Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 1021. (Read 3917568 times)

sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 252
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 11
You assume that lowering the price will result in the same amount of sales. In reality lowering price usually increases sales as demand and supply match again after changes. Selling 200 blades at 30BTC is more than 100 blades at 50BTC. Another point here is better ROI for buyers, as they are more likely to buy more hardware in the future if they manage to make some BTC. At current prices it's very likely some buyers may not get back their investment which will be disappointing for them and will kill the desire to buy more hardware in the future.
But you also have to consider that the more chips you sell, the more the difficulty will rise, so there are pretty strong diminishing returns in increasing sales...


With today's hashrate even hundreds of blades won't add much difficulty. It's very uncertain what other players will bring during the summer, except maybe for Avalon chips that will start hashing in July/August. But if hash rate will go to 200-300 TH/s one Blade will be a drop in the ocean. At that point they'll have to lower the price a lot, and increase sales a lot too.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
As ASICMiner is doing so well and BFL has a few issues, why doesn't it just offer to buy Butterfly labs (the company, not their ASIC's)?
They can't do a worse job of running BFL than the current owners, and they may even be able to use Firedcat's Midas touch to make us some more money

Tongue
how much does vaporware go for these days?


How much you got??
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
You assume that lowering the price will result in the same amount of sales. In reality lowering price usually increases sales as demand and supply match again after changes. Selling 200 blades at 30BTC is more than 100 blades at 50BTC. Another point here is better ROI for buyers, as they are more likely to buy more hardware in the future if they manage to make some BTC. At current prices it's very likely some buyers may not get back their investment which will be disappointing for them and will kill the desire to buy more hardware in the future.
But you also have to consider that the more chips you sell, the more the difficulty will rise, so there are pretty strong diminishing returns in increasing sales...
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I will check back next weds. to post how bfl went from 102 jallys to ? jallys.
maybe you should wait until they've delivered enough orders to only be 1-2 months behind.  That's the point when it actually matters.


Quote
As I said I sold off 2 little single orders to get into AM. I now sold off my AM.
  Will you be buying back those pre-orders?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
As ASICMiner is doing so well and BFL has a few issues, why doesn't it just offer to buy Butterfly labs (the company, not their ASIC's)?
They can't do a worse job of running BFL than the current owners, and they may even be able to use Firedcat's Midas touch to make us some more money

Tongue
how much does vaporware go for these days?
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 255
time will tell if I spotted a turning point or made a fool of myself.  
It's never foolish to realize a profit. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
does anyone see people selling AM products/shares to buy BFL products?  I see people selling BFL pre-orders to buy blades and AM shares all the time...


I agree , but the worm turns.

 As I said I sold off 2 little single orders to get into AM. I now sold off my AM.  I will hold  the coins  and take a va kay from this btc world.  I will check back next weds. to post how bfl went from 102 jallys to ? jallys.

 time will tell if I spotted a turning point or made a fool of myself.  
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
The delivered status was frozen for what seemed like forever well it is no longer frozen.
yeah, but the backlog is enormous.  those units were ordered last June/July.  

How can that possibly be competition for products that are ordered this week, shipped this week?

I mean, come on.  On one hand, you have products shipping that were purchased a year ago with a huge backlog of orders behind them, and on the other hand, you have products that you can get in a few days.  Which do you buy?

Price is not the only thing with mining hardware, speed of delivery is very important.  BFL can ship all the 1 yr old orders they want, but that does not compete at all with AM hardware that ships immediately.

I've been keeping my own track of BFL's order book. Even the newbs are wising up where BFL is concerned. The number of new invoices they are generating per day has been steadily declining for a while. The rolling 5-day average is now down to about 250 from a high of almost 1000 on the 10th of April:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AlTboxjHIfuGdFd4NEJOcVBqRHRnQkVfVWVCcnBfdVE&gid=1

I estimate that about 40% of invoices end up being paid for so they're currently only getting about 100 new orders a day, mostly 5GH/s miners. If that's their only source of cash flow they'd want to have a hefty bankroll saved if they have any new NRE coming up.
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
As ASICMiner is doing so well and BFL has a few issues, why doesn't it just offer to buy Butterfly labs (the company, not their ASIC's)?
They can't do a worse job of running BFL than the current owners, and they may even be able to use Firedcat's Midas touch to make us some more money

Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
"to be or not to be, that is the bitcoin"

I have some suggestions:

1 - make a public thread for the FAQ so that people know if a question has been submitted already. This also allows people to "second" a question, and to comment or take inspiration from others questions.

2 - possibly voting on the choice of questions. If it is to be monthly, and only a handful of questions, this could be a good idea to make sure the majority are happy.

3 - "yes/no" questions for areas that may be sensitive, or in order to get more information at a quicker rate without wasting friedcat's time perhaps.

4 - perhaps scouring the thread for important unanswered questions. Then again, those who asked them should still have them on their mind I guess...

If this is done, I'd like the results of voting on what questions are submitted remain confidential. That way if a question is popular but sensitive, AM can choose whether to answer it, bearing in mind that it will be released to the public.


good idea
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
does anyone see people selling AM products/shares to buy BFL products?  I see people selling BFL pre-orders to buy blades and AM shares all the time...
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
BFL does better marketing, that is a fact.
that's true, but that is a fairly easy fix for AM. 200 btc would completely change the situation.

Agree, but seem its necessary to Fix.  Somebody who doesnt know about the blades, dont buy it
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
BFL does better marketing, that is a fact.
that's true, but that is a fairly easy fix for AM. 200 btc would completely change the situation.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

I have some suggestions:

1 - make a public thread for the FAQ so that people know if a question has been submitted already. This also allows people to "second" a question, and to comment or take inspiration from others questions.

2 - possibly voting on the choice of questions. If it is to be monthly, and only a handful of questions, this could be a good idea to make sure the majority are happy.

3 - "yes/no" questions for areas that may be sensitive, or in order to get more information at a quicker rate without wasting friedcat's time perhaps.

4 - perhaps scouring the thread for important unanswered questions. Then again, those who asked them should still have them on their mind I guess...

If this is done, I'd like the results of voting on what questions are submitted remain confidential. That way if a question is popular but sensitive, AM can choose whether to answer it, bearing in mind that it will be released to the public.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
The delivered status was frozen for what seemed like forever well it is no longer frozen.
yeah, but the backlog is enormous.  those units were ordered last June/July. 

How can that possibly be competition for products that are ordered this week, shipped this week?

While I agree, there is indeed some crossover. Your average bitcoiner is not only ignorant enough to compare BFL's offering with AM's and choose BFL, despite uncertain shipdates, but they are also ignorant enough to not even know AM blades exist. BFL does better marketing, that is a fact.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
The delivered status was frozen for what seemed like forever well it is no longer frozen.
yeah, but the backlog is enormous.  those units were ordered last June/July.  

How can that possibly be competition for products that are ordered this week, shipped this week?

I mean, come on.  On one hand, you have products shipping that were purchased a year ago with a huge backlog of orders behind them, and on the other hand, you have products that you can get in a few days.  Which do you buy?

Price is not the only thing with mining hardware, speed of delivery is very important.  BFL can ship all the 1 yr old orders they want, but that does not compete at all with AM hardware that ships immediately.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
But it's not necessary to try to predict the ability of competitors to deliver products; it's sufficient to gauge whether or not we think we would make more money by lowering prices at current market conditions, and if we think that's the case, we should do it.

+1

That is a subtlety I disagree with. In order for AM to always be the leader, they actually need to always lower prices at least a couple weeks BEFORE their competitors sell a competitive offering.

I disagree: they should keep higher prices until it is clear that the competitors are really gaining an edge.
"Just lowering the price" leads to a downward spiral were everyone loses.
full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
yes of course but the problem is BFL is more then 10X lower in price and they are really shipping the jallys.  I rather be ahead of the curve and pull profit now.
they are shipping jals that were ordered almost a year ago!
 


 that is the exact point that everyone keeps clinging to .  I am saying stop clinging to that. I am saying look at this link


http://bfl.ptz.ro/    watch it change day by day.  then decide. 

The delivered status was frozen for what seemed like forever well it is no longer frozen.

Come on!!! Stop spreading fud. And please go educate yourself. as if share price would directly reflect hardware prices tzzzz. AM can sell at those high prices, because nobody else can deliver. thats just the right thing to do. if other can deliver aswell, am will lower prices and still beat them, because they are in shenzen and have everything right at their hands.
Jump to: