Topic: Armory - Discussion Thread - page 11. (Read 521901 times)

It's been a bumpy road, but I think we're finally getting there...

So we had a problem with auto-manage bitcoind in the .80 testing release (it's a pain to test with auto-bitcoind, so we miss that easily).  Sorry!  Hopefully this is the last testing release before the 0.93.1!

As usual, use the secure downloader to get it.  Only use the links below as a backup:

  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing for Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8+ (64-bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing for MacOSX 10.7+ (64bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing for Ubuntu 12.04+ (32bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing for Ubuntu 12.04+ (64bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing for RaspberryPi  (armhf)

  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing Offline Bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 exact (32bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing Offline Bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 exact (64bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing Offline Bundle for RaspberryPi  (armhf)

  Armory 0.93.0.82-testing: Signed hashes of all installers

Good point, though I'm not using non-ASCII (8bits) characters - I guess they would be "extended ASCII" (16bits - nothing MS-DOS wasn't already using with codepage 437, 850 or "win-dos" 1250).

"Right way" is debatable but I think the way it's actually implemented is fine. It's just it's not working as it should.

Interesting. There could actually be 2 separate issues. 1/ with Armory itself and the /-slash and 2/ with Bitcoin Core itself not liking non-ASCII (8bits) characters -or it's sth else entirely (luckily workarounds exist)

That being said, can I use my own rpc user / pass with armory or does it have to be those supplied when installing armory ?

Still wanting clarification on this as well as to ask another question.

In addition to the above question, if when setting up armory, you import an existing wallet from the QT client. If something RPC's in to the node and modifies the wallet by making new ones with labels. Since during Armory setup you requested to import the existing wallet. Do changes made to the wallet via RPC continue to import over ?

Not sure I asked this the way it needed to be but hope it made sense, Ty.

I'm with you, but then where would the .ini file be (and what if it were located in a path with non-ASCII characters)?

The "right" way to do this is of course to store settings in the Windows registry, however the Armory devs have to support multiple OS's, and it's understandable that they don't want to have to maintain different code paths for every OS.

On the plus side, an Armory dev did say that they plan to fix the non-ASCII-path issue over here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10727929

Another way to go about this would be to migrate all of the settings storage to QSettings. They already use Qt, and QSettings abstracts away the "right" thing and does it pretty well (it does use the Windows registry for example). Of course, every minute they spend fixing these types of issues is a minute they don't spend implementing something more important....

Trying to run core 0.10 and armory 0.93 on win7 x64. Neither can access the default db/blocks path.

For core, I think it's an issue with accented characters in the path (since 0.9, 0.8.6 was fine), so I changed the default bitcoin blockchain folder. Armory 0.92.3 was running fine with the changed --satoshi-datadir path  and was at least starting fine and showing me the wallets and transactions with core 0.10.

Upgraded to Armory 0.93 (disabled core auto start), first run with Armory 0.93: crashed when using the --satoshi-datadir argument. Start again without the --satoshi-datadir argument, seems to load fine, asks me if i wanted to delete the old db version from Armory 0.92.3, OK so far, then error message, cannot access the db in the user\appdata\roaming etc folder.

I did specify the correct paths in Armory for core and db but that didn't work (same issue with core 0.9.3 and armory 0.92.3). Is this related to core or Armory? (accented characters issue?))

In the end, I also changed the db path for Armory and am now running it with both --satoshi-datadir and --dbdir arguments. It's launched OK, sync'd OK, db re-built OK, scanning tx.

I wish there were a way to keep the settings within Armory and not in the program's link. Is this sth that can be fixed? (.ini file?)

Of course it's 32 bit, anyway, hope the oversight is fixed.

That being said, can I use my own rpc user / pass with armory or does it have to be those supplied when installing armory ?

Just pushed goatpig's fix into 0.93.0.70.  Yeah weird version number. This will be 0.93.1 after we've confirmed it does what it's supposed to.

As usual, get it from the secure downloader within Armory (help->update software).

  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing for Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8+ (64-bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing for MacOSX 10.7+ (64bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing for Ubuntu 12.04+ (32bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing for Ubuntu 12.04+ (64bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing for RaspberryPi  (armhf)

  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing Offline Bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 exact (32bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing Offline Bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 exact (64bit)
  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing Offline Bundle for RaspberryPi  (armhf)

  Armory 0.93.0.70-testing: Signed hashes of all installers

Is there a way to convert normal raw TX to Armory compatible TX? I found a simple script which does it. So would be helpful if there is a script for multisig TX. Thanks! Any opinions/suggestions are welcome!

   -MZ

Sorry for the late reply - I've been away from my computer in the last two weeks.

I already sent some logs on 20/2 - I have since then reverted to 0.92.3 (and still using BC 0.10.0) and for now everything is working OK.

Do you have a 32-bit version of Windows? Due to an oversight, Armory 0.93 can't be installed on them. If using for offline-only, you'll need to roll back to 0.92.3 for now. If using for online, you'll have to wait and see if service is restored. (Despite the oversight, running online Armory on a 32-bit system really can't be done just yet anyway.)

Ok, so I got cor 0.10 running, went to dl Armory 0.93 which afaik is supposed to be 0.10 compatable.

Anyway, when I run it I get some windows version error tellin me to dl a 32 or 64 bit compatable version. So what am I doing wrong here, previous version of armory ran fine but 0.93 seems fubar'd to me.

Ty.

Post that in the other thread so I can keep track =)

I think I'm all good now after updating to fixes branch. Thanks!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/users-experiencing-the-bdm-error-message-970983

Hi,

I keep getting the error "Armory scanning interrupted unexpectedly". Armory then asks me to check the box to re-scan and rebuild the database on next time Armory starts. If I do not check the box I get prompted with the same error on restart. This happened two times already in the last few days.

I'm running the latest armory on 64-bit linux with 16gb ram. My internet connection is fairly slow though, especially upload speed.

You mean the 32bit part or the 12.04 part?

We got some fixes incoming soon that will get Armory going again on 12.04 among other things. For x86 support you'll have to wait for the next subversion.

nvm, fixed.

when is the 0.93 update going to work with my OS?

Care to elaborate?

If you restart Armory it shouldn't be mmap'ing as much memory. Next version will be a lot tamer on that front, and I also may just close and reopen the DB just to flush out the mmap data after the scan is over. For now you'll have to deal with the scary numbers =P

I think you are correct. It's probably not a memory leak, ArmoryQt itself only uses 300M, on top of bitcoind's 500M.  However it's still scary to see so much memory being mmap'd, rarely have I seen this before.

Thanks for pointing that out.