The developer reason for developing it was as a result of his issue with lightning network
I’m working on a new lightning wallet. It removes pretty much all friction lightning currently faces:
1.Backups
2.Interactivity
3.Offline receiving
4.Receiver privacy
5.On-chain footprint
well if that's the case then let's join forces
I am coincidentally also working on a Lightning wallet (as long as it is written in Python as development of the wallet core has already begun).
The only downside is that Ark require users to come online and "refresh" their coins every few weeks, otherwise the ASP can sweep the funds.
is this the side effect of removing on-chain footprint?
Not really a downside as a "watchtower" program can be made that inputs your wallet password and the refreshing date in the future, which is stored with AES encryption in memory.
The key to this cipher is the time stored in ISO 8601 format as a byte string. It is promptly discarded from memory.
Every second, the watchtower will attempt to decrypt the cipher using the current ISO 8601 time looking like "YYYY-mm-ddTHH:MM:SS" as the key.
Naturally this will only succeed at the requisite time at which the wallet is to be unlocked - following which the coins inside the ASP can be refreshed.
If at any point you come online, you can simply terminate the watchtower program, and the encrypted wallet password will be destroyed and nobody will be able to use it unless they also know the unlock time,
even if they have hacked the watchtower on a later date after the timer has started. But the unlock time has already been discarded after it was used to encrypt the wallet password, meaning the deleted copy of the encrypted password is now unrecoverable.
This particular part is my own design, not Burak's. I haven't told him about this yet.