Pages:
Author

Topic: [BAKEWELL] Action Proposal - Call for Volunteers - page 2. (Read 7747 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye
I have 1 (yes, just 1) share of bakewell, so I guess I'll register.

I have 3 (yes, just 3) shares of bakewell, so I guess I'll register too.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
I have 1 (yes, just 1) share of bakewell, so I guess I'll register.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026
Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012
Updated shareholder list:

Carnth-  194
Evolvex-   111
fourd00rgtz-   300
johnny5-  82
iCEBREAKER-  110
Klaus_FFM-   230
MikeMark-   300
nameFace-   252
Razcnah-   730
scrybe-  966
strello-   97
tolan77-  75
tulkos-  483
wisard-  1123
usagi-  294

And if you haven't seen it, take a look at the original Bakewell thread:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-ipo-bakewell-finally-a-transparent-investment-that-will-grow-104489

Thanks to John K

Updated shareholder list (Descending Order):

wisard-  1123
scrybe-  966
Razcnah-   730
tulkos-  483
fourd00rgtz-   300
MikeMark-   300
usagi-  294
nameFace-   252
Klaus_FFM-   230
Carnth-  194
Evolvex-   111
iCEBREAKER-  110
strello-   97
johnny5-  82
tolan77-  75

full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 101
Updated shareholder list:

Carnth-  194
Evolvex-   111
fourd00rgtz-   300
johnny5-  82
iCEBREAKER-  110
Klaus_FFM-   230
MikeMark-   300
nameFace-   252
Razcnah-   730
scrybe-  966
strello-   97
tolan77-  75
tulkos-  483
wisard-  1123
usagi-  294

And if you haven't seen it, take a look at the original Bakewell thread:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-ipo-bakewell-finally-a-transparent-investment-that-will-grow-104489

Thanks to John K
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
I have a meager 82 shares of BAKEWELL, but count me in.  Let me know if I can do anything to help.
hero member
Activity: 634
Merit: 500
I have 194 shares of BAKEWELL.
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 101
usagi-  294
tulkos-  483
strello-   97
iCEBREAKER-  110
fourd00rgtz-   300
MikeMark-   300
nameFace-   252
wisard-  1123
Evolvex-   111
Razcnah   730
scrybe-  966
Klaus Franke-   230
tolan77-  75
Carnth-  194
full member
Activity: 179
Merit: 100
Bitcoin: money chosen by the market.
I just pulled the Bakewell Asset list into a Google Fusion Table.

Now it is preserved in another location.


Because bitfloor, I've changed my payout address.  Please update!  Thanks.
Updated to reflect current.  Smiley
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 101
Updated shareholder list:

usagi-  294
tulkos-  483
strello-   97
iCEBREAKER-  110
fourd00rgtz-   300
MikeMark-   300
nameFace-   252
wisard-  1123
Evolvex-   111
Razcnah   730
scrybe-  966
Klaus Franke-   230
tolan77-  75

full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 101
To Ian Bakewell.

Ian, on April 1st, 2013, you froze the Bakewell asset on Bitfunder, telling Ukyo that you would be contacting and dealing with the shareholders to quote from your skype conversation with Ukyo:

"I will be dealing with the company through the forum from now on."

Not one of the shareholders has heard anything from you since that date.

The shareholder group, now demands that you contact us to discuss the future of Bakewell.

Please PM nameface, strello, wisard, MikeMark, fourd00rgtz, or scrybe, as they are the most active of the shareholders online.

We demand you respond to this message before 12.00 UTC Wednesday April 24th 2013.

If you don't respond by that time, we will be taking further steps to recover funds and assets that you have stolen from us.

This message has been posted to the original Bakewell thread, and emailed to your known email address, [email protected].
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 101
New shareholder- validated by emailing me screenshots of all his Bitfunder pages.

Klaus Franke- 230 shares
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 101

I advise we keep discussions in PM until we have a good concrete idea.

No use adding to confusion over here.

Thanks Usagi.

+10
sr. member
Activity: 272
Merit: 250
When I said:

Quote
I don't mind either TradeFortress or Dalkore heading this.

That wasn't a vote. That was trying to discuss and get a consensus.

(For voting to be considered legitimate, we need to make sure that the person voting has that many shares that he has claimed too.)

Anyways, I've spoken with Ukyo - and there were a couple of ideas that were discussed as to the new CEO thing. I've send that along to Strello in a PM. I advise we keep discussions in PM until we have a good concrete idea.

No use adding to confusion over here.

Thanks Usagi.
vip
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
13
I've sent out the interim CEO/ spokesman ballot list to all shareholders, asking for any more suggestions, and I'm waiting for responses to that including yours. However if