 'his' favorite spot (for which he could produce neither of title nor tax receipts.)  As far as I'm concerned that alone makes someone a 'religious' nut, a creep, and a psycho.

Interesting thing about Kaczynski is that while at Harvard he participated in the government's MKULTRA program as a test subject.  One activity was that he was to write a manifesto and defend it.  The experimenter would then use various "purposely brutalizing psychological" methods to refute the manifesto.  The fact that Kaczynski ended up doing what he did tells me that the mechanics of Mind Kontrolle are pretty well advanced when professionals get serious about it, and they have been for quite a long time.