Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 872. (Read 3917468 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
So everyones thoughts are simply, lets just assume that no-one finds out that AM is a real company and taxes them. Good luck to the Chinese employees when the authorities do find out! (Afterall China is such an easy place on people who break laws?)

The simple fact is that AM is a business (which by law must be registered) and it is making and selling stuff (millions of USD equivalent per month). It happens to sell this stuff denominated in something other than Renminbi, but which has a clearly calculable value in Renminbi. This is no different to mining gold or oil which is denominated in USD.

The ignorance on here is staggering. I agree it's not a problem for investors, who just care about dividends, but it will matter if the staff get jailed or the company closed because it chose to ignore local laws.

You cannot simply make something, sell it and ignore the law without consequences at some point. This same point applies to almost all Bitcoin securities. Most of these securities pass-through entire income per share, without deducting income tax on the profits (if it is a share income can only be paid from post-tax) or by withholding tax (if it is debt payments made outside the country of domicile). Of course all this may be occuring in zero-tax environments, but I highly doubt it.

They've only been around a few months, so will probably be able to get this sorted if they do it NOW, but if they don't if I was them I'd be very very scared right now about a knock on the door from the authorities.


Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh




Does he pay for his rent and electricity in bitcoins too, you think?

Such great thinkers around here.

(And yes, you DO need to report gifts larger than a certain size or exceeding a quota.)

Of course He can't pay BTC as his rent or electricity, Just BTC isn't money In China......  and anyway, FC is not eligible to pay directly tax either ,because only tax appear here is the manufacture who produce it and sold out by receiving fiats..(Most likely FC has outsource all his products to them)..



legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
I think the mining revenue is 100% transparent already...
Uh?
Of course it isn't.
A proper report would include how much he spends on hardware, on paying employees, on electricity...

I am pretty sure this Friedcat has numerous profit margin ,he can cover all his expenses by his on shares income from other 24K of shares.
He intended to be over satisfy those other shareholders, and One more thing ,if you full of doubt about his ability, then just go and dump your shares.




This is a perfect demonstration of how little you understand about Co's and how money moves around in a business. 2 x LOL


sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh

It's all about volume. In most countries you cannot legally "receive a gift" of "trade stuffs with stuffs" worth millions USD without paying tax or at least registering your deal properly.
Of course , In China is absolutely no tax duty on receiving Gift...I can buy a diamond rings no matter how much it worth and gives to my girlfriend as my girlfriend appreciate to me gives me back no matter what the size of BTC...
Volume of the transaction isn't change the basic principle of BTC that isn't recognized as money by the government! Which countries you lived that request people to pay duty when they exchange their gift??? I am highly doubt this government can be existed without riot within those angry people.

If Chinese Government stated that they recognized BTC as a money , I think this great....super good news for us...we will see BTC soon hit 10000USD.



Don't you see the difference between giving a diamond ring personally and sending thousands of devices all over the world? First, it's too noticeable for tax office and customs. And second, you can't just say that you have such many friends and send them gifts all the time.
Hey, what the differences ? of course there are no differences.... logically only when you receiving money from it we called it eligible to the tax...
For BTC ???why people think receiving BTC in China is eligible to the tax?? as long as government isn't recognized BTC as a money~~
And send to thousand of things to other people isn't mean we need pay tax
...Lot of people posting billions of item abroad each day ,did  you mean they need to pay tax?? No ,the only thing they need to pay is the post order.




 





Do you understand how laws work? It DOES mean we (and more pointedly, friedcat) need to pay tax. Do you think a company that digs gold out of the ground and then sends gold to their shareholders would be tax-exempt?

Tax codes are FAR, FAR more complex than you seem prepared to accept. This sort of circumstance is covered for anything that has a fair market exchange rate (and bitcoin does, as we are well aware).
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh

It's all about volume. In most countries you cannot legally "receive a gift" of "trade stuffs with stuffs" worth millions USD without paying tax or at least registering your deal properly.
Of course , In China is absolutely no tax duty on receiving Gift...I can buy a diamond rings no matter how much it worth and gives to my girlfriend as my girlfriend appreciate to me gives me back no matter what the size of BTC...
Volume of the transaction isn't change the basic principle of BTC that isn't recognized as money by the government! Which countries you lived that request people to pay duty when they exchange their gift??? I am highly doubt this government can be existed without riot within those angry people.

