Yes I understand that some manual parts will remain but it would mean that campaign managers won't be able to justify charging $5-10k for managing a campaign. Especially since we're going to open this service up for free.
Eventually I can hook it into an AI or spam filter for better results but that would cost some money. For now I'll just keep improving the post detection algorithm but as mentioned before, you can invalidate posts manually in two clicks.
Topic: [ASK BITCOINTALK] How many of you would use this service? - page 2. (Read 827 times)
This is an interesting service and could be used as assistance but could in no way replace manual labor for checking the quality of posts. This is something that actually requires a lot of intelligence, any bot could be abused.
This system can be time-saving for sure but still, need a human action to check what an automated system can't. I was participating in a campaign using a similar system but still needed a human behind.
You can set a length per post to be considered as a valid post, but a bot cannot decide if what the user is posting is good enough.
Both are already implemented as you can see in the screenshots. You can even invalidade a post manually if the quality isn't good enought.You can set a length per post to be considered as a valid post, but a bot cannot decide if what the user is posting is good enough.
I remember a campaign sometimes ago using only an automated system, and I think they suddenly stopped after some days and have never come back. I can guess why
BitMixer? The campaign stopped because they closed their services.Can your system exclude quote as well? Because there are some experts here filling their posts with quotes.
Already answered:
The bot will even remove Quoted text from post count length calculations when checking if it meets minimum requirements.
This system can be time-saving for sure but still, need a human action to check what an automated system can't. I was participating in a campaign using a similar system but still needed a human behind.
You can set a length per post to be considered as a valid post, but a bot cannot decide if what the user is posting is good enough.
Can your system exclude quote as well? Because there are some experts here filling their posts with quotes.
I remember a campaign sometimes ago using only an automated system, and I think they suddenly stopped after some days and have never come back. I can guess why
You can set a length per post to be considered as a valid post, but a bot cannot decide if what the user is posting is good enough.
Can your system exclude quote as well? Because there are some experts here filling their posts with quotes.
I remember a campaign sometimes ago using only an automated system, and I think they suddenly stopped after some days and have never come back. I can guess why
We are likely going to make this service free for a bit to demonstrate that it's useful while at the same time slightly advertising PrivCoin.io
Hey users, as many of you know PrivCoin ( https://privcoin.io ) is gearing up to do a signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22111914
I think I've seen your review campaign but unfortunately I've missed it.
Your service seems pretty usefull but how about adding any kind of quality check function? Something like plagiarism checker comparing user's posts with the other posts in the thread.
If i were running a signature campaign i believe this is going to make everyone's life easier. The campaign manager/administrator of the site can not have to look through all posts of every single user and can semi-automate the process.
I read up to your thread about campaign managers asking for crazy pay - don't hire them if you think the rates are ridiculously high. You can do tihs yourself, as long as you keep to the standards of the forum.
Obviously it's recommended that you get a campaign manager, though. But 900% increase in your running costs is pretty ridiculous.
I read up to your thread about campaign managers asking for crazy pay - don't hire them if you think the rates are ridiculously high. You can do tihs yourself, as long as you keep to the standards of the forum.
Obviously it's recommended that you get a campaign manager, though. But 900% increase in your running costs is pretty ridiculous.
Quoted so you could see the images. As a newbie they won't show up for you. Check back in a couple of weeks and they'll be there.
Just an FYI, as I'm sure you already know, these bots are really frowned upon because other crappy bots have been used. Assuming yours is the next best thing since sliced bread you shouldn't have an issue. 90% automation sounds right about where you should be. I would also suggest a public bounty offered for fidning spammers in your signature campaign.
Just an FYI, as I'm sure you already know, these bots are really frowned upon because other crappy bots have been used. Assuming yours is the next best thing since sliced bread you shouldn't have an issue. 90% automation sounds right about where you should be. I would also suggest a public bounty offered for fidning spammers in your signature campaign.
Thanks for the image fix!
If you've used our mixer or unknowingly used our other services we don't advertise here then you'll know everything we make is the best thing since sliced bread.
The bot will even remove Quoted text from post count length calculations when checking if it meets minimum requirements.
Finding spammers will be up to a hired post quality checker or we may task one of our team members to do it ourselves.
Hey users, as many of you know PrivCoin ( https://privcoin.io ) is gearing up to do a signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22111914
We posted a topic asking for quotes on management fees and some of them were frankly outrageous in our opinion. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22076450
So we built a tool to do 90% of the work for us. How many of you running signature campaigns would pay a tiny fee to use this to run your own campaign? Some of the images below contain things that require Administrator permissions and sorry they aren't embedded images I think my user group doesn't have the right permissions. Mods/Admins help?
Let's register to the PrivCoin signature campaign
But we never added a Bitcoin address to our profile, so there's no way to receive payouts!
Now we added an address but not using the prescribed signature!
Finally we got it right!
Let's look at the users that applied, maybe we want to accept one
Let's look at the campaign overview for this week
Now I want to look up hilariousandco because I'm a nosy person
He has some invalid posts, let's see what they are and why they got shot down and by who so I can complain
Now let's look at his valid posts, I want to make sure they're worth paying for!
I found one that was garbage, let's remove it from his running total.
Not shown here: Kicking users, approving users.
What do you think? Would you pay to use this to run your own campaign and reduce manager fees?
We posted a topic asking for quotes on management fees and some of them were frankly outrageous in our opinion. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22076450
So we built a tool to do 90% of the work for us. How many of you running signature campaigns would pay a tiny fee to use this to run your own campaign? Some of the images below contain things that require Administrator permissions and sorry they aren't embedded images I think my user group doesn't have the right permissions. Mods/Admins help?
Let's register to the PrivCoin signature campaign
But we never added a Bitcoin address to our profile, so there's no way to receive payouts!
Now we added an address but not using the prescribed signature!
Finally we got it right!
Let's look at the users that applied, maybe we want to accept one
Let's look at the campaign overview for this week
Now I want to look up hilariousandco because I'm a nosy person
He has some invalid posts, let's see what they are and why they got shot down and by who so I can complain
Now let's look at his valid posts, I want to make sure they're worth paying for!
I found one that was garbage, let's remove it from his running total.
Not shown here: Kicking users, approving users.
What do you think? Would you pay to use this to run your own campaign and reduce manager fees?
Quoted so you could see the images. As a newbie they won't show up for you. Check back in a couple of weeks and they'll be there.
Just an FYI, as I'm sure you already know, these bots are really frowned upon because other crappy bots have been used. Assuming yours is the next best thing since sliced bread you shouldn't have an issue. 90% automation sounds right about where you should be. I would also suggest a public bounty offered for fidning spammers in your signature campaign.
Hey users, as many of you know PrivCoin ( https://privcoin.io ) is gearing up to do a signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22111914
We posted a topic asking for quotes on management fees and some of them were frankly outrageous in our opinion. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22076450
So we built a tool to do 90% of the work for us. How many of you running signature campaigns would pay a tiny fee to use this to run your own campaign? Some of the images below contain things that require Administrator permissions and sorry they aren't embedded images I think my user group doesn't have the right permissions. Mods/Admins help?
Let's register to the PrivCoin signature campaign
But we never added a Bitcoin address to our profile, so there's no way to receive payouts!
Now we added an address but not using the prescribed signature!
Finally we got it right!
Let's look at the users that applied, maybe we want to accept one
Let's look at the campaign overview for this week
Now I want to look up hilariousandco because I'm a nosy person
He has some invalid posts, let's see what they are and why they got shot down and by who so I can complain
Now let's look at his valid posts, I want to make sure they're worth paying for!
I found one that was garbage, let's remove it from his running total.
Not shown here: Kicking users, approving users.
What do you think? Would you pay to use this to run your own campaign and reduce manager fees?
We posted a topic asking for quotes on management fees and some of them were frankly outrageous in our opinion. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22076450
So we built a tool to do 90% of the work for us. How many of you running signature campaigns would pay a tiny fee to use this to run your own campaign? Some of the images below contain things that require Administrator permissions and sorry they aren't embedded images I think my user group doesn't have the right permissions. Mods/Admins help?
Let's register to the PrivCoin signature campaign
But we never added a Bitcoin address to our profile, so there's no way to receive payouts!
Now we added an address but not using the prescribed signature!
Finally we got it right!
Let's look at the users that applied, maybe we want to accept one
Let's look at the campaign overview for this week
Now I want to look up hilariousandco because I'm a nosy person
He has some invalid posts, let's see what they are and why they got shot down and by who so I can complain
Now let's look at his valid posts, I want to make sure they're worth paying for!
I found one that was garbage, let's remove it from his running total.
Not shown here: Kicking users, approving users.
What do you think? Would you pay to use this to run your own campaign and reduce manager fees?
Jump to: