Are these posts deserve so much merits ???

hotforblockchain

member

Activity: 266

Merit: 26

Quote from: Piggy on July 17, 2018, 02:59:17 AM

Quote from: digaran on July 17, 2018, 02:32:39 AM

meriting garbage posts with 50 or 31 or 27 is a blatant merit abuse.

Yes that is clear, but that i can think of, they get no advantages whatsoever till they rank up and their merit history is always going to be visible.

I am relatively new here but I have already noticed some other huge merit senders and i i agree with the author of this post, that this kind of merit transactions are outrageous.
I have been thinking of posting something similar about some " interesting" merit transactions but i have not yet thought of effective an good way to show these transactions.

And here is merit database which was made by other user :
https://fusiontables.google.com/DataSource?docid=1wM2Op6_ol8_0iP0sDEemIGr9weKvIeLPvKsKMpFy#rows:id=1
That means than merit history is going to be visible forever.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Gdra467 on July 18, 2018, 05:12:31 AM

I suggest that merit sources and/or moderators be given a special autonomy to review "huge" number of merits before these merits are awarded to the beneficiaries. For example: merits above 5 could be reviewed and deemed appropriate by moderators/merit sources before they are approved and "dispatched". It's definitely going to an arduous task trying to create a link between two accounts involved in a merit abuse. It is better to make sure it doesn't happen at all.

I would prefer that merit abusers spend their abusive merits as quickly as possible in 20s or 50s or whatever, and the problem will solve itself. These are still mostly airdrop merits. They are unlikely to earn new ones, not in such amounts anyway.

Anyone should be able to spend their merits any way they see fit, short of PROVABLE misconduct, such as sending merit between alts. There is already a limit of 50 per user per month - if that seems too high we can petition theymos to reduce it but at this time I don't see a particular need to do so.

xtraelv

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1926

฿ear ride on the rainbow slide

Quote from: Gdra467 on July 18, 2018, 05:12:31 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on July 17, 2018, 09:37:51 PM

Quote from: Gdra467 on July 17, 2018, 09:08:00 PM

nip

How?

I suggest that merit sources and/or moderators be given a special autonomy to review "huge" number of merits before these merits are awarded to the beneficiaries. For example: merits above 5 could be reviewed and deemed appropriate by moderators/merit sources before they are approved and "dispatched". It's definitely going to an arduous task trying to create a link between two accounts involved in a merit abuse. It is better to make sure it doesn't happen at all.

It really doesn't matter. The worst abusers will get tagged by the DTs

If they are a shitposter their account will eventually get banned and all the merit is gone.

If they are not a shitposter then it probably doesn't matter that much.

Eventually all the big airdropped merit will be gone and the merit process will work like it is designed.

DdmrDdmr

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 10802

There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain

Quote from: Gdra467 on July 18, 2018, 05:12:31 AM

<…>

Moderators are busy enough as it is. They are not going to really pursue merit abuse on it’s own, since there are no clear explicit rules on the matter in terms of prohibition. People can red tag the cases, but that is about the extent of it. The same goes for Merit Sources really.
Anyhow, if you place a limit of 5 sMerits per TX for scrutiny to take place, then merit abusers will just do it by means of more TX of less amount per TX, so to stay under the radar.

Gdra467

newbie

Activity: 137

Merit: 0

Quote from: suchmoon on July 17, 2018, 09:37:51 PM

Quote from: Gdra467 on July 17, 2018, 09:08:00 PM

nip

How?

I suggest that merit sources and/or moderators be given a special autonomy to review "huge" number of merits before these merits are awarded to the beneficiaries. For example: merits above 5 could be reviewed and deemed appropriate by moderators/merit sources before they are approved and "dispatched". It's definitely going to be an arduous task trying to create a link between two accounts involved in a merit abuse. It is better to make sure it doesn't happen at all.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Gdra467 on July 17, 2018, 09:08:00 PM

nip

How?

Gdra467

newbie

Activity: 137

Merit: 0

Tragically, others can argue that these posts were awarded their merits fairly. There is no way to measure 'quality' universally but most of us might deem some posts not worthy of the merits they've been awarded. We can only report and just "hope" we make a case. In my opinion these posts don't deserve a single merit. People will always skirt around new rules. Initially I thought merits should not come so easily but some of these reports at the meta section make me think otherwise. Let's help to collectively nip such abuses in the bud.

xtraelv

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1926

฿ear ride on the rainbow slide

Quote from: digaran on July 17, 2018, 12:43:35 PM

Yes I agree with you not. giving somebody 20 merits is not an excuse, it's simply being lazy ass merit source, or giving 5 merits to every single post you come across and like is also being lazy.
That's on you, if you want to keep meriting people like that. but sending merits to ANN threads or garbage posts is not OK. again this might be another of many double standards of our dear DT members. if some of the DT members have tagged people for similar merit transactions they should tag them all especially after they get to know about such cases.

It really depends on your interpretation. I recently got 50 merits for a post here: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk

I was really pleased. Not so much about the merits themselves - but who it was from !

I make no secret of the fact that I am interested in crypto exchanges and have investments in DEX technology.

This dude chatted with Satoshi on here this forum and ran the second fiat (cash) for BTC exchange service in 2010 !

It is quite upsetting seeing ANN threads getting up in the merit rankings for what I see as the cause of the spam in the first place.I complained about that here: Should ANN and services threads be excluded from the merit system ?

It is nice to see when some topics that I care about make it on the top merited lists so more people get to read it.

coinlocket$

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1517

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: Jet Cash on July 16, 2018, 01:32:54 PM

Well I could give 50 merits to a post, but I can't conceive of one that is worth that much. I've only found half a dozen that I've awarded with 5. I think I gave 10 to seoinc, but that was for him to make some awards in the Spanish community.

What post would be worth 50 merits?

So far I've found only 1 post worth as 50 merit or even more.
A free, hand made 110 pages book about Bitcoin.
This one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.33319420

friends1980

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1059

nutildah-III / NFT2021-04-01

Quote from: digaran on July 17, 2018, 02:32:39 AM

These are blatant misuse of merits and they should be punished, maybe they're alt accounts of DT members and that's why they are not receiving any negative trust? nobody knows. meriting garbage posts with 50 or 31 or 27 is a blatant merit abuse.

You invent new rules, you will see yourself confronted with people who find ways to avoid these rules.

Satoshi could tell you all about this.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: BestSSS on July 17, 2018, 01:50:10 PM

People spread masterpieces and do not get even 1 point

I have reviewed your post history and couldn't find any such masterpieces. Do you have any examples?

ippolits

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: BestSSS on July 17, 2018, 01:50:10 PM

People spread masterpieces and do not get even 1 point - and here corruption on the face - it is necessary to take away ranks from such donors of merits!

I do not think there in any function in SMF to remove rank from a member all together. Banning is the only solution.

BestSSS

jr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 4

Turning the forum into a trade merits that's all that it shows!!! With the introduction of the new system, people stopped moving up the ranks, so this result!
It bought services, I guarantee it! get 100 merit for the usual message is unrealistic. People spread masterpieces and do not get even 1 point - and here corruption on the face - it is necessary to take away ranks from such donors of merits!

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: digaran on July 17, 2018, 12:43:35 PM

Yes I agree with you not. giving somebody 20 merits is not an excuse, it's simply being lazy ass merit source, or giving 5 merits to every single post you come across and like is also being lazy.
That's on you, if you want to keep meriting people like that. but sending merits to ANN threads or garbage posts is not OK. again this might be another of many double standards of our dear DT members. if some of the DT members have tagged people for similar merit transactions they should tag them all especially after they get to know about such cases.

You're right, 5 doesn't cut it. I'll consider adjusting it to 6 or 7.

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

Quote from: suchmoon on July 17, 2018, 12:30:58 PM

I've said it about a million times (give or take 999990): sending or receiving merits is not proof of anything. If there is other proof of these accounts being alts or in some sort of collusion - that could be considered merit abuse. Or if the merit activity prompts someone to dig into it and uncover other shady activities by these accounts - that's great too. Other than that we should not get carried away analyzing these merit transactions no matter how egregious it looks.

Yes I agree with you not. giving somebody 20 merits is not an excuse, it's simply being lazy ass merit source, or giving 5 merits to every single post you come across and like is also being lazy.
That's on you, if you want to keep meriting people like that. but sending merits to ANN threads or garbage posts is not OK. again this might be another of many double standards of our dear DT members. if some of the DT members have tagged people for similar merit transactions they should tag them all especially after they get to know about such cases.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

I've said it about a million times (give or take 999990): sending or receiving merits is not proof of anything. If there is other proof of these accounts being alts or in some sort of collusion - that could be considered merit abuse. Or if the merit activity prompts someone to dig into it and uncover other shady activities by these accounts - that's great too. Other than that we should not get carried away analyzing these merit transactions no matter how egregious it looks.

Cryptosandy1987

jr. member

Activity: 84

Merit: 6

A lot of discussions has been come up and some members also gave the valuable suggestions for preventing this. So this is my humble request to admin to do at least some action for these type of case or make some rules.guidelines for these cases.

In my opinion, this suggestion is the best solution till now...

Quote from: Jet Cash on July 17, 2018, 06:06:43 AM

demeriting is a bit of a rocky road, and could cause even more abuse. A simple alternative is to remove any merit associated with a post deleted by a mod or the original poster.

Jet Cash

legendary

Activity: 2814

Merit: 2472

https://JetCash.com

This could be because merit abusers are becoming more sophisticated. Ten awards of 5 merits is still an award of 50, but it may not be as obvious,

DdmrDdmr

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 10802

There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain

The issue with this sort of abuse in large chunks is that it stands out, denting the moral/conceptual goals of the Merit System.

The good news is that this (I believe) is a practice that is less common as time goes by (for multiple reasons). Infact, it is getting to be rather uncommon to see posts merited with 20 or over sMerits in a single TX.
If we take a look at the period of time going from the 1st of July 2018 until the 13th of July 2018 (to focus on a recent window), these are the TXs for 20 sMerits or above:

Code:

amount converted_date FromId FromName ToId ToName post_title PostURL
50 2018-07-02 01:41:21.000 176810 benthach 1208438 thenextking Re: What are the potential risk in joining an airdrop? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2375142.msg24228465#msg24228465
50 2018-07-12 19:42:11.000 21577 Ente 24140 qwk Re: Bitcoin & die Steuer - FAQ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976285.msg19673755#msg19673755
50 2018-07-01 06:23:34.000 648651 fanatic26 392563 chandra12 [AIRDROP] YOYOW [BOUNTY]✅✅✅✅ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3139057.msg41217165#msg41217165
50 2018-07-01 15:02:43.000 315650 Dogedigital 2188816 nessie.io Nessie.io - Exchange with Seamless Access to Digital Wallet & Gaming Services https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4438798.msg39657876#msg39657876
50 2018-07-04 19:36:23.000 202602 chek2fire 1267993 Leteravian Πρότυπo δημιoυργίας πίνακα https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4596709.msg41487910#msg41487910
46 2018-07-11 08:04:26.000 1320011 Jeremiesaranza 965234 dumbtool45 Re: [ANN] [ICO] SCRINIUM🔥 The future of portfolio investment https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2484536.msg37902368#msg37902368
46 2018-07-04 12:54:02.000 176128 bgpsq 1320011 Jeremiesaranza Re: What are the most common uses of Bitcoin? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2281388.msg34650713#msg34650713
45 2018-07-02 23:53:02.000 905193 Napole0n 921087 Tukang Becak Re: what is the future of virtual currency like bitcoin ? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2413780.msg39634835#msg39634835
36 2018-07-11 09:02:07.000 1393407 JaoBadjap 1509249 Dyanggok Re: Newbie Welcome Thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1358010.msg28317972#msg28317972
32 2018-07-03 00:52:35.000 934658 Konthol Ngaceng 921087 Tukang Becak Re: Is Bitcoin price ready to touch the moon..?? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3295344.msg40667764#msg40667764
31 2018-07-05 22:02:57.000 367083 minerx117 927785 EWBF_ Re: EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4466962.msg40058212#msg40058212
28 2018-07-02 23:51:03.000 916082 _Legendary_ 921087 Tukang Becak Re: How foolish are people who invest in Bitcoin? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2589880.msg39142728#msg39142728
27 2018-07-04 00:53:45.000 921229 King Sastro 921087 Tukang Becak Re: Money for school fees. Invested in bitcoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2832349.msg39142907#msg39142907
26 2018-07-04 04:32:18.000 929505 Bondho Kompeni 921087 Tukang Becak Re: Government and Bitcoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035614.msg38238340#msg38238340
25 2018-07-01 15:09:23.000 316957 AcoinL.L.C 338580 CrazyCraig Re: Moneypot: Powered by Monster Byte https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2345394.msg40683210#msg40683210
25 2018-07-04 12:52:05.000 392563 chandra12 1320011 Jeremiesaranza Re: Why you Still believe in Bitcoin? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3206467.msg34192008#msg34192008
25 2018-07-04 04:30:17.000 908780 Senja Kemuning 921087 Tukang Becak Re: its not about how much you invested, its when you should invest? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3267595.msg39140799#msg39140799
25 2018-07-08 19:26:09.000 255027 criptix 2189580 anunymint https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4579834.msg41317345#msg41317345
24 2018-07-12 21:29:20.000 346449 botany 321816 belcher Re: [ANN] Joinmarket - Coinjoin that people will actually use https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=919116.msg10096489#msg10096489
24 2018-07-01 15:07:30.000 338580 CrazyCraig 2188816 nessie.io Nessie.io - Exchange with Seamless Access to Digital Wallet & Gaming Services https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4438798.msg39657876#msg39657876
23 2018-07-04 12:26:27.000 916051 Sir Paijoe 921087 Tukang Becak Re: 7 REASONS WHY: which one are you? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3766385.msg37533176#msg37533176
22 2018-07-11 09:03:31.000 1509249 Dyanggok 1393407 JaoBadjap Re: Newbie Welcome Thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1358010.msg26055138#msg26055138
20 2018-07-10 06:27:04.000 902444 vivland 1320011 Jeremiesaranza Re: Bitcoin will hit 25k by the end of this Year? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3313706.msg34724425#msg34724425
20 2018-07-07 20:24:43.000 234771 suchmoon 334783 seoincorporation Re: I've just invented dMerits. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4619367.msg41711944#msg41711944
20 2018-07-11 00:42:26.000 255027 criptix 134226 Nestade https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4638379.msg41921753#msg41921753
20 2018-07-04 05:05:15.000 661316 mandica 2180275 XSPEC-team Re: [ANN] Spectrecoin (XSPEC) | Untraceable Tx | Tor Integration https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4434053.msg39594362#msg39594362
20 2018-07-11 11:11:56.000 98986 TMAN 1000199 krogothmanhattan Re: [REFERENCE] BREACHED or SCAM COINMAKERS LIST https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3315347.msg34617121#msg34617121
20 2018-07-11 11:12:17.000 98986 TMAN 346731 minerjones Re: [INFO] Looking for all maker's public address lists https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2022902.msg20155309#msg20155309
20 2018-07-01 21:24:15.000 405889 SyGambler 764113 Bit-Exo.com Re: [ANN] [PoS] BXO BitExo Casino-⚡PoW Ended⚡🚀🚀 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2296264.msg23299007#msg23299007
20 2018-07-01 21:23:17.000 405889 SyGambler 764113 Bit-Exo.com Re: █~★~█ Bit-Exo.com █~★~█ Dice,Plinko,Roulette Moneypot powered Bitcoin casinohttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1359320.msg13834689#msg13834689

The quantity is small, being that of 30 TXs for 20 or more sMerits. Amongst the above list, there a completely legit cases and merit abuse cases I’ve seen reported on other threads.

The overall TX merit distribution for the same period (the 1st of July 2018 until the 13th of July 2018) is:
50     5
[40..49]   3
[30..39]   3
[20..29]   19
[10..19]   82
[5..9]   294
[1..4]   2944

So all in all, individual TXs of a high amount are very few cases, so those TXs that are constituent of merit abuse are a drag by comparison, but small in the overall scheme of things.

olumyd

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 117

Quote from: RAMSHIVDEEPAK on July 17, 2018, 06:23:30 AM

So what, Admin will not do anything with above reported account. Moderator/amin should do some meaningful action against those and post it publicly,so In future members will fear of action for doing such type of merit trade.

Exactly, when people see the hung witch, they'll fear the practice of magic. Most people know that these complains become garbage themselves, and so, since nothing will be done, they'll continue with this wrong. IMO, I'd suggest a comprehensive list of those who are performing within the stipulated guidelines for the merit awarding system.

Topic: Are these posts deserve so much merits ??? (Read 497 times)