Pages:
Author

Topic: Armory - Discussion Thread - page 26. (Read 521901 times)

legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
September 17, 2014, 11:14:07 PM
Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?

Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.

Does it mean Armory will support the long awaited BIP32 (deterministic wallet) and 39 (Mnemonic code)? I guess it has to or it won't work with Trezor.
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 1375
Armory Developer
September 17, 2014, 09:19:24 AM
Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?

Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
September 17, 2014, 06:14:27 AM
Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
September 14, 2014, 08:06:40 AM
If I forget my encryption phrase, can I restore my wallet from an unencrypted paper backup?

Yes, that's the point! :-)
Also, I encourage everyone to at least have one unencrypted, physical paperwallet.

Ente
full member
Activity: 557
Merit: 101
September 14, 2014, 07:57:37 AM
If I forget my encryption phrase, can I restore my wallet from an unencrypted paper backup?
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001
https://gliph.me/hUF
September 10, 2014, 12:57:13 PM
I think it'd be good if you made the offline version of Armory to work with Lubuntu.  As most people use older hardware for offline machines plus the latest Lubuntu 14.04 is an LTS version.  [...]

I installed on Lubuntu 14.04 (works for others too). It's not that hard to do: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-to-get-the-needed-packages-on-your-offline-computer-synaptic-pm-777625
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1093
Core Armory Developer
September 09, 2014, 08:48:46 AM
What is the recommended offline bundle for a Raspberry Pi?  The 0.92.1 on the website; the 0.92.2-testing version posted here; or a newer version?  I plan to set up a new offline computer for long-term storage.

For a non-OSX offline computer, it doesn't make a difference.  0.92.2 is basically just a bugfix release for OSX and some privacy issues with online computers (and will be "official" very soon)
hero member
Activity: 547
Merit: 500
Decor in numeris
September 09, 2014, 03:34:18 AM
What is the recommended offline bundle for a Raspberry Pi?  The 0.92.1 on the website; the 0.92.2-testing version posted here; or a newer version?  I plan to set up a new offline computer for long-term storage.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001
https://gliph.me/hUF
September 09, 2014, 12:30:47 AM
On the other hand, I just leave Armory running.  Can use File-->Minimize to keep it hidden.  It shouldn't require much in terms of resources, and then is instantly available whenever you need it.  But I understand not everyone wants to do that (or might be resource-limited)

As yet another way, I have bitcoind (of bitcoin-core) in autostart. As it itself has no GUI, I won't even see it. The blockchain is always up-to-date this way, and whenever I run Armory, it's all ready in less than a minute.

How about a solution like amule / amuled? The daemon runs in the background and the GUI only connects when needed.
http://wiki.amule.org/wiki/FAQ_amulegui
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 251
September 07, 2014, 01:54:57 PM
Until then, I'm not sure there's much we can do.... 

Thanks for the information. I'll keep an eye open for that. I will however try what you and others suggest in keeping core/Armory running in the background and see how that goes over the next week. Seems to be the solution.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013
September 07, 2014, 01:51:49 PM
Until then, I'm not sure there's much we can do
You could let Armory download blocks from the node it connects to as a peer instead of requiring direct file access to the blockchain so that we aren't limited to using Armory with Bitcoin Core.
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
September 07, 2014, 01:05:14 PM
On the other hand, I just leave Armory running.  Can use File-->Minimize to keep it hidden.  It shouldn't require much in terms of resources, and then is instantly available whenever you need it.  But I understand not everyone wants to do that (or might be resource-limited)

As yet another way, I have bitcoind (of bitcoin-core) in autostart. As it itself has no GUI, I won't even see it. The blockchain is always up-to-date this way, and whenever I run Armory, it's all ready in less than a minute.
Also, that way I help the Bitcoin network with a semi-always online node (with portforwarding).

Ente
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1093
Core Armory Developer
September 07, 2014, 10:49:01 AM
Love Armory but will be, unfortunately, switching to Electrum today.

Been waiting now for close on an hour now for Bitcoin Core to update the last 80 odd blocks.

I'm not a frequent user meaning that I often have a couple of hundred blocks to update when I open Armory. My ISP seems to be seriously trotting P2P traffic due to torrent downloads and this seems to have a direct effect on the updating of Armory/Bitcoin Core as the updating takes ages, even if just a hundred blocks.

I understand that this is no fault attributable to Armory so actually sad as I loved it but these updates are killing me. Would love to see a Armory 'thin client' in the future even if a scaled down version used only to do quick checks.


Who knows how long it will be, but I know that Core is going to eventually implement parallel downloading of blocks.  The problem right now is that Core only downloads from one peer at a time, and if that peer happens to be slow, it takes forever.  It's an epic weakness in a program that requires handling many gigabytes of data, and they apparently have a test branch that solves it.  But I don't know how long it will be before that is released.  When they finish that, we will remove the torrent feature from Armory, as the new Core feature will essentially obsolete the benefits of a separate tor downloader (gmaxwell has written about being able to saturate his bandwidth with the new parallel downloader).  Until then, I'm not sure there's much we can do.  I appreciate that you understand it's not directly attributable to use, and maybe when they get that in there, catching up won't be so difficult anymore.

On the other hand, I just leave Armory running.  Can use File-->Minimize to keep it hidden.  It shouldn't require much in terms of resources, and then is instantly available whenever you need it.  But I understand not everyone wants to do that (or might be resource-limited)

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 251
September 06, 2014, 09:02:15 AM
Love Armory but will be, unfortunately, switching to Electrum today.

Been waiting now for close on an hour now for Bitcoin Core to update the last 80 odd blocks.

I'm not a frequent user meaning that I often have a couple of hundred blocks to update when I open Armory. My ISP seems to be seriously trotting P2P traffic due to torrent downloads and this seems to have a direct effect on the updating of Armory/Bitcoin Core as the updating takes ages, even if just a hundred blocks.

I understand that this is no fault attributable to Armory so actually sad as I loved it but these updates are killing me. Would love to see a Armory 'thin client' in the future even if a scaled down version used only to do quick checks.




legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
no need to carry heavy money bags anymore
September 05, 2014, 01:31:21 PM
Hi, I recently withdrew about 5btc into my offline Armory wallet about a week ago. Transaction was completed and I could see funds sitting there. I recently restarted Armory and the funds are now missing with the transaction history missing?

try to rescan database

Problem fixed ty

np, I had similar issue while ago  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1146
Merit: 1000
September 05, 2014, 01:23:58 PM
Hi, I recently withdrew about 5btc into my offline Armory wallet about a week ago. Transaction was completed and I could see funds sitting there. I recently restarted Armory and the funds are now missing with the transaction history missing?



try to rescan database

Problem fixed ty
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
no need to carry heavy money bags anymore
September 05, 2014, 01:17:28 PM
Hi, I recently withdrew about 5btc into my offline Armory wallet about a week ago. Transaction was completed and I could see funds sitting there. I recently restarted Armory and the funds are now missing with the transaction history missing?



try to rescan database
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
September 05, 2014, 01:16:21 PM
Hi, I recently withdrew about 5btc into my offline Armory wallet about a week ago. Transaction was completed and I could see funds sitting there. I recently restarted Armory and the funds are now missing with the transaction history missing?



Is the blockchain fully loaded?
legendary
Activity: 1146
Merit: 1000
September 05, 2014, 11:58:44 AM
Hi, I recently withdrew about 5btc into my offline Armory wallet about a week ago. Transaction was completed and I could see funds sitting there. I recently restarted Armory and the funds are now missing with the transaction history missing?

legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
September 02, 2014, 01:38:36 PM
Hi guys, I just want to ask whether the feature "open relevant wallet" from the main "transactions" list works properly?
After right click on any transaction and "open rel. wal.", it just open a wallet which is marked in my "Available wallets" (top right)  Huh
I would rather see the real relevant wallet.
Anybody else having same issue or just me?


Yeah mine's random
Pages:
Jump to: