Every single campaign, where funds are not fully escrowed by the manager or an escrow is risky[1]. Knowingly applying to such a campaign implies that the user has read the campaign description, is aware of the-, and accepts the- risk. In case that the user failed to read the campaign description, then it is only the users fault.
[1] This does not guarantee 100% safety either.
Why is it good aTriz doesn't escrow funds according to you?
Apparently, you did not get Lauda perfectly well. Last time I checked, not all campaigns are escrowed by the managers and they always make sure that whoever is applying understands that before doing so.
I was part of the Confido's campaign, and at the beginning, it was clearly stated by aTriz that none of the funds are being escrowed by him, so it is more like anyone joining is obviously joining at his/her own risk. So, if you want to blame aTriz for Confido's scam, you should as well blame yourself for joining in the first place since you knew it wasn't escrowed and no one was forced to join.
This is not true. They were supposed to get paid if Confido did raise $50,000. Well, their ICO came and raised over $300,000. You could even see there token what is was worth in the ICO launch, over $1 value. aTriz is responsible because he is the manage of the campaign who promised they would get payment if over $50,000 got raised, but they never got payment though $300,000+ is raised.