Author

Topic: Are these enough proofs to tag this HIGH RANK ring? Need DT opinions - page 2. (Read 746 times)

andulolika

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 1047

Pretext to put on the rating? You mean all those accounts you linked up shall go negative?
Edit: Said and done, each account I seen up there got it's rating with the reference and comment leading here, you the proof guy, will remove if you mistaken any.

elda34b

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 351

Those are some serious proofs. I think it's more than enough. Seems like they're a gang tbh, using multiple accounts to abuse lots of things. Their address looks pretty much connected imo, not just casual "shared deposit wallet".

coinlocket$

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1517

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Adding even more alts same btc address in the same "Let's Think About the Future Signature Campaign (All Ranks Welcome)" signature https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lets-think-about-the-future-signature-campaign-all-ranks-welcome-1560376 Roll Eyes

Account: Casanova18

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18943827

Quote from: Lampaster on July 19, 2018, 05:06:18 AM

Bitcointalk Username: Lampaster
Rank: SR Member
Current post count: 612
BTC Address: 34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89
Wear appropriate signature : Yes
Wear avatar : Yes

http://archive.fo/tzwVc#selection-7913.13-7906.7

Account: ValeryBark

Quote from: Proton2233 on July 19, 2018, 04:59:27 AM

Bitcointalk Username: Proton2233
Rank: SR Member
Current post count: 815
BTC Address: 3HDWQDS82Hnz7oCQBKRzuutiDqmZoXrp6c
Wear appropriate signature : Yes
Wear avatar: Yes

http://archive.fo/SacjR#selection-8279.13-8272.7

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18930188

Quote from: sindikat on July 19, 2018, 05:47:18 AM

Btctalk name: Coffee135
Rank: Full member
Current post count:665
BTC address: 3CP6yJ3ARGi3g7daiPmBnPGCHVZG1v3sVX
Wear appropriate signature: yes
Wear avatar: yes

Note: he "casually" posted as coffee135
http://archive.fo/gvW4i#selection-4189.13-4182.7

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18823923

Quote from: suchmoon on August 15, 2018, 08:22:54 PM

Quote from: Hexah on August 15, 2018, 05:41:26 PM

Okay it was, but on the way it was sent and have same time logs

This is a shared wallet. Multiple users deposit to their assigned addresses then some process probably sweeps it to another address. So it's very likely for the timestamps to match but that doesn't prove anything.

Quote from: Hexah on August 15, 2018, 05:41:26 PM

, the way they have synonymous date registry although other 2 haven't, the way that these users are cycling out there merits and the way that Palmerson merited Lieldoryn post on 12th of August because of the merit requirements in the BQT campaign. Right now those account has been waked up from long sleep on July 19 maybe this post has been seen.

Sending or receiving merits doesn't prove anything.

Yes this is a multiply shared wallet and casually is used on the signatures application thread bounties only from these users on the same day, not a day before or after only the day when 1 of them apply for a signature (more than 75% only on yahoo's signatures) they all apply.

Sending merit is not a proof, but over 90% of merit send only between them is not casual.

coinlocket$

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1517

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

2 More possible alt

Lieldoryn

BPIP https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lieldoryn
PROFILE https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lieldoryn-922880
ADDRESS 374Wfo9kLKkc1vxzifqGiqcqH55KbGuuPx https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49406993 also on XAPO.COM WALLET
archivie: http://archive.fo/eMYRc

Infos: applied here with many others account of the ring

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20795442
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19806384
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18820837

Lancusters

BPIP https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lancusters
PROFILE https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lancusters-926910
ADDRESS 3QQXvjuPHYkfaDis5354PBQR7AbA9duKcz https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47710806 also on XAPO.COM WALLET
archivie: http://archive.fo/cFTmI

Infos: applied here with many others account of the ring

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21302775
probably alt.

3 accounts of the ring got merits form 1Referee and it seems a coincidence http://loyce.club/Merit/history/308793.html
Added the others 2 probable alts on the script to check transactions
updating the transactions list

Quote from: Hexah on August 13, 2018, 12:12:08 AM

Now let's get through on their addresses and image proofs:

Here you'll notice that Lieldoryn, Palmerson and Lampaster's btc address ( 374Wfo9kLKkc1vxzifqGiqcqH55KbGuuPx, 3M5vCnvWYVT6v7g57TRa1x8ZH7eAc8GuGB, and 34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89 ) have same time log when they have sent some btc to the address 3C4ABC7iPcAAKBh6SJXfvUSDBew3abCtw3 and the other address you can find on the screenshot.

In this image you can see that Lampaster and Kronos btc address has same time log and same address used and sent out btc to 3C4ABC7iPcAAKBh6SJXfvUSDBew3abCtw3 (I guess same too on the screenshots above)

In this image you can see that Lampaster and warrior333 btc address has same time log and same address used and sent out btc to 3PbacVZwS2L5i9C2Cmz9rPu8s4qjyYkufk and 3CgQeSxqroG8obuiMwFQpZCzSBuhW4FDAP namely.

In this image you can see that Palmerson, Basmic and matuson btc address has same time log and same address used sent out btc to 37Kbnc7dkB8AiqGfGHgeqKkgd3C65EwqE9

In this image you can see that Lampaster and Lancuster btc address has no same time log but they use same address and sent out btc to 33jhmQXe4Q9dP24Jm9EVa6XHxn85sZnQMR but base on both of their account name I guess it could be valid base on on the rhyme factor.

In this image you can see that Proton2233 and matuson btc address has only 168 seconds gap between the transaction and they sent out btc to 3NSAY3HF6Afd4KyEoYUiQdkJFLfr4E7ubj

EDIT: Palmerson has merited Lancuster in this post.
http://archive.is/uM9rS#10%

User matuson, Lampaster, Proton223, and Palmerson has short gaps only when they have been created by May 11, 2017. User Basmic and warrior2233 has only a 3 minutes gap when it was created May 10, 2017. The other three has different date registry.

As you can see matuson, Proton2233, Lancusters, warrior333 and Basmic was last active by July 19, 2018. And base on the accounts by now just 4 of them are active namely Lampaster, Palmerson, (who merited one of the post of Lieldoryn maybe because of merit requirements in the BQT campaign that has been posted on August 10 and by August 12 he/she receives that merit) Lieldoryn and Kronos21.

I guess that should all be fine and hoping those members will be tagged so soon but I agree on due process.

*This will be my thread from now on for reporting forum abuse so that it will not be spammy on Reputation section, take this as a rehab of mine of what did I do based on my red TRUST but that will be my motivation too. Let's keep the forum clean

coinlocket$

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1517

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Hello, I was looking on Yahoo's signature and I found what it seems and abusers ring.

I will post what I can, I think we need to tag those accounts even if a solid proof is not found so far.

The strange and almost impossible thing is that they applied in consecutive posts in a lot of yahoo's signatures, I think this can't be a coincidence, see proof sections.

10+2 probable on post#2 so far Account connected?
Lampaster
matuson
Palmerson
Proton2233
Basmic
warrior333
JerryJam
Coffee135
sindikat
Kronos21

Proof:

Every single address on post #1 is on XAPO.COM WALLET https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Xapo.com/addresses

Mozo bounty

Lampaster https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42467777
matuson https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42469419
Palmerson https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42466716
Proton2233 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42467396
Basmic https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42468685
warrior333 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42468479
JerryJam
Coffee135
sindikat https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42469911
Kronos21 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42468174

NOTE
He copypasted wrong

The 1st address used by coffee135 was used by another one, afer few bounties coffee135 changed his address

Quote from: Lancusters on October 10, 2017, 10:22:44 AM

Btctalk name: Lancusters
Rank: SR Member
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lancusters-926910
BTC Address: 3LXG9g549mL2L1khQmvrj4freY3ZEh6Jjd
Email used to signup at Brickblock: [email protected]

Quote from: Coffee135 on August 29, 2017, 03:18:36 AM

Bitcoin Username: Coffee135
Bitcointalk Rank: Member
Current number of posts: 144
Bitcoin Address to send the payment: 3LXG9g549mL2L1khQmvrj4freY3ZEh6Jjd

and here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27432230

So what now? we can look at this Lancusters merit history and surpise

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lancusters

Related Addresses:

Code:

34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89
36TeFLUM41JJ45oGJbvqNT7kdfdMcs2oYs
3M5vCnvWYVT6v7g57TRa1x8ZH7eAc8GuGB
3HDWQDS82Hnz7oCQBKRzuutiDqmZoXrp6c
3HXNrUxVcB6WQ8V5iuHrhKg188br8L6pyr
3NcnXBrvmG6tWKjqFwizkJw2a6jWBA5znk
3NEoafsrbmZPADweQvy8HMkMmP7UrD4bs
38AeXEUdYsf8jJsTgYuqCxtAuFKgoyUi5b
3CP6yJ3ARGi3g7daiPmBnPGCHVZG1v3sVX
3Mp8nz913V9YJGWfd4SD6E51jB4XYLD7uK

Miscellaneous:

_________________________________________	_____________________	________________________________________________	___________________
BTC	ACCOUNTlink	BTC on forum	ARCHIVE
34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89	Lampaster	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42467777	http://archive.fo/tzwVc#selection-7913.13-7906.7
36TeFLUM41JJ45oGJbvqNT7kdfdMcs2oYs	matuson	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42469419	http://archive.fo/3Dtru#selection-2171.13-2164.7
3M5vCnvWYVT6v7g57TRa1x8ZH7eAc8GuGB	Palmerson	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42466716	http://archive.fo/gvW4i#selection-4189.13-4182.7
3HDWQDS82Hnz7oCQBKRzuutiDqmZoXrp6c	Proton2233	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42467396	http://archive.fo/SacjR#selection-8279.13-8272.7
3HXNrUxVcB6WQ8V5iuHrhKg188br8L6pyr	Basmic	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42468685	http://archive.fo/emOCM#selection-1509.13-1502.7
3NcnXBrvmG6tWKjqFwizkJw2a6jWBA5znk	warrior333	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42468479	http://archive.fo/p8OOL#selection-587.14-580.7
3NEoafsrbmZPADweQvy8HMkMmP7UrD4bs	JerryJam	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28976797	http://archive.fo/jfC8N#selection-5107.17-5100.7
38AeXEUdYsf8jJsTgYuqCxtAuFKgoyUi5b	Coffee135	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28979121	http://archive.fo/vLzg7#selection-5911.14-5904.7
3CP6yJ3ARGi3g7daiPmBnPGCHVZG1v3sVX	sindikat	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42466716	http://archive.fo/gvW4i#selection-4189.13-4182.7
3Mp8nz913V9YJGWfd4SD6E51jB4XYLD7uK	Kronos21	https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42468174	http://archive.fo/Gob7S#selection-8059.13-8052.7

Adding more proofs

Getting the merit history now for all of them FROM http://loyce.club/Merit/usernames.html
I Will color in red the knowed ring so far.

Sent by Lampaster from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Sun Aug 12 12:04:42 2018: 10 to Lieldoryn (history) for Re: How Long Crypto market will take to recover?
Wed Mar 7 14:37:25 2018: 3 to Coffee135 (history) for Re: do you guys pay Taxes for profit?
Received by Lampaster from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Thu Mar 8 13:14:26 2018: 5 from Basmic (history)for Re: Crypto threaten,s Bank of America?

Sent by matuson from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Wed Mar 7 11:29:23 2018: 1 to JerryJam (history) for deleted post
Wed Mar 7 10:42:56 2018: 2 to Basmic (history) for Re: [2018-03-05] Australia’s Tax Office Targets Bitcoin Investors
Thu Mar 1 11:05:32 2018: 1 to Proton2233 (history) for Re: Cryptocurrency
Fri Feb 2 16:44:24 2018: 1 to Lancusters (history) for Re: Legal ramifications of the Lightning Network
Tue Jan 30 14:03:38 2018: 1 to Kronos21 (history) for Re: Legalizing Bitcoin
Received by matuson from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Thu Feb 1 12:35:10 2018: 1 from warrior333 (history)for deleted post
Wed Jan 31 20:50:53 2018: 1 from Lieldoryn (history)for Re: Bitcoin could loose 90% of its value
Wed Jan 31 19:08:11 2018: 1 from Lancusters (history)for Re: [2018-01-30] Samsung Enters `Mass Production` of ASIC Miners
Wed Jan 31 17:01:44 2018: 1 from Basmic (history)for Re: [2018-01-30] Samsung Enters `Mass Production` of ASIC Miners
Sun Jan 28 13:42:39 2018: 1 from 1Referee (history)for Re: 10.000 $ still remain a strong support. Trend is not changed yet.

Sent by Palmerson from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Sun Aug 12 12:52:07 2018: 7 to (history) for Re: Dethrone Bitcoin? Nope not now!
Sun Aug 12 12:37:56 2018: 5 to Lieldoryn (history) for Re: How Long Crypto market will take to recover?
Thu Mar 8 14:55:56 2018: 5 to JerryJam (history) for Re: Crypto threatens Bank of America?
Wed Mar 7 13:14:42 2018: 5 to Lancusters (history) for Re: Is banking still important in the bitcoin era?
Thu Feb 15 17:09:08 2018: 1 to JerryJam (history) for deleted post
Received by Palmerson from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Sat Mar 3 12:32:58 2018: 1 from Lieldoryn (history)for Re: Bitcoin and not Paying Taxes
Thu Mar 1 21:01:12 2018: 1 from Coffee135 (history)for Re: KYCs (Know your Client) is killing crypto
Thu Mar 1 17:29:40 2018: 1 from Kronos21 (history)for Re: Countries with weak economies can use cryptocurrency instead the dollars.
Thu Mar 1 16:40:51 2018: 1 from warrior333 (history)for Re: What is the most profitable coin for mining?
Sun Jan 28 14:25:14 2018: 1 from Don Pedro Dinero (history)for Re: Yamada deki store trialing to accept bitcoin!

Sent by Basmic from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Thu Mar 8 13:14:26 2018: 5 to Lampaster (history) for Re: Crypto threatens Bank of America?
Wed Jan 31 17:01:44 2018: 1 to matuson (history) for Re: [2018-01-30] Samsung Enters `Mass Production` of ASIC Miners
Received by Basmic from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Wed Apr 11 11:25:49 2018: 1 from 1Referee (history)for Re: Cryptocoins are in a recovering mode
Wed Mar 7 10:42:56 2018: 2 from matuson (history)for Re: [2018-03-05] Australia’s Tax Office Targets Bitcoin Investors
Tue Mar 6 14:01:40 2018: 1 from Coffee135 (history)for Re: [2018-03-05] Australia’s Tax Office Targets Bitcoin Investors
Wed Feb 28 20:55:33 2018: 1 from warrior333 (history)for deleted post
Wed Feb 28 15:26:10 2018: 1 from Lancusters (history)for Re: eliminate fake news

Sent by warrior333 from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Thu Mar 1 16:40:51 2018: 1 to Palmerson (history) for Re: What is the most profitable coin for mining?
Wed Feb 28 20:55:33 2018: 1 to Basmic (history) for deleted post
Thu Feb 1 12:35:10 2018: 1 to matuson (history) for deleted post
Received by warrior333 from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Sat Jun 16 17:01:03 2018: 2 from PeaMine (history)for Re: Where to trade Bitcoin to USD bank deposits properly for mining company
Thu Feb 15 16:12:07 2018: 1 from Lancusters (history)for Re: Spamming low level FUD - against the rules or not?

