lot of stuff to chew...
Topic: AT vs. Ethereum - what direction are we headed in? - page 2. (Read 3338 times)
Yes link is up and running again.
Here you can see the main specs: http://www.ciyam.org/at/at.html
and the API calls here: http://www.ciyam.org/at/at_api.html
You will also notice some tests. These tests are using the older version of the AT as well as some of the use cases are using the old API and they will be updated soon.
Also there is a link to the .cpp prototype. http://www.ciyam.org/at/_at.cpp.html
We will be glad to answer any questions regarding the provided informations.
Here you can see the main specs: http://www.ciyam.org/at/at.html
and the API calls here: http://www.ciyam.org/at/at_api.html
You will also notice some tests. These tests are using the older version of the AT as well as some of the use cases are using the old API and they will be updated soon.
Also there is a link to the .cpp prototype. http://www.ciyam.org/at/_at.cpp.html
We will be glad to answer any questions regarding the provided informations.
For AT you can see the design here: http://ciyam.org/at
The first document is the main technical description of how AT works.
The first document is the main technical description of how AT works.
Link should be fine now.
I can resolve ciyam to 69.160.255.187 but destination host is unreachable.
Yes - maybe we are being attacked by those that don't want to see us succeed (it should be working again in a few minutes).
how are you guys securing the blockchain? what is the consensus mechanism ?
AT is blockchain "agnostic" (so it doesn't care how the host blockchain does that).
I still don't see why I should invest in anything that isn't MAIDSafe, it's the original project (started in 2006) and has lots of interesting stuff already shown. How are the other MAID alternatives any better?
Can you link me the white paper?
For AT you can see the design here: http://ciyam.org/at
The first document is the main technical description of how AT works.
sanks!
EDIT: sorry dawg, it doesn't work!
I can resolve ciyam to 69.160.255.187 but destination host is unreachable.
tubes are clogged
how are you guys securing the blockchain? what is the consensus mechanism ?
Can you link me the white paper?
For AT you can see the design here: http://ciyam.org/at
The first document is the main technical description of how AT works.
Interestingly it seems that CIYAM is being DDoS attacked right now.
Some people may already be aware that AT has been launched on a mainnet (via the Burst altcoin - http://www.theuknews.com/index.php/nav/newsr/5228) providing Turing complete "smart contracts" including the world's first decentralised Lottery (which is already running).
Whilst CIYAM Developers have *zero* VC funding nor any IPO funds we have however managed to create our "smart contracts" implementation and see it through to launching on a mainnet in a relatively short space of time (no easy feat)
It has been noted that the fact that currently ATs have to be written in an "assembly" language makes them not easy to develop but at the same time it should be noted that we are looking into using LLVM in order to allow ATs to be written in C or C++.
The Ethereum project have not only decided to not use any well known high level language (they have created their own) but they are also now forking a web browser (something that we have no plan to do as we think most people are simply not going to want to change their browser).
Also AT has been designed from the start to work on multiple blockchains (i.e. relatively easy to integrate with any alt and will get easier as we progress) and we plan to be able to demonstrate an "atomic cross-chain transfer" within the next month.
It is a "David vs. Goliath" issue that we face but we feel that providing a system that supports major existing high level programming languages and all main browsers and allowing all blockchains to join in is perhaps something that might be more appealing to the devs in this field compared to the Ethereum approach.
Your comments are welcome.
Whilst CIYAM Developers have *zero* VC funding nor any IPO funds we have however managed to create our "smart contracts" implementation and see it through to launching on a mainnet in a relatively short space of time (no easy feat)
It has been noted that the fact that currently ATs have to be written in an "assembly" language makes them not easy to develop but at the same time it should be noted that we are looking into using LLVM in order to allow ATs to be written in C or C++.
The Ethereum project have not only decided to not use any well known high level language (they have created their own) but they are also now forking a web browser (something that we have no plan to do as we think most people are simply not going to want to change their browser).
Also AT has been designed from the start to work on multiple blockchains (i.e. relatively easy to integrate with any alt and will get easier as we progress) and we plan to be able to demonstrate an "atomic cross-chain transfer" within the next month.
It is a "David vs. Goliath" issue that we face but we feel that providing a system that supports major existing high level programming languages and all main browsers and allowing all blockchains to join in is perhaps something that might be more appealing to the devs in this field compared to the Ethereum approach.
Your comments are welcome.
Can you link me the white paper?
Well, I didn't say alts don't have mainnet, but it's still a bit misleading.
I'd be keen to know why you still think it is misleading (we have no intention to mislead anyone).
In any case, I personally have no idea nor any desire to find out what Ethereum is. As for your project, what exactly is it useful for?
It allows people to create general "smart contracts" so the exact same use that Ethereum has. Also we have developed an "atomic cross-chain transfer" AT that will allow for peer to peer trading of digital currencies *without a trusted 3rd party*. I think that has at least some real worth to people.
As to creating a new "high-level language" we are not doing that (but Ethereum is).
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
A bit misleading when you say mainnet but it's an alt.
Not sure why that is misleading - we have never said that it is running on Bitcoin.
(so you are saying that alts don't have mainnet's at all?)
I don't think Ethereum is going to be launching on Bitcoin either (or do have evidence that they are going to do that?).
In any case, I personally have no idea nor any desire to find out what Ethereum is. As for your project, what exactly is it useful for(to the point where it is necessary to create a new high-level programming language)?
A bit misleading when you say mainnet but it's an alt.
Not sure why that is misleading - we have never said that it is running on Bitcoin.
(so you are saying that alts don't have mainnet's at all?)
I don't think Ethereum is going to be launching on Bitcoin either (or do have evidence that they are going to do that?).
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
A bit misleading when you say mainnet but it's an alt.
We have a very simple policy - we don't *hire* people (be they from a GS background or any other).
Instead we promote the idea that those that are interested in the project can contribute (with actual coding or other useful things).
Instead we promote the idea that those that are interested in the project can contribute (with actual coding or other useful things).
/begin rant
I think it's interesting that in the us gov, at very high levels, including the treasury, we have a bunch of former goldmansachs employees.
They are " former" employees.
Then when their gov term is up they often get rehired. This known as the revolving door. It is this revolving door that has blurred the lines between golmansachs and the us treasury, they might as well be one and the same.
Etherium has 2 "former" goldmansachs employees. "Former" employees, until they get rehired.
Who the fuck are they fooling? Maybe a 20 year old vitalik?
/End rant..
Good job CIYAM very impressive.
I think it's interesting that in the us gov, at very high levels, including the treasury, we have a bunch of former goldmansachs employees.
They are " former" employees.
Then when their gov term is up they often get rehired. This known as the revolving door. It is this revolving door that has blurred the lines between golmansachs and the us treasury, they might as well be one and the same.
Etherium has 2 "former" goldmansachs employees. "Former" employees, until they get rehired.
Who the fuck are they fooling? Maybe a 20 year old vitalik?
/End rant..
Good job CIYAM very impressive.
Some people may already be aware that AT has been launched on a mainnet (via the Burst altcoin - http://www.theuknews.com/index.php/nav/newsr/5228) providing Turing complete "smart contracts" including the world's first decentralised Lottery (which is already running).
Whilst CIYAM Developers have *zero* VC funding nor any IPO funds we have however managed to create our "smart contracts" implementation and see it through to launching on a mainnet in a relatively short space of time (no easy feat)
It has been noted that the fact that currently ATs have to be written in an "assembly" language makes them not easy to develop but at the same time it should be noted that we are looking into using LLVM in order to allow ATs to be written in C or C++.
The Ethereum project have not only decided to not use any well known high level language (they have created their own) but they are also now forking a web browser (something that we have no plan to do as we think most people are simply not going to want to change their browser).
Also AT has been designed from the start to work on multiple blockchains (i.e. relatively easy to integrate with any alt and will get easier as we progress) and we plan to be able to demonstrate an "atomic cross-chain transfer" within the next month.
It is a "David vs. Goliath" issue that we face but we feel that providing a system that supports major existing high level programming languages and all main browsers and allowing all blockchains to join in is perhaps something that might be more appealing to the devs in this field compared to the Ethereum approach.
AT documentation can be found here: http://ciyam.org/at (and yes it is rather technical)
Your comments are welcome.
Whilst CIYAM Developers have *zero* VC funding nor any IPO funds we have however managed to create our "smart contracts" implementation and see it through to launching on a mainnet in a relatively short space of time (no easy feat)
It has been noted that the fact that currently ATs have to be written in an "assembly" language makes them not easy to develop but at the same time it should be noted that we are looking into using LLVM in order to allow ATs to be written in C or C++.
The Ethereum project have not only decided to not use any well known high level language (they have created their own) but they are also now forking a web browser (something that we have no plan to do as we think most people are simply not going to want to change their browser).
Also AT has been designed from the start to work on multiple blockchains (i.e. relatively easy to integrate with any alt and will get easier as we progress) and we plan to be able to demonstrate an "atomic cross-chain transfer" within the next month.
It is a "David vs. Goliath" issue that we face but we feel that providing a system that supports major existing high level programming languages and all main browsers and allowing all blockchains to join in is perhaps something that might be more appealing to the devs in this field compared to the Ethereum approach.
AT documentation can be found here: http://ciyam.org/at (and yes it is rather technical)
Your comments are welcome.
Jump to: