Topic: Ashamed to be a bitcoiner – Bitcoin Expo London - page 2. (Read 6851 times)

And who will do that? The already wealthy people buying bitcoins right now or the early adopters that only spend their coins on new mining equipment?

OP

everyone in the UK uses the pound coin there are people that wear suits, there are people that are homeless. there are intellectuals, there are idiots.
there are logical thinkers, there are tinfoil conspiracy theorists. this is what i call a community.

i am sorry if you prefer to only hang around with oxford scholars. but that is your failings. welcome to the real world of an expanding currency.. everyone is welcome. whether we like it or not.

i personally was in your boat too but i learned to embrase the openness of bitcoin, and not think of it as 'for snobby members only club'. after all snobs usually have bank accounts and offshore accounts in europe. with 'faster payment' services so what bitcoin would bring to the UK is not fast funds transfer, but access to banking for the unbankable and ways for the unemployed to find work outside of establishment.

I also thought it was really interesting and I saw a lot of "father & son" pairs around. I thought that was really sweet.

As for the dress sense of the people there, it was fine. And female to male ratio was surprisingly high for a tech conference. The ladies were also participating, with a girl behind me asking Richard Stallman a pretty decent question, and another lady filming the whole thing from the floor at the front and cheering whenever pro-Libertarian sentiments were expressed by the panel. In fact probably one of the best female/male participation ratios I've seen at a technical expo / conference.


Yeah, and the venue was terribly lit, which did make everyone look a bit more dingy. However, some would argue that Richard Stallman (definitely a keynote speaker) was one of the ones that "looked like a hobo", so the OP should hardly have gone there expecting to have everyone clean-shaven and in suits!


The speakers pitching products earlier in the day might not have been well-prepared, but I thought the ideas and arguments in the panel were great - check out the (very dark) video of the panel discussion below. It's a real shame the OP couldn't see past the presentation and enjoy the content.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm6rF7lVeog

scotjam

This isn't about statism as much as it isn't about anarchism. This is about bitcoin and shouldn't be coat hangered by politics.

Thank you OP for making the case for statism appear less attractive 

I was at the conference too. I don't share the OPs issues with the guests attending I was expecting a good mix of different kind of people. I was actually suprised that there were quite a few people above the age of 40.

What was disappointing for me was the organization of the conference. Just a few points:

- The two venues were not well choosen. These two places in Brick Lane are great places if you want to entertain yourself but not great if you want to listen to speakers, check out some product and service suppliers and do general networking.

- The sound quality was rather poor I really had lots of issues to understand what speakers said because first the microphones were crap and second there were always people chatting in the back because the stands were in the same room.

- Lots of the speakers were not well prepared I thought. If I would have to pay a lot of money to be able to pitch my new product to an interested audience I would prepare much better.

Going forward I hope that the organizers choose a better location next time and that the quality of speakers improve. All in all it was still great to get an idea of whats coming and meet lots of like minded people.

Are you kidding me?

OP reminds me of this poem I  read somewhere, must have been a long time ago ....

"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

OP; I have to ask.. wtf are you talking about?

People being rude by not allowing people to pass.. genuine gripe.  A speaker disregarding the other speakers whose slot he is infringing upon, genuine gripe.

People cheering 1000 silk roads.. that is not a genuine gripe.  If you are excited about bitcoin for no reason other than it has, and will continue to, make you fat fiat profits.. then you are in the minority among the true believers; and history will be the judge of your convictions.

People embrace bitcoin not just because it is "sound money" *per se*; but because of the ramifications of sound money.  Those stinky neckbeards you love to hate, they see something you have apparently missed: many aspects of the state are evil (including, quite loudly, the so called 'war on drugs').

Not because I think it is the most important example, but because you specifically bring it up and it is just oh-so-easy to destroy, the inevitable '1000 silk roads' is a direct result of a combination of lobbies and facist, religiously-inspired legislation that does nothing but harm to everyone other than the government agencies which are granted power to enforce such legislation; as well as profit for the check-writers for said lobbyists.

Is heroin itself bad?  Maybe.. Is heroin addiction bad?  Clearly.  What about marijuana, should that be illegal too, Mr. Nostink? Has elevinty billion dollars and some of the most powerful government agencies in the world done a single iota to stop heroin addiction, or heroin distribution?  No.  

They have done one thing: consolidated the absolutely inevitable suppliers for this free market demand into cartels.  They have increased risk to drug addicts by an order of magnitude since they get neither government nor legal free-market oversight to verify the purity of their drugs; and they source them from dangerous situations.  They have increased prices by an orders of magnitude, leaving addicts not only high, but desperately broke.. unable to get themselves out of a hole which surely only further triggers the underlying neurosis that is leading them to addiction in the first place.

i was with you, for a minute; a bunch of stinky neck-beards being geeky and self-important. It's annoying, I can see.  It doesn't rub me personally, but I can see how a stick-in-the-butt but otherwise genuine figure could be turned off by it.  

But getting pissed off that people are bringing up anarchism at a fucking bitcoin conference?  You have to be out of your mind.  Anarcho-capitalism?  Heard of that?  Any non-gutter-punk pseudo intellectual or better that even feigns to promote 'anarchism' is fundamentally assuming that commerce will continue to happen among a bunch of self-interested actors.  Are you so completely removed?

We need a revolution.  We need a revolution for the exact reason that we need bitcoin.  Wealth continues to be concentrated in the hands of the few that are closest to the fountain-of-cash known as central banks; while the middle class shrinks and billions continue to live in poverty.  "Capitalism" is simply freedom.  Freedom to transact and trade capital for one's best interest.  God forbid people recognize the blindingly-obvious fact that power is currently almost entirely in the hands of those that go beyond their own freedom to transact, but shape society and law to restrict others from doing so.

You've received a lot of support and agreement, well of course.  Probably half from anti-bitcoin circle jerkers; as well as other short-sighted fools like yourself.  Look here, in this thread, up until this post and past it; look at your article submitted to /r/bitcoin.  Read the comments.  Go on pretending that the bitcoin community agrees with you; if you can handle the mental dissonance--you seem upto the task.

Viva la resitance!

I guess I would be one of the slightly more well dressed non stink anarchist / mindless libertarian types.

Anarchism is not about no rules... and 'anarchy' as you have been led to believe, it is about the fundmental right for someone not to use force / violence / coercion against someone else.

You seem to think you have the right todo this.

I'm happy with Cody Wilsons, 'there will be a 1000 silk roads', because he's right, there will be, the cat is out the bag, bitcoin destroys statism, taxation and the war on drugs...  maybe your just a well dressed pompous idiot who hasn't yet figured this out ?

So.

Eat it.

Yep totally agree that's nothing to do with bitcoin.

Actually I think that conferences should be an open and accesible space for everyone who wants to get involve, and let know and inform all the people. But actually the people who is doing that conf are looking for an specific kind of people wearing a suit, well shaved and business looking...


what the fuck are you saying, bitcoin is money. And money is used for that exactly end that you are saying for the ages of it's creation.

It really is too bad that such an amazing invention as Bitcoin has to be usable for those who want to enslave fellow human beings via institutional violence too.

Which has nth to do with the Bitcoin. That has to do, with the people how they are here and i know it, because i also live here.
In all other aspects, i'm completely with you.

If you're looking for a more well polished crowd whether politically or fashionably correct maybe go to downtown London the capital of financial corruption.  Bitcoin was created by most of these people who you look down on, who gave bitcoin a good look early on and saw the value, you're a pompous politically correct douche

This is a pity because:

Bitcoin != Libertarianism
Bitcoin != Anarchism
Bitcoin == Bitcoin

well what can I say, congrats to you for the support on your article. Should that make me change my mind? Yeah we all do judgements based on appearences andfirst impressions, for that someone has to be aware of that and try to look beyond.
Did the one of the event sponsors said that... so.... what's the point? should that make me change my mind?
but again i'll try to explain better, that situation that you describe:

"Excuse me, can I squeeze past" - the response I received? "No, I'm standing here"...

or even worst has happened to me with that kind of people that you think won't do that, my point is retarded arseholes there are everywhere. So I don't really see your point. Next time go to USA conf not to london's. Is like I don't like the people in the bar of the corner, so next time you won't go right?

Next weekend is the latinamerican bitconf here in buenos aires where i live. I'd like to go really, but it is quite expensive. I can afford it, but honestly for that price I know the kind of people that is going to be there, and nop I'm not interested.

Yes indeed... hence the concerns of addicts with money. But also more to the point, there's no excuse to be an arsehole, homeless, rich or both.

You do understand that those boarderliner homeless people as you called them might be multimillionaires right 

I've received a lot of support and agreement on the article... One of the event sponsors even said the london bitcoin culture was far more "grimy and underground" than in the US. I do judge people based on their appearance (everyone does) and I definitely judge people based on their attitudes, and I have to admit on both counts I was not impressed. My experience of the event was that a certain spectrum (not all, probably about 1/3rd to half) of the attendees fit what I described. Example, I said "Excuse me, can I squeeze past" - the response I received? "No, I'm standing here"...

yeah, i don't really get what OP is going at.. sounds a bit elitist. so what if they are hippies? bitcoin is supposed to be the birth of a new generation, and it includes bum-looking people.

if they do drugs, so what? that's their choice.. they don't have to be "tidy looking" and professional. while i am against anarchism, if that's what bitcoin supporters believe, then why not just leave it be? bitcoin is money, for certain, but as far as i know, anarchists are not against trade or currency.. they are just against big government.

just remember that those bums could be looking at you as if you are just another person who is part of the establishment.