It might be a good idea to do some proactive measures while it's still fairly simple politically to do changes to the protocol - SegWit+LN, larger blocks, something else?
A lot of the future proofing was already done in the changeover to multi-algo. Many of the issues with BTC right now are the long block times and the sheer number of transactions that are occurring per block. AUR should have 10 blocks on the chain in just longer than the time it takes for BTC to have 1 block, meaning transactions over time per block should be smaller compared to BTC. It would take years before AUR ever got to a point where it would be close to hitting the hard limits that BTC has in terms of blockchain capabilities, and by that time a lot of the technology out right now would be obsolete.
Politically speaking, AUR won't run into the same red vs blue/black vs white BS that BTC is going through with what to do when things don't work. Bitcoin is in a place where there are more technical users and miners than there are mom and pop coffee shop customers, which is BTC's downfall right now in finding a solution. Too many chiefs, not enough indians. The team has discussed a lot of the future change protocols, and we've been working out plans on how to adapt to needed changes while still involving the community in decision making. Not saying that every change is going to require a community vote, though. But lets be honest here. Most people who will be a part of the "mass adoption" won't ever touch a miner or the technical side of the blockchain. They won't care what the change is that makes the chain work, they just want the chain to work.
-Fuse