If Chinese Government stated that they recognized BTC as a money , I think this great....super good news for us...we will see BTC soon hit 10000USD.



Don't you see the difference between giving a diamond ring personally and sending thousands of devices all over the world? First, it's too noticeable for tax office and customs. And second, you can't just say that you have such many friends and send them gifts all the time.
Hey, what the differences ? of course there are no differences.... logically only when you receiving money from it we called it eligible to the tax...
For BTC ???why people think receiving BTC in China is eligible to the tax?? as long as government isn't recognized BTC as a money~~
And send to thousand of things to other people isn't mean we need pay tax ...Lot of people posting billions of item abroad each day ,did  you mean they need to pay tax?? No ,the only thing they need to pay is the post order.




 



sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
So everyones thoughts are simply, lets just assume that no-one finds out that AM is a real company and taxes them. Good luck to the Chinese employees when the authorities do find out! (Afterall China is such an easy place on people who break laws?)

The simple fact is that AM is a business (which by law must be registered) and it is making and selling stuff (millions of USD equivalent per month). It happens to sell this stuff denominated in something other than Renminbi, but which has a clearly calculable value in Renminbi. This is no different to mining gold or oil which is denominated in USD.

The ignorance on here is staggering. I agree it's not a problem for investors, who just care about dividends, but it will matter if the staff get jailed or the company closed because it chose to ignore local laws.

You cannot simply make something, sell it and ignore the law without consequences at some point. This same point applies to almost all Bitcoin securities. Most of these securities pass-through entire income per share, without deducting income tax on the profits (if it is a share income can only be paid from post-tax) or by withholding tax (if it is debt payments made outside the country of domicile). Of course all this may be occuring in zero-tax environments, but I highly doubt it.

They've only been around a few months, so will probably be able to get this sorted if they do it NOW, but if they don't if I was them I'd be very very scared right now about a knock on the door from the authorities.


Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh




Does he pay for his rent and electricity in bitcoins too, you think?

Such great thinkers around here.

(And yes, you DO need to report gifts larger than a certain size or exceeding a quota.)
full member
Activity: 223
Merit: 100

I'm pretty sure you're wrong about this, SOSLOVE868. In all countries I am familiar with, gifts are liable for tax. Barter is also liable for tax. Therefore, there is no doubt that AM profit would be taxable in many jurisdictions.
I'm not familiar with Chinese tax code, but you don't seem to be familiar with tax code in any country, SOSLOVE868.


Gift taxation is difficult problem. Especially for treasury investigators.
In Poland If you are in close relation to recipient, tax duty is lifted (to some extent). Otherwise the recipient have to calculate and pay the tax.
This construct allows you to sell couple of things, but after reaching high volume you will have difficulty explaining so many close friends..

Of course that is not a problem for a genius friedcat since there is already plenty of written evidence that almost everybody loves him.
There is even a photograph taken of grandma in love holding the blades Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh

It's all about volume. In most countries you cannot legally "receive a gift" of "trade stuffs with stuffs" worth millions USD without paying tax or at least registering your deal properly.
Of course , In China is absolutely no tax duty on receiving Gift...I can buy a diamond rings no matter how much it worth and gives to my girlfriend as my girlfriend appreciate to me gives me back no matter what the size of BTC...
Volume of the transaction isn't change the basic principle of BTC that isn't recognized as money by the government! Which countries you lived that request people to pay duty when they exchange their gift??? I am highly doubt this government can be existed without riot within those angry people.

If Chinese Government stated that they recognized BTC as a money , I think this great....super good news for us...we will see BTC soon hit 10000USD.



Don't you see the difference between giving a diamond ring personally and sending thousands of devices all over the world? First, it's too noticeable for tax office and customs. And second, you can't just say that you have such many friends and send them gifts all the time.
sr. member
Activity: 362
Merit: 250
Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh

It's all about volume. In most countries you cannot legally "receive a gift" of "trade stuffs with stuffs" worth millions USD without paying tax or at least registering your deal properly.
Of course , In China is absolutely no tax duty on receiving Gift...I can buy a diamond rings no matter how much it worth and gives to my girlfriend as my girlfriend appreciate to me gives me back no matter what the size of BTC...
Volume of the transaction isn't change the basic principle of BTC that isn't recognized as money by the government! Which countries you lived that request people to pay duty when they exchange their gift??? I am highly doubt this government can be existed without riot within those angry people.

If Chinese Government stated that they recognized BTC as a money , I think this great....super good news for us...we will see BTC soon hit 10000USD.



I'm pretty sure you're wrong about this, SOSLOVE868. In all countries I am familiar with, gifts are liable for tax. Barter is also liable for tax. Therefore, there is no doubt that AM profit would be taxable in many jurisdictions.

I'm not familiar with Chinese tax code, but you don't seem to be familiar with tax code in any country, SOSLOVE868.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh

It's all about volume. In most countries you cannot legally "receive a gift" of "trade stuffs with stuffs" worth millions USD without paying tax or at least registering your deal properly.
Of course , In China is absolutely no tax duty on receiving Gift...I can buy a diamond rings no matter how much it worth and gives to my girlfriend as my girlfriend appreciate to me gives me back no matter what the size of BTC...
Volume of the transaction isn't change the basic principle of BTC that isn't recognized as money by the government! Which countries you lived that request people to pay duty when they exchange their gift??? I am highly doubt this government can be existed without riot within those angry people.

If Chinese Government stated that they recognized BTC as a money , I think this great....super good news for us...we will see BTC soon hit 10000USD.

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh

It's all about volume. In most countries you cannot legally "receive a gift" of "trade stuffs with stuffs" worth millions USD without paying tax or at least registering your deal properly.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
So everyones thoughts are simply, lets just assume that no-one finds out that AM is a real company and taxes them.
This is a totally idiotic thing SOSLOVE suggested, but he's misinformed: friedcat has at least stated that they are mostly compliant with the laws, and where they aren't it's just because it's a grey area and couldn't do otherwise. Of course we have no way of knowing if he was sincere or he lied, as with everything regarding AM.

That said, many investors are plain stupid: not reading a report is one thing, but being "ok" with having no reports at all is foolish to say the least.

Again ,When people stay nothing to defense his argument, then they were usually says someone is stupid to approve that they are smart.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
So everyones thoughts are simply, lets just assume that no-one finds out that AM is a real company and taxes them. Good luck to the Chinese employees when the authorities do find out! (Afterall China is such an easy place on people who break laws?)

The simple fact is that AM is a business (which by law must be registered) and it is making and selling stuff (millions of USD equivalent per month). It happens to sell this stuff denominated in something other than Renminbi, but which has a clearly calculable value in Renminbi. This is no different to mining gold or oil which is denominated in USD.

The ignorance on here is staggering. I agree it's not a problem for investors, who just care about dividends, but it will matter if the staff get jailed or the company closed because it chose to ignore local laws.

You cannot simply make something, sell it and ignore the law without consequences at some point. This same point applies to almost all Bitcoin securities. Most of these securities pass-through entire income per share, without deducting income tax on the profits (if it is a share income can only be paid from post-tax) or by withholding tax (if it is debt payments made outside the country of domicile). Of course all this may be occuring in zero-tax environments, but I highly doubt it.

They've only been around a few months, so will probably be able to get this sorted if they do it NOW, but if they don't if I was them I'd be very very scared right now about a knock on the door from the authorities.


Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh


sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
So everyones thoughts are simply, lets just assume that no-one finds out that AM is a real company and taxes them.
This is a totally idiotic thing SOSLOVE suggested, but he's misinformed: friedcat has at least stated that they are mostly compliant with the laws, and where they aren't it's just because it's a grey area and couldn't do otherwise. Of course we have no way of knowing if he was sincere or he lied, as with everything regarding AM.

That said, many investors are plain stupid: not reading a report is one thing, but being "ok" with having no reports at all is foolish to say the least.

Dividends is our report....If dividend gone ,I do not need a detailed somewhat report to explaining what the reason causing dividend gone ...
Please be more realistic and concerning to what game you are playing ...please ...Your suggestion is only comply with real stock market.
And as I stated that Share price only correlated with dividend, A report will not securing the share price...what we need is under extremely situations FriedCat can show up within time and tells us what happening ,this really enough...

 
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
So everyones thoughts are simply, lets just assume that no-one finds out that AM is a real company and taxes them.
This is a totally idiotic thing SOSLOVE suggested, but he's misinformed: friedcat has at least stated that they are mostly compliant with the laws, and where they aren't it's just because it's a grey area and couldn't do otherwise. Of course we have no way of knowing if he was sincere or he lied, as with everything regarding AM.

That said, many investors are plain stupid: not reading a report is one thing, but being "ok" with having no reports at all is foolish to say the least.
sr. member
Activity: 298
Merit: 250
So everyones thoughts are simply, lets just assume that no-one finds out that AM is a real company and taxes them. Good luck to the Chinese employees when the authorities do find out! (Afterall China is such an easy place on people who break laws?)

The simple fact is that AM is a business (which by law must be registered) and it is making and selling stuff (millions of USD equivalent per month). It happens to sell this stuff denominated in something other than Renminbi, but which has a clearly calculable value in Renminbi. This is no different to mining gold or oil which is denominated in USD.

The ignorance on here is staggering. I agree it's not a problem for investors, who just care about dividends, but it will matter if the staff get jailed or the company closed because it chose to ignore local laws.

You cannot simply make something, sell it and ignore the law without consequences at some point. This same point applies to almost all Bitcoin securities. Most of these securities pass-through entire income per share, without deducting income tax on the profits (if it is a share income can only be paid from post-tax) or by withholding tax (if it is debt payments made outside the country of domicile). Of course all this may be occuring in zero-tax environments, but I highly doubt it.

They've only been around a few months, so will probably be able to get this sorted if they do it NOW, but if they don't if I was them I'd be very very scared right now about a knock on the door from the authorities.

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
I think the point about finance is well-made and of repeated concern. AM is clearly doing amazingly well on building chips, mining and selling, but it just feels like there's too much of this $200m company that is about the tech-stuff and too little about proper corporate governance and reporting.

The simple fact is that no proper reports have ever been produced as I can see it. Now maybe some things should remain 'inside the firm', for business reasons, but most public or private firms at least produce decent management information on a monthly basis and usually share it with shareholders on a quarterly basis.

I own a small piece in a global company that is still private and get a quarterly report of one page that covers updates and outline finances. My own private (multi-offshore structured) company reports proper management accounts (P&L, BS, Cashflow) monthly. It's easy.

Add-in the fact that transfers are still being emailed to the founder even for a few shares, shows that perhaps some areas could be improved by delegating to properly skilled workers and clearly the company can afford it. At some point it needs to report sales taxes and profits to the tax authorities as well as taxes due on employees wages etc?Huh?? Is it even doing so??

I'm sure there are plenty of people who could help who are shareholders (I offered but never received a reply).

Maybe they're already doing it, but they need to start acting like a proper business and solve the issues of reporting, taxation, corporate structure and governance, off-shore location. If they don't do this then they are risking the business needlessly.

Maybe I'm wrong and all this is happening, but with the greatest of respect to them right now it just doesn't feel like it, these are all problems that can be solved within days by people with experience.

As no matter how high is the share price ,that isn't concerning by FriedCat ,because his companies only received the fund from IPO which is around 16400BTC.
(I do not believe he can manage a debt loan with his shares)
The rest of things ,is he trying to keeps his promises to the community by over delivery our expectations by make things as simple as possible.
Other aspect is: share price could be dump as long as 1 BTC in one day or vice versa. Market cap means less important in this game ,only thing is as long as it maintaining its 30% annual return. (and this 30% could be contribute by less money pay for accountant service.)

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
I think the point about finance is well-made and of repeated concern. AM is clearly doing amazingly well on building chips, mining and selling, but it just feels like there's too much of this $200m company that is about the tech-stuff and too little about proper corporate governance and reporting.

The simple fact is that no proper reports have ever been produced as I can see it. Now maybe some things should remain 'inside the firm', for business reasons, but most public or private firms at least produce decent management information on a monthly basis and usually share it with shareholders on a quarterly basis.

I own a small piece in a global company that is still private and get a quarterly report of one page that covers updates and outline finances. My own private (multi-offshore structured) company reports proper management accounts (P&L, BS, Cashflow) monthly. It's easy.

Add-in the fact that transfers are still being emailed to the founder even for a few shares, shows that perhaps some areas could be improved by delegating to properly skilled workers and clearly the company can afford it. At some point it needs to report sales taxes and profits to the tax authorities as well as taxes due on employees wages etc?Huh?? Is it even doing so??

I'm sure there are plenty of people who could help who are shareholders (I offered but never received a reply).

Maybe they're already doing it, but they need to start acting like a proper business and solve the issues of reporting, taxation, corporate structure and governance, off-shore location. If they don't do this then they are risking the business needlessly.

Maybe I'm wrong and all this is happening, but with the greatest of respect to them right now it just doesn't feel like it, these are all problems that can be solved within days by people with experience.
There are no tax requirement for income from virtual currency in China....Your opinion is a step forward.
And AM has a market cap of 200 millions, so what ? they may not a real business that registered with Chinese government , because no regulation indicate they need to do so~~This game is very simple , if you request everything become officially and everything is endorsement by government authority.It looks something will only happening when BTC really hit mainstream...I highly doubt all those rules which comply by normal businesses in real world, can be complied as same as a virtual business in BTC. If everything become officially and backed by government endorsement, then you will never see a return of 30% per year. it will becoming the same as most companies in stock market, may be 3% per year??
For the risk and reward, you should be aware before join this game...everything is virtual even the companies itself... if you worry too much , you can go back to NYE or where ever you like..



Exactly. I want juicy dividends, not some useless "reports". Dividends are my reports and they are pretty good. As long as dividends pay, friedcat can sit with his thumb up his nose for all I care.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
I think the mining revenue is 100% transparent already...
Uh?
Of course it isn't.
A proper report would include how much he spends on hardware, on paying employees, on electricity...

I am pretty sure this Friedcat has numerous profit margin ,he can cover all his expenses by his on shares income from other 24K of shares.
He intended to be over satisfy those other shareholders, and One more thing ,if you full of doubt about his ability, then just go and dump your shares.

Agreed. The main issue is trust and friedcat/AsicMiner has delivered above and beyond my expectations. Hardware is delivered in a timely fashion, hashrate is adjusted to match network increase, and dividends on shares are paid weekly like clockwork. Financials are nice, but results are even better Cheesy

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
I think the point about finance is well-made and of repeated concern. AM is clearly doing amazingly well on building chips, mining and selling, but it just feels like there's too much of this $200m company that is about the tech-stuff and too little about proper corporate governance and reporting.

The simple fact is that no proper reports have ever been produced as I can see it. Now maybe some things should remain 'inside the firm', for business reasons, but most public or private firms at least produce decent management information on a monthly basis and usually share it with shareholders on a quarterly basis.

I own a small piece in a global company that is still private and get a quarterly report of one page that covers updates and outline finances. My own private (multi-offshore structured) company reports proper management accounts (P&L, BS, Cashflow) monthly. It's easy.

Add-in the fact that transfers are still being emailed to the founder even for a few shares, shows that perhaps some areas could be improved by delegating to properly skilled workers and clearly the company can afford it. At some point it needs to report sales taxes and profits to the tax authorities as well as taxes due on employees wages etc?Huh?? Is it even doing so??

I'm sure there are plenty of people who could help who are shareholders (I offered but never received a reply).

Maybe they're already doing it, but they need to start acting like a proper business and solve the issues of reporting, taxation, corporate structure and governance, off-shore location. If they don't do this then they are risking the business needlessly.

Maybe I'm wrong and all this is happening, but with the greatest of respect to them right now it just doesn't feel like it, these are all problems that can be solved within days by people with experience.
There are no tax requirement for income from virtual currency in China....Your opinion is a step forward.
And AM has a market cap of 200 millions, so what ? they may not a real business that registered with Chinese government , because no regulation indicate they need to do so~~This game is very simple , if you request everything become officially and everything is endorsement by government authority.It looks something will only happening when BTC really hit mainstream...I highly doubt all those rules which comply by normal businesses in real world, can be complied as same as a virtual business in BTC. If everything become officially and backed by government endorsement, then you will never see a return of 30% per year. it will becoming the same as most companies in stock market, may be 3% per year??
For the risk and reward, you should be aware before join this game...everything is virtual even the companies itself... if you worry too much , you can go back to NYE or where ever you like..

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
I think the mining revenue is 100% transparent already...
Uh?
Of course it isn't.
A proper report would include how much he spends on hardware, on paying employees, on electricity...

I am pretty sure this Friedcat has numerous profit margin ,he can cover all his expenses by his on shares income from other 24K of shares.
He intended to be over satisfy those other shareholders, and One more thing ,if you full of doubt about his ability, then just go and dump your shares.
Jump to: