Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 814. (Read 3917468 times)

sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 252
also the Last 6 and Last 12 hours charts are nice :-) (around 80 TH/s)

That's because last 6h and 12h hours charts are based on the same data as the dotted line..  Tongue Cool

*I hope you know the 6h or 12h average doesn't have to be (and probably isn't) the ACTUAL hashrate,
but the calculated hashrate based on the blocks found in that particular timeframe.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Nice! Grin




also the Last 6 and Last 12 hours charts are nice :-) (around 80 TH/s)
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 252
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
regarding the USB miners and their price drop, previous buyers of mine can order at .175 per unit. more info here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/asicminer-usb-group-buy-orders-closed-pay-for-extra-195052
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
far more interested in info new blades and hardware franchising than on orphan blocks / lack of transactions.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1094
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
OFFICIAL UPDATE

The topic of the orphaned blocks and low tx fees in AM blocks was recently addressed by the board.

Friedcat is aware of the problem and Bitfountain is working to solve it. In the meantime, it is a negligible but necessary loss.

It is not as simple as it might seem. The problem comes from peering and poor bandwidth/internet connectivity in China and software optimizations used to deal with the situation. Companies like Amazon(.cn) also suffer from these problems in China. It isn't necessarily a problem caused by the Great Firewall itself.

Thank you,

~TAT

Thanks for asking that I have been curious about it
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Quote of the week...

Beware the mirage of ASICMINER clones, and hold tight to your shares ActiveMiners.

Edit: and right on cue, their false prophet is now addressed as...

A renaissance man like FriedKen

AntiCat worshipers!

The day bitcoin ASIC companies become a religion.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 254
OFFICIAL UPDATE

It is not as simple as it might seem. The problem comes from peering and poor bandwidth/internet connectivity in China and software optimizations used to deal with the situation. Companies like Amazon(.cn) also suffer from these problems in China. It isn't necessarily a problem caused by the Great Firewall itself.

You're either TPE or not. Simple.


sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Nice. Information feels good.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
Glad to see this concern is being addressed.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
OFFICIAL UPDATE

The topic of the orphaned blocks and low tx fees in AM blocks was recently addressed by the board.

Friedcat is aware of the problem and Bitfountain is working to solve it. In the meantime, it is a negligible but necessary loss.

It is not as simple as it might seem. The problem comes from peering and poor bandwidth/internet connectivity in China and software optimizations used to deal with the situation. Companies like Amazon(.cn) also suffer from these problems in China. It isn't necessarily a problem caused by the Great Firewall itself.

Thank you,

~TAT
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Allow me to posit a conspiracy...

We do know that AM was the target of the DDoS attacks that were patched recently in bitcoin-qt. So, clearly AM's mining operation is in someone's crosshairs. It's entirely possible that there is a shadowy pool-level collision to preferentially ignore/delay acknowledgment of AM blocks, or perhaps some new form of network attack that disadvantages propagation of AM blocks. That could explain the orphan rate, and AMs use of new IPs and the lack of tagging.  Shocked Shocked Cool Grin Shocked Sad Shocked Cheesy Wink Lips sealed Lips sealed Lips sealed

Thanks for your "posit", very in-depth and intelligent.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Allow me to posit a conspiracy...

We do know that AM was the target of the DDoS attacks that were patched recently in bitcoin-qt. So, clearly AM's mining operation is in someone's crosshairs. It's entirely possible that there is a shadowy pool-level collision to preferentially ignore/delay acknowledgment of AM blocks, or perhaps some new form of network attack that disadvantages propagation of AM blocks. That could explain the orphan rate, and AMs use of new IPs and the lack of tagging.  Shocked Shocked Cool Grin Shocked Sad Shocked Cheesy Wink Lips sealed Lips sealed Lips sealed
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
AM found one!! Grin What's that, like several hours.

Oh, the good ol days.....

You're talking about blocks?
They've found more today, but just not with the ASICMINER tag. Wink

https://blockchain.info/blocks/82.1.136.194

This IP found a block for example, and added it to the address of ASICMINER.

https://blockchain.info/block-index/402738/0000000000000047c930af80cfbc3979d1f97778049d62599113880a76622297

Does anyone know why Friedcat isn't tagging them?

A few pages back, people were complaining about the orphan rate and number of transactions per block of AM mined blocks compared to others. Perhaps he's establishing new pools and VPN's closer to where the "action" is in order to see if that solves that issue? And if its a new pool, he might not have completely configured it yet.

If I (in the US) send coins to someone else, I assume that my wallet broadcasts it through its connections and those connections relay it to miners somewhere. Could it have been that most of the BTC transactions are occuring in the US and EU and wallets were just relaying to the closest nodes and mining pools (lowest latency, perhaps?) and that's why we have been seeing so few fees and so many more orphans with AM than anywhere else? And if that was the issue, wouldnt the remedy be to have nodes situated in areas where latency would be lower (fewer hops between wallets and pools) in hope of capturing more of that? Not to mention that every block is a race, so if we're even a couple nanoseconds behind getting our block included, then it becomes an orphan?

Point is, we've all been noticing issues as of late, doubtless that friedcat isn't. Perhaps he's attempting to geographically disperse his mining power and operating it through different pools, and simply not stamping new blocks with the ASICMiner stamp?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
8/1/13
Hi,

We will have a one-week time of inventory shortage. Please let the purchasers know. Thanks very much.

ps: All existing orders are executed and shipped. Don't worry.

Best regards,

friedcat

is this for the USBs?
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
8/1/13
Hi,

We will have a one-week time of inventory shortage. Please let the purchasers know. Thanks very much.

ps: All existing orders are executed and shipped. Don't worry.

Best regards,

friedcat


Passing this along from friedcat.

Sincerely,
SilentSonicBoom


+1 This is where it all begins for AM Smiley

Keep up the good work guys.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Changing avatars is currently not possible.
8/1/13
Hi,

We will have a one-week time of inventory shortage. Please let the purchasers know. Thanks very much.

ps: All existing orders are executed and shipped. Don't worry.

Best regards,

friedcat


Passing this along from friedcat.

Sincerely,
SilentSonicBoom


Nice PR, how many units went out in the most recent shipment?
donator
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Regular news from friedcat isn't needed when all is rosy in the garden. Communication becomes more important during rocky periods.
Please define rocky periods. Down and uptrends for dividends is to be expected simply due to changes in the time preferences for operational cash.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
8/1/13
Hi,

We will have a one-week time of inventory shortage. Please let the purchasers know. Thanks very much.

ps: All existing orders are executed and shipped. Don't worry.

Best regards,

friedcat


Passing this along from friedcat.

Sincerely,
SilentSonicBoom
Jump to: