...
If for example AM was hosting their miners with a 3rd party and stopped paying hosting fee's over the Chinese New Year, the 3rd party might be inclined to withhold access to the miners and instead mine for themselves until payment is made...
If for example AM was hosting their miners with a 3rd party and stopped paying hosting fee's over the Chinese New Year, the 3rd party might be inclined to withhold access to the miners and instead mine for themselves until payment is made...
Are you saying this is a total fabrication?
update
The 3.546PH AMHash's hashrates have disappeared since 25th Dec 2014. We found this problem two days later,we asked friedcat,he said it was mining farm's maintenance issues,hashrates would come back soon.But one week later,hashrates didn't come back yet.When we asked FC again, we were told that all mining devices were robbed by the partner of the mining farm.And all hashrates were out of control.
After then, FC told us that hashrates from new mining farms will be deployed, but we didn't know the amount at that time.Right now, we still don't receive any update from those new hashrates.
AMHash Team
The 3.546PH AMHash's hashrates have disappeared since 25th Dec 2014. We found this problem two days later,we asked friedcat,he said it was mining farm's maintenance issues,hashrates would come back soon.But one week later,hashrates didn't come back yet.When we asked FC again, we were told that all mining devices were robbed by the partner of the mining farm.And all hashrates were out of control.
After then, FC told us that hashrates from new mining farms will be deployed, but we didn't know the amount at that time.Right now, we still don't receive any update from those new hashrates.
AMHash Team
No not a total fabrication. I'm just interpreting it the way it is written, they no longer have control of the miners and the hosting service has diverted the miners to their own address.
Iirc their partner was hashratio.
Let me understand: You're saying that "disappeared since 25th Dec 2014" means "we just found out yesterday" and "robbed by a partner" is just a meaningless interjection in Cantonese, similar to "um, like, you know" in English?
I'm saying that according to that statement, payments to the mining address stopped on Dec. 25th. When asked, FC responded that they must be having issues and are under maintenance. We don't know if that statement was due to ignorance of the situation or was a deliberate fabrication.
When AMHASH inquired again he changed his story to say that he no longer had control of the miners and I'm assuming that the hasrate was (and is) being diverted to the owner of the facilities mining address. This is in effect the same as being stolen, though without being physically hauled off.
I agree that things look very bad and at this point I'm not holding out much hope. My original comment was just to infer that the devices might not have been physically stolen, rather just hijacked and further to suggest that it may have been due to negligence on FC's part (by not paying for hosting) and not out right theft by the hosting company.
It would be nice to get a response from Hashratio on this issue.
