If a project cannot develop their project every year then this will be inferior to a new project that has a more effective mission and investors are certainly curious about new projects that offer certain advantages, then from there the old project will be forgotten little by little as happened to ico and IEO projects that are currently no longer able to compete and there are no investors promoting the project.
It doesn’t matter how the project team chooses to launch their project, every team has a different vision or idea of what they want to give to the community, so they are always going to do it differently. Whether they choose for it to come as a metaverse, ICO or IEO, it doesn’t really matter to people like that, what is much important to investors is that the project is able to accomplish what was said it would.
When I’m looking for a project to invest in, I don’t really check whether it’s a metaverse or whatsoever, like recently I don’t think I’ve ever invested in any meta project, but I’ve invested in others. So it’s all about how good I think that a project is. And not whether it is a metaverse or NFT or whatsoever. Despite that metaverse is a trend, that doesn’t mean that there are no bad projects being launched on it.