Sent by JerryJam from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Received by JerryJam from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Thu Mar 8 14:55:56 2018: 5 from Palmerson (history)for Re: Crypto threatens Bank of America?
Wed Mar 7 11:29:23 2018: 1 from matuson (history)for deleted post
Thu Mar 1 14:01:56 2018: 1 from Proton2233 (history)for Re: What happens if bitcoin price falls below the cost of mining it?
Wed Feb 28 13:13:46 2018: 1 from Lieldoryn (history)for deleted post
Mon Feb 19 17:15:25 2018: 1 from Coffee135 (history)for Re: Why not compare Bitcoin with money?
Thu Feb 15 17:09:08 2018: 1 from Palmerson (history)for deleted post
Tue Jan 30 17:01:00 2018: 1 from Lancusters (history)for Re: "Switzerland wants to be a crypto nation" Economic minister.

Sent by Coffee135 from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Tue Apr 17 16:29:05 2018: 1 to sindikat (history) for Re: A coin with a floating supply. Is it possible?
Fri Mar 9 15:02:00 2018: 6 to Lieldoryn (history) for Re: Why is Bitcoin price tanking down? There seems to be no respite in the pricing?
Tue Mar 6 14:01:40 2018: 1 to Basmic (history) for Re: [2018-03-05] Australia’s Tax Office Targets Bitcoin Investors
Thu Mar 1 21:01:12 2018: 1 to Palmerson (history) for Re: KYCs (Know your Client) is killing crypto
Mon Feb 19 17:15:25 2018: 1 to JerryJam (history) for Re: Why not compare Bitcoin with money?
Received by Coffee135 from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Sat May 5 13:02:43 2018: 29 from Lancusters (history)for Re: Graphic Card for Bitcoin Mining?
Tue Apr 17 05:12:58 2018: 1 from Hydrogen (history)for deleted post
Mon Apr 2 13:06:29 2018: 1 from 1Referee (history)for Re: [ASK] How are you going to handle too much debt?
Wed Mar 7 14:37:25 2018: 3 from Lampaster (history)for Re: do you guys pay Taxes for profit?
Fri Feb 2 13:41:02 2018: 1 from RodeoX (history)for Re: Will people pay taxes for bitcoin ?
Tue Jan 30 17:16:07 2018: 1 from Lancusters (history)for Re: Cryptocurrency Banks: needed?
Sat Jan 27 14:53:05 2018: 1 from Oceat (history)for Re: Will people pay taxes for bitcoin ?

Sent by sindikat from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Thu Mar 1 16:12:13 2018: 1 to Kronos21 (history) for deleted post
Thu Mar 1 16:03:29 2018: 1 to Proton2233 (history) for Re: What is your Bitcoin "Normal" price???
Received by sindikat from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Tue Apr 17 16:29:05 2018: 1 from Coffee135 (history)for Re: A coin with a floating supply. Is it possible?
Wed Mar 7 11:57:49 2018: 5 from Lieldoryn (history)for Re: BTC and XMR

Sent by Kronos21 from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Thu Mar 1 17:29:40 2018: 1 to Palmerson (history) for Re: Countries with weak economies can use cryptocurrency instead the dollars.
Received by Kronos21 from January 24, 2018 until March 01, 2019
Tue Mar 6 14:55:36 2018: 1 from Lancusters (history)for Re: Capitalism
Sun Mar 4 21:03:00 2018: 1 from mrcash02 (history)for Re: Marshall Island will be using crypto as its legal tender
Thu Mar 1 16:12:13 2018: 1 from sindikat (history)for deleted post
Wed Feb 28 11:23:20 2018: 1 from Proton2233 (history)for Re: Is Bitcoin a Good Investment at Today's High Price?
Tue Jan 30 14:03:38 2018: 1 from matuson (history)for Re: Legalizing Bitcoin