Topic: Are you often using the gambling site you promote to gamble? - page 4. (Read 1069 times)

Yes. The gambling site I promote is the ONLY one I currently use.

I have tried several others and have accounts on other platforms, but since I havent been gambling much lately, it is my go-to spot for some fun and excitement. Their platform is super user-friendly, the games are top-notch. I have nothing more to ask for.

These are just a few casinos that i have advertised that i have not gambled on but am currently enjoying the signature i am on and have already deposit through an offer. Moreover game signature i also bet some games there and started playing. Even some gambling sites make it hard for me not to play them. On the other hand if the amount of betting is high, i don't want to get caught there. It is actually a list of everyone favorites so it is not possible that everyone will rush to gamble on one site.

To an individual, wearing a signature may not necessarily mean they endorse the casino, especially when he is being paid for wearing that signature. But to others who trust the person displaying those signatures, it might mean alot and if the casino is not a reputable one, such promotion might end up misleading those who trust the promoter. Imagine someone who is known for  having a very good reputation promoting a fraudulent casino, such promotion will ruin things for many.

This things can actually be avoided if gamblers/promoters first do their findings about that casino before applying for signature campaigns. This is what I do whenever there is a new opening with a juicy offer. I need to know some things about who I'll be working for.

It should be the duty of anyone in a campaign to relate complaints to the campaign manager who will inturn communicate with the casino. Creating alt accounts to add more complaints to an already existing complaint(s) might not really get to the right source.

I'm wondering what would lead the user to raise an false accusations over a casino platform that he or she is promoting or wearing their signature by using an alternative account to do so, I do think before the user would do such thing ,that accusations must have weight, except for the fact that the persons is just doing that with the aim of tarnishing the image of that platform.

Then for the answer to what the op asked, I used the casino platform which I promote and even If I don't use some of them that often but in some cases, I use them in other to test-run how the platform works.

There is no harm trying out what you are advertising and of course you can't give any words to them if you aren't using them, it's very important to have tested and see what you are referring to people to use. Like I does most of the gambling site I uses to promote I do test them to know if I actually when referred someone close to me then I will be safe without being in a messed and whatever comes up is solely on me who showed them way to it.

Sorry your country is restricted maybe I will suggest you shouldn't give any review or talks more when you aren't using the services. Like I know, the duration of time you promoting any of these casinos you should at least knows how it works then you would be fine when someone complained about any casinos it's very easier for you to know whether such people are actually saying the truth because you also had experience from the said casino.

Almost every casino advertised here seems to have a few scam accusations with varying degrees of credibility. Wearing a signature shouldn’t imply that someone endorses a product. I don’t feel any obligation to use something because I am in a campaign. Some of these casinos block my region and even if I wanted to try them, I can’t. I will only speak positively about a casino if I have had good experiences with them, not because I am paid by them.

If I’m in a campaign, I prefer to stay neutral to avoid a conflict of interest but I might defend them if I feel someone is spreading FUD.

I never even thought of this and you could be right because some of this competitors can go extra mile to soil the image of their competitive site. And of true only such people can go to the length to bring down other casinos and most of them have learned in a hard way not to give much attention to some of the complaint that is raised here.

You see the part I just bolded? A lot of users have failed to realized this and then when they want to give feedback or complaints they tend to use insulted comments instead of being constructive.

Personally, I have seen several people do the same thing you did but instead of them being polite and ask for reasons why something like that was done they instead start shouting “scam! Scam!! Scam!!!” Which in most cases makes the casino representative ignore their posts.

The most recent was in bcgame thread although it was a bit different but still the comment lacked constructive criticism and so it didn’t get the attention the user wanted.

What you do is an honesty that will make them understand how you use the gambling platform, even if it becomes a mistake in the end.

Now I am at Rollbit and I also use the services provided by Rollbit, try some games, bet and do Future trading on Rollbit quite well.
But it is possible that I also use other gambling platforms to try how different it is with Rollbit so that there will be a comparison of which needs to be improved or what needs to be maximized.

Yes we can see that you are promoting a site that is your signature campaign, my friend, apart from promoting, furthermore, the point is if you are a gambler then do you have a schedule to play on the site you are promoting or not, my friend? Basically, yes, there is no compulsion at all to play on the site that we are promoting, especially if you are not a gambler, or if you do not have enough money that you can afford to lose.

But for me when I work somewhere, for example in a fast food restaurant, usually when I want to enjoy dinner out, I will prefer that place, as well as with my gambling habits, in the sense that when I want to gamble and when at the same time I have the amount of money that I can afford to lose, then I prefer to gamble at a place or site that I promote such as Stake.com which is usually once a week.

I do encounter an issue on Duelbits before since they restrict me to participate on their bonuses since I frequently use their free bet bonuses without taking regular bets or to be precise I’m betting only when there’s promotion involved that cause a bonus abuse.

I publicly post this on Duelbits Ann thread to express my distress then later on accept their decision since I already realized my mistake in the end. There’s nothing wrong to become transparent on the casino you are promoting if you have problem encountered.

Just do it on constructive way and I’m sure they will understand it properly.

I personally always use the gambling sites that I promote in campaigns, even though I'm not a big money bettor, but at least I'm active in gambling. Also, about the problems that people complain about I don't seem to experience, so I never complain. But in the past,  when I was a participant in the campaign of one of the gambling sites and when I got a problem,  then I could find out or by complaining through the chat feature on the gambling site itself. For me, when the gambling site has a large base or community,then I believe users will be fine. Because anyway, with a large gambling site and when there are complaints that are proven, then I am sure and have experienced it also the site will quickly overcome the problem, and that I experienced on several gambling sites also in the past.

You are very correct, majority's of the comments already pointed to that direction of the fact that, most already admitted that they gamble on the casinos that they are promoting even though in real life they don't even have an account from such a casino, I think a poll will not change anything either since we will likely see wrong voting with member ticking the yes instead of no even though in reality it is a no for most people.


If a poster includes a screenshot of his bet history on those casinos it be more authentic and acceptable, between that also we have to be responsible enough to always try out the platform we promote at least as a form of support and to also build our knowledge to help others when they raises concerns about the plartform we are wearing their signature.

Not promoting anything at the moment, but when I was, I used the site at least once per week. You have to know from your own experience what you promote, that's what I think.

If the topic of promoting a gambling site comes up then I must say yes I promote a gambling site. I personally do not promote any gambling sites offline but I promote a gambling site online by promoting signature campaigns on bitcoin forums. Since I am not in a signature camp, I am currently working on a popular gambling site (Rollbit). I do not promote any other site apart from this site.

Before, this kind of strategy of casino to bring down competitors is very popular but right now I doubt there’s still casino that do this since there’s already a lot of reputable casino available right now compared before that only few brand is at the top that makes it a common target for small casino.

Most of the scam accusation in the forum scam accusation board mostly from user that violates casino ToS through bonus abused or other method to take advantage against the casino.

Only few case are valid and the rest are those users seeking support for their abuse.

have an account but don't often play on the sites I promote, almost all sites that have a signature on this forum I have an account but I don't play 100% at one time or scheduled, I only play when I have free time and want a slightly challenging game with bets
responding to the problem of people reporting gambling sites with new accounts that are not real I think it's natural if they have evidence that is clear but it would be better to use a real account from the forum so that the problems that occur on the site in question are clear

We can assume that those newbie accounts might be that old time users of this forum. It is really just that they dont really like on making use of their main accounts on which we know that this
forum is really that highly reactive when it comes to mistakes and potential misinformation which would be leading to red trust of the account. This is why they will really be deciding on creating new
accounts and wont really be tending to put their main accounts in harm but actually there's no harm on using the main account as long the complaint does have that solid evidence. Going back into the question if
im using the gambling platform or site that shows into my signature space. Most of the time, its not.. but i do have tested out at least on which i do know on what it is feeling like on playing the platform.
As signature participant then it will really be that important or relevant that you should be wary at least on the site that you are promoting so that just in case there's someone who would be that asking
some questions then you could be able to answer it out and provide out legit and right information which in compared to those people who doesnt know on what the yare promoting then they might
mislead other people on the time that they would be asked for some information. So its  really that important even though not all would really be mindful on doing such act.

So far it's very rare to see these casinos come to respond to any complaint from these new accusations, over times this shows that they don't longer care about what people passes and or seems these cases aren't real and even with the evidence some of them may provide it seems not to be enough for the casino representative to respond toward the issues at hands.

Well, it really matters be it new and old account, the new account stands more chances to be easily honored but in other words if they aren't using their original profile then we can assumed that it's a paid post instead of mere complaint about their experience and problems they are facing over there.

My thing is not casino games, my thing is poker. And as I have repeatedly said there is no point of comparison between any crypto site and sites like Pokerstars.

What I do when I promote a casino is to test the service. I make a deposit, I see how the casino works, and what it offers, and I bet. But after that I don't bet anymore. So I don't use it often.


Yes, but they don't have to be alts from people participating in the campaign, they can be other forum members who prefer to use the alt for other reasons. Or alts from competitors to throw shit on the casino, as has been discussed. It is difficult to establish with certainty.