Being a Jr member is sufficient to post discussion? because I saw in an article that we should have 60 posts and spend 6 hours at least to upgrade your account if your trust is good. Thank you
I was going to delete your post, but there is so much wrong with it, that I thought it was better to comment. This is an information and training thread after all. So here are my comment.
- Your post is on the first index page, and yet you quoted the opening post in full, and there was no real reference to the content. This is really annoying and bulks up the thread for no purpose.
- Despite the quote, you don't seem to have read the opening post and understood it. Had you done so, you would have realised that this account is a training alternative account for Jet Cash, and he is a legendary member.
- Rank is not a restriction on starting discussion posts, but if you are a new member in the Bitcoin Talk forum, you should encure that it is a good and informative discussion, and that you have a reasonable knowledge of the topic.
- Number of posts, and hours spent in the forum are no indication of a quality poster. There are many members who have made hundreds of posts, and they are low value spam writings, and they really ought to stop and do a bit of reading.
- The original purpose of the trust system was to help establish the honesty of traders, however account selling has meant that you need to verify a good trust rating before risking any asserts. Recently it has been used to indicate reputation and the moral fibre of a member. The theory is that a merit cheat or abuser, or an account dealer is prepared to work agianst the spirit of the forum, and therefor he may be preoared to chet members in trading. It can also affect bounty earnings, and the bounty manager may consider negative trust as a possible indication of bounty programme fraud.
- A low post count, and a long time spent on the board can indicate one of two things. An intelligent member with a thirst for knowledge, who has spent his time reading threads rather than posting spm and uninformed comments. Or it could indicte a surfer who leaves the forum open in a background browser window, and spends his time gambling or playing games. Neither of these activities is likely to help him to make constructive posts.