Quote
I don’t see main net being launched until mid-June 2017 at the earliest.
IS IT TRUE?
mid-june 2017?
no
Topic: ARK - DPoS 🔹 ARK Protokol 🔹 MarketSquare 🔹 IPFS 🔹 Staking on Binance 🔹 - page 443. (Read 781327 times)
February 03, 2017, 05:59:57 PM
IS IT TRUE?
mid-june 2017?
no
February 03, 2017, 05:39:28 PM
Quote
I don’t see main net being launched until mid-June 2017 at the earliest.
IS IT TRUE?
mid-june 2017?
February 03, 2017, 08:03:38 AM
When will the recalculation of the amount of ark be done?
Maybe it will be done by the end of this month, to recount the time that has been specified by the team, and there is a delay when the ark in share, with what you're asking today about the re-calculation ...This right should be applied, so that there are no mistakes or errors of performance of the campaign
because the time of the launch may be imminent (maybe)
what recalculation you are talking about ?? they said at the end of ICO that this was the final price and it won't be recalculated after refund
Refunds will go for 2nd round of funding that was stated a few times.
February 03, 2017, 07:25:08 AM
When will the recalculation of the amount of ark be done?
Maybe it will be done by the end of this month, to recount the time that has been specified by the team, and there is a delay when the ark in share, with what you're asking today about the re-calculation ...This right should be applied, so that there are no mistakes or errors of performance of the campaign
because the time of the launch may be imminent (maybe)
what recalculation you are talking about ?? they said at the end of ICO that this was the final price and it won't be recalculated after refund
February 03, 2017, 03:50:54 AM
and delay again, already tired of waiting in all projects at the same time
We could launch now - but what would be the purpose if we are not satisfied yet with our core and neither would be our participants? All this would reflect on trust and thus potential price on exchanges. If you can't wait a few more weeks than you are not in the right project and should participate in pump and dump projects that just fork basic QT wallet add a few images to it and thats it.
The "purpose" would be so you have credibility when you predict timelines. IIRC, it wasn't just that it would launch February 1st, but "probably earlier".
On what basis should we believe launch will take place in "a few more weeks"? Was your original plan just to "fork basic QT wallet"? Was that the original roadmap to a Feb 1 release date?
Look, you missed your own target date. Fine. It seems 90% of projects around here do. So OWN UP TO IT, APOLOGIZE and stop insulting your investors and supporters.
We already owned up to it. Don't get yippy here demanding things dude.
Delays happen, they happen in the real world too. We can't please all the people all the time but also we don't kiss everyone else's asses 24/7 even though we did already apologize for this situation.
I am always ARK's fan, ARK did great ICO innlast year, guys we need to be more confident, at least like me, I am very optimistic about ARK. We wikl rock and roll, we will go to da moon.
February 03, 2017, 03:49:11 AM
When will the recalculation of the amount of ark be done?
Maybe it will be done by the end of this month, to recount the time that has been specified by the team, and there is a delay when the ark in share, with what you're asking today about the re-calculation ...This right should be applied, so that there are no mistakes or errors of performance of the campaign
because the time of the launch may be imminent (maybe)
what recalculation you are talking about ?? they said at the end of ICO that this was the final price and it won't be recalculated after refund
February 03, 2017, 02:40:42 AM
When will the recalculation of the amount of ark be done?
Maybe it will be done by the end of this month, to recount the time that has been specified by the team, and there is a delay when the ark in share, with what you're asking today about the re-calculation ...This right should be applied, so that there are no mistakes or errors of performance of the campaign
because the time of the launch may be imminent (maybe)
February 02, 2017, 01:58:29 PM
When will the recalculation of the amount of ark be done?
Maybe it will be done by the end of this month, to recount the time that has been specified by the team, and there is a delay when the ark in share, with what you're asking today about the re-calculation ... February 02, 2017, 10:22:59 AM
It is interesting that were you doing till this time? All of you promise more and more during ICO and after that you are just lost. If we are not in "the right project" as you say, let's arrange the second return of investments. I think, many of us will agree to it.
We are not sitting idle, never have never will - we are developing all this time, testing internally and new public testnet is just around the corner (with a lot of improvements and features integrated) . Endusers see a GUI client, but there is a lot that we are doing in the backend (and is not seen to the naked eye) which will reflect in speed, security, stability and less problems once we go live. You can follow recent commits and changes for new ARK here :
https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-node/tree/newtestnet
https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-node/commits/acceptOrphanedBlocks
Is there trading for this?
We haven't launched yet, but we will be on exchanges once out.
The "purpose" would be so you have credibility when you predict timelines. IIRC, it wasn't just that it would launch February 1st, but "probably earlier".
On what basis should we believe launch will take place in "a few more weeks"? Was your original plan just to "fork basic QT wallet"? Was that the original roadmap to a Feb 1 release date?
Look, you missed your own target date. Fine. It seems 90% of projects around here do. So OWN UP TO IT, APOLOGIZE and stop insulting your investors and supporters.
Yeah I agree, but with a scope of this project predicting exact timelines is difficult and if pushing end product by a few weeks if it will result in better experience wouldn't participant in our TEC want that? It also looks better for potential exchanges that want to list us that they see a project that is running like it should. The only ones I could see complaining would be bounty hunters or FUDers who didn't participate.
QT wallet was just an example to make a point on some projects that are on time - we have our our client that was developed from scratch as you can see on our github : https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-desktop .
And I do apologize to every participant in our TEC - we are doing everything we can to launch a product worthy of its brand asap, give us a little more time and bear with us.
can you give us something to expect like we won't be disappointed? i know team ARK can be different from Iconomi team but at least this ICN had gave their investors were very happy since then. are we going to expect price to rise as early as a month because the platform already works?
We cannot be compared to Iconomi as they are a custom token on Ethreum chain, we are our own cryptocurrency that will also support launching your own tokens and integrate features that ARK will offer. We won't predict prices that is for market to determine.
to which platform can we compare Ark? Lisk?
if price drop right after being launched, what difference does ark have that it took months to get launched when the result has no difference.
February 02, 2017, 07:44:00 AM
When will the recalculation of the amount of ark be done?
February 01, 2017, 02:14:29 PM
and delay again, already tired of waiting in all projects at the same time
We could launch now - but what would be the purpose if we are not satisfied yet with our core and neither would be our participants? All this would reflect on trust and thus potential price on exchanges. If you can't wait a few more weeks than you are not in the right project and should participate in pump and dump projects that just fork basic QT wallet add a few images to it and thats it.
The "purpose" would be so you have credibility when you predict timelines. IIRC, it wasn't just that it would launch February 1st, but "probably earlier".
On what basis should we believe launch will take place in "a few more weeks"? Was your original plan just to "fork basic QT wallet"? Was that the original roadmap to a Feb 1 release date?
Look, you missed your own target date. Fine. It seems 90% of projects around here do. So OWN UP TO IT, APOLOGIZE and stop insulting your investors and supporters.
We already owned up to it. Don't get yippy here demanding things dude.
Delays happen, they happen in the real world too. We can't please all the people all the time but also we don't kiss everyone else's asses 24/7 even though we did already apologize for this situation.
February 01, 2017, 01:16:37 PM
It is interesting that were you doing till this time? All of you promise more and more during ICO and after that you are just lost. If we are not in "the right project" as you say, let's arrange the second return of investments. I think, many of us will agree to it.
We are not sitting idle, never have never will - we are developing all this time, testing internally and new public testnet is just around the corner (with a lot of improvements and features integrated) . Endusers see a GUI client, but there is a lot that we are doing in the backend (and is not seen to the naked eye) which will reflect in speed, security, stability and less problems once we go live. You can follow recent commits and changes for new ARK here :
https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-node/tree/newtestnet
https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-node/commits/acceptOrphanedBlocks
Is there trading for this?
We haven't launched yet, but we will be on exchanges once out.
The "purpose" would be so you have credibility when you predict timelines. IIRC, it wasn't just that it would launch February 1st, but "probably earlier".
On what basis should we believe launch will take place in "a few more weeks"? Was your original plan just to "fork basic QT wallet"? Was that the original roadmap to a Feb 1 release date?
Look, you missed your own target date. Fine. It seems 90% of projects around here do. So OWN UP TO IT, APOLOGIZE and stop insulting your investors and supporters.
Yeah I agree, but with a scope of this project predicting exact timelines is difficult and if pushing end product by a few weeks if it will result in better experience wouldn't participant in our TEC want that? It also looks better for potential exchanges that want to list us that they see a project that is running like it should. The only ones I could see complaining would be bounty hunters or FUDers who didn't participate.
QT wallet was just an example to make a point on some projects that are on time - we have our our client that was developed from scratch as you can see on our github : https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-desktop .
And I do apologize to every participant in our TEC - we are doing everything we can to launch a product worthy of its brand asap, give us a little more time and bear with us.
can you give us something to expect like we won't be disappointed? i know team ARK can be different from Iconomi team but at least this ICN had gave their investors were very happy since then. are we going to expect price to rise as early as a month because the platform already works?
We cannot be compared to Iconomi as they are a custom token on Ethreum chain, we are our own cryptocurrency that will also support launching your own tokens and integrate features that ARK will offer. We won't predict prices that is for market to determine.
to which platform can we compare Ark? Lisk?
if price drop right after being launched, what difference does ark have that it took months to get launched when the result has no difference.
February 01, 2017, 01:11:29 PM
I think your eyes were too big on that February launch window. It is so new without many examples to go off of that I think what people are mostly saying is that you should have given a more vague Q1 launch period rather than a specific date. I'll admit I never expected it to be released in early February. It sounded way too bold. I'm just glad you guys realized this and decided to work more on it rather than release some broken pre-alpha garbage.
All in all, it will be worth it.
PS If you guys need help I can always supply you guys with some Energy drinks, cocaine, and meth. You'll be done in a week... Or dead. One of those two.
All in all, it will be worth it.
PS If you guys need help I can always supply you guys with some Energy drinks, cocaine, and meth. You'll be done in a week... Or dead. One of those two.
Thank you for that last line it just made my day lauging so hard
February 01, 2017, 01:09:50 PM
I think your eyes were too big on that February launch window. It is so new without many examples to go off of that I think what people are mostly saying is that you should have given a more vague Q1 launch period rather than a specific date. I'll admit I never expected it to be released in early February. It sounded way too bold. I'm just glad you guys realized this and decided to work more on it rather than release some broken pre-alpha garbage.
All in all, it will be worth it.
PS If you guys need help I can always supply you guys with some Energy drinks, cocaine, and meth. You'll be done in a week... Or dead. One of those two.
All in all, it will be worth it.
PS If you guys need help I can always supply you guys with some Energy drinks, cocaine, and meth. You'll be done in a week... Or dead. One of those two.
February 01, 2017, 01:07:32 PM
and delay again, already tired of waiting in all projects at the same time
We could launch now - but what would be the purpose if we are not satisfied yet with our core and neither would be our participants? All this would reflect on trust and thus potential price on exchanges. If you can't wait a few more weeks than you are not in the right project and should participate in pump and dump projects that just fork basic QT wallet add a few images to it and thats it.
The "purpose" would be so you have credibility when you predict timelines. IIRC, it wasn't just that it would launch February 1st, but "probably earlier".
On what basis should we believe launch will take place in "a few more weeks"? Was your original plan just to "fork basic QT wallet"? Was that the original roadmap to a Feb 1 release date?
Look, you missed your own target date. Fine. It seems 90% of projects around here do. So OWN UP TO IT, APOLOGIZE and stop insulting your investors and supporters.
They HAVE "owned up to it" and they HAVE "apologized" and, I'm an investor and a supporter and I'm NOT insulted.
February 01, 2017, 12:41:29 PM
and delay again, already tired of waiting in all projects at the same time
We could launch now - but what would be the purpose if we are not satisfied yet with our core and neither would be our participants? All this would reflect on trust and thus potential price on exchanges. If you can't wait a few more weeks than you are not in the right project and should participate in pump and dump projects that just fork basic QT wallet add a few images to it and thats it.
The "purpose" would be so you have credibility when you predict timelines. IIRC, it wasn't just that it would launch February 1st, but "probably earlier".
On what basis should we believe launch will take place in "a few more weeks"? Was your original plan just to "fork basic QT wallet"? Was that the original roadmap to a Feb 1 release date?
Look, you missed your own target date. Fine. It seems 90% of projects around here do. So OWN UP TO IT, APOLOGIZE and stop insulting your investors and supporters.
Their original plan was to collect a certain amount of investment funds form the ICO. That did not happen and they had to revert to plan 2 and offer refunds. Give them a chance, it's a good project...
February 01, 2017, 12:39:55 PM
It is interesting that were you doing till this time? All of you promise more and more during ICO and after that you are just lost. If we are not in "the right project" as you say, let's arrange the second return of investments. I think, many of us will agree to it.
We are not sitting idle, never have never will - we are developing all this time, testing internally and new public testnet is just around the corner (with a lot of improvements and features integrated) . Endusers see a GUI client, but there is a lot that we are doing in the backend (and is not seen to the naked eye) which will reflect in speed, security, stability and less problems once we go live. You can follow recent commits and changes for new ARK here :
https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-node/tree/newtestnet
https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-node/commits/acceptOrphanedBlocks
Is there trading for this?
We haven't launched yet, but we will be on exchanges once out.
The "purpose" would be so you have credibility when you predict timelines. IIRC, it wasn't just that it would launch February 1st, but "probably earlier".
On what basis should we believe launch will take place in "a few more weeks"? Was your original plan just to "fork basic QT wallet"? Was that the original roadmap to a Feb 1 release date?
Look, you missed your own target date. Fine. It seems 90% of projects around here do. So OWN UP TO IT, APOLOGIZE and stop insulting your investors and supporters.
Yeah I agree, but with a scope of this project predicting exact timelines is difficult and if pushing end product by a few weeks if it will result in better experience wouldn't participant in our TEC want that? It also looks better for potential exchanges that want to list us that they see a project that is running like it should. The only ones I could see complaining would be bounty hunters or FUDers who didn't participate.
QT wallet was just an example to make a point on some projects that are on time - we have our our client that was developed from scratch as you can see on our github : https://github.com/ArkEcosystem/ark-desktop .
And I do apologize to every participant in our TEC - we are doing everything we can to launch a product worthy of its brand asap, give us a little more time and bear with us.
can you give us something to expect like we won't be disappointed? i know team ARK can be different from Iconomi team but at least this ICN had gave their investors were very happy since then. are we going to expect price to rise as early as a month because the platform already works?
We cannot be compared to Iconomi as they are a custom token on Ethreum chain, we are our own cryptocurrency that will also support launching your own tokens and integrate features that ARK will offer. We won't predict prices that is for market to determine.
February 01, 2017, 12:38:36 PM
and delay again, already tired of waiting in all projects at the same time
We could launch now - but what would be the purpose if we are not satisfied yet with our core and neither would be our participants? All this would reflect on trust and thus potential price on exchanges. If you can't wait a few more weeks than you are not in the right project and should participate in pump and dump projects that just fork basic QT wallet add a few images to it and thats it.
I don't think "many of us" would agree to that. I see a lot of investors here in it for the long run. A quick but flawed launch so we can go trade our ARKs away at the first chance we get does no one any good and, it's not why many of us came here and invested in this project. Better delayed than broken...
February 01, 2017, 12:33:46 PM
Still waiting for this coin to launch... when and where???
It will be distributed on 1 February, if not wrong, I just see the quote above about the distribution of funds this bounty, which will be traded if the ARK, everyone here was waiting for him where trading sites are good for developing ARK ..ppl u got the answer on every page and u still give the wrong info..
I hope you give the correct information sir,
don't like the other projects,
We are shooting for End of February but may be in March. We are organizing on the backend and fixcrypt has been working on re-writing the core for functionality and legacy issues.
Always better to get it right later than to get it wrong now. Go ARK!
February 01, 2017, 12:00:51 PM
and delay again, already tired of waiting in all projects at the same time
We could launch now - but what would be the purpose if we are not satisfied yet with our core and neither would be our participants? All this would reflect on trust and thus potential price on exchanges. If you can't wait a few more weeks than you are not in the right project and should participate in pump and dump projects that just fork basic QT wallet add a few images to it and thats it.
The "purpose" would be so you have credibility when you predict timelines. IIRC, it wasn't just that it would launch February 1st, but "probably earlier".
On what basis should we believe launch will take place in "a few more weeks"? Was your original plan just to "fork basic QT wallet"? Was that the original roadmap to a Feb 1 release date?
Look, you missed your own target date. Fine. It seems 90% of projects around here do. So OWN UP TO IT, APOLOGIZE and stop insulting your investors and supporters.
Jump to: