different use on customs as investors to work on tasks with evaluation and gains with confirmation as preparing use with funds to put on smart contracts as purchasing token with the initial offers on market with the ico scheme.
Topic: Are you willing to spend your time just for fraud projects? - page 2. (Read 461 times)
very often I saw that someone put a red flag for a project on this forum but in fact, the project worked and developed. you need to conduct your own investigation before participating or not participating
Can you site examples of those projects that were really successful with the bounty manger who have red tags within the period of campaign? I guess nobody wants to join even the investors if the promoters are red-tag members, so it is either they have been red tag after those projects was launched long ago and later on those managers were doing bad things and included in wrong activities such as scam that is why they have been tagged.
of course not, I won't waste my time on fraud projects. if you join a prize campaign make sure you take the time before joining in and also make sure that the project you want to participate in has a transparent team and also the products they offer are real.
They do not have the expertise to analyse the reputation of the project so they fall into the scam project, at least reading the information on the scam association thread. It's better before spending time working on a scammer
Many project are tagged scam but end up be a good one while some believe some project are super but end up be the scam one , so which ever way just be focus and believe in your and do the little you can to be as successful in your little way.
If you found out a user that spending time with it, probably that's noob just caring for the reward they'll get but at the end it's just a wasted effort.
Of course not who would want to waste their time on a scam project?
They would just waste their time and effort for nothing unless they would be paid in BTC,ETH or Fiat like bounty manager or being on the team.
But for me it is not worth it, It would just ruined your reputation.
They would just waste their time and effort for nothing unless they would be paid in BTC,ETH or Fiat like bounty manager or being on the team.
But for me it is not worth it, It would just ruined your reputation.
No way, I'm wearing a campaign for a project that have their rules and the administrator is awesome
I see a lot of projects that people have no idea what they are promoting, or if will pay correctly
It's up to you to choose if worths your time or not, if nobody enters on a campaign, the administrator will have to make more efforts to make a good project to people help promote
I see a lot of projects that people have no idea what they are promoting, or if will pay correctly
It's up to you to choose if worths your time or not, if nobody enters on a campaign, the administrator will have to make more efforts to make a good project to people help promote
certainly not. many bounty hunters misjudged the project they were participating in so they wasted no work for months. be careful to choose the bounty, enter into the merivie carefully before following the bounty.
It does not mean a lot of some account on this forum is marked with red, because sometimes they are getting marked for nothing. It is much more productive to get deeper into any project, to check the development level, to speak to admins in telegram and to decide on your own.
did you think those members who are giving negative trust is not providing evidence? it looks like you must watch it even more dude, any scam accusation that will result in the negative rating should be provided reliable evidence that can be trusted. It's true we must understand a platform deeper but when someone was providing strong evidence if that can be considered as an indication if such project is a scam and why we must still to get deeper into that scam project? 
No one of course wants to work for nothing. Most of those bounty hunters who keeps retweeting and reposting facebook posts are not reading the replies in the ANN threads here in the forum. Those bounty hunters probably even just use the automation system so they keep promoting projects that its developer were marked scammers by the scam busters. Sometimes its hard to tell who are scams though. Some projects appear to be legit but next morning its already scam.
I always advise bounty hunters to spend quality time doing research about projects before participating in any form of promotions to avoid wasted effort. The fact that a project got a red trust here on bitcointalk gives more reasons why proper due diligence should be done before participating. I've seen some comments here saying otherwise, I'm not saying the red trust means the project is 100% incompetent but it should serve as caution signal.
I was quite surprised by the bounty hunters, why they were willing to spend their time on fraud projects.
I observe a project that clearly has a bad reputation or warning (SCAM) in their gifts and also the team has a red trust, but many still believe and even take part in it?
Isn't it clear that their project is not good?
Are you willing to spend time just for fraud projects?
I do not!
No offense buddy, but most of bitcointalk users who promoted those shady projects are mostly newbies! let me clear this im nothing againts with newbies. but this is what ive seen. in the name of fairness some higher ranks are also promoted shady projects without noticing it. even me was also experiencing this before, thats why today im not just promote easily without a deeper analysis about the project. I observe a project that clearly has a bad reputation or warning (SCAM) in their gifts and also the team has a red trust, but many still believe and even take part in it?
Isn't it clear that their project is not good?
Are you willing to spend time just for fraud projects?
I do not!
Good thing you saw through it.
That is what they dont do. Look at the motive of the company and also its features and management.
They just simply join every bounty that will pop out there at bounties section of altcoin.
Most of them do facebook and twitter campaigns.
Well they will be the ones getting exhausted and not us.
About thw red trust though, they can be tagged too if proven they are supporting a scammer.
That is what they dont do. Look at the motive of the company and also its features and management.
They just simply join every bounty that will pop out there at bounties section of altcoin.
Most of them do facebook and twitter campaigns.
Well they will be the ones getting exhausted and not us.
About thw red trust though, they can be tagged too if proven they are supporting a scammer.
I learn to avoid any flagged project, even though they may have good intention, but market sentiment may just press down the growth fund rising. Even projects without any tags are still struggling, so negative flagged projects won't be very good to promote, save the team has enough fund to start the project and get it going until it gains trust.
Nobody wants to promote a fraudulent project if they know that the project is just a fraud even if he is a newbie. Maybe they don't understand how to distinguish between good bounties and not.
The moment I realize a bounty is a scam, I will stop promoting it because I might get a red trust. And the time I waste in that project, I can get payment from a legit bounty.
It's their decision, they are in charge of their accounts and they are matured enough to understand what they are doing and I believe no bounty hunter would want to waste his time by doing the job and get's nothing in return.
The fact that they continue to promote, that means they believe that the rating is not accurate or maybe some are not aware of the trust rating here in the forum, or some are just blinded by the good promise of reward but there's only few here with negative trust rating that succeeded in their project because they have more smart investors who investigate the substance of the rating than just conclude right away based on what is written in the rating.
The fact that they continue to promote, that means they believe that the rating is not accurate or maybe some are not aware of the trust rating here in the forum, or some are just blinded by the good promise of reward but there's only few here with negative trust rating that succeeded in their project because they have more smart investors who investigate the substance of the rating than just conclude right away based on what is written in the rating.
I was quite surprised by the bounty hunters, why they were willing to spend their time on fraud projects.
I observe a project that clearly has a bad reputation or warning (SCAM) in their gifts and also the team has a red trust, but many still believe and even take part in it?
Isn't it clear that their project is not good?
Are you willing to spend time just for fraud projects?
I do not!
It's hard to check for a scam project. They only have to do a series to avoid missing out on good opportunities. I think that's how the bounty hunter takes the most effort to do.I observe a project that clearly has a bad reputation or warning (SCAM) in their gifts and also the team has a red trust, but many still believe and even take part in it?
Isn't it clear that their project is not good?
Are you willing to spend time just for fraud projects?
I do not!
Do you think so?
I was quite surprised by the bounty hunters, why they were willing to spend their time on fraud projects.
I observe a project that clearly has a bad reputation or warning (SCAM) in their gifts and also the team has a red trust, but many still believe and even take part in it?
Isn't it clear that their project is not good?
Are you willing to spend time just for fraud projects?
I do not!
I observe a project that clearly has a bad reputation or warning (SCAM) in their gifts and also the team has a red trust, but many still believe and even take part in it?
Isn't it clear that their project is not good?
Are you willing to spend time just for fraud projects?
I do not!
I'll also get surprised if bounty hunters will continue to promote fraud projects, nobody in his right mind will invest in fraud projects, they are promoting it because they have no idea or do not know that they are promoting a scam project.
But it's promoting at your own risk, bounty hunters should always check the scam sections if they have a report on that section, always do due diligence, always check if the announcement thread is moderated, a transparent project should not have a moderated thread, investors and bounty hunters should question it.
Jump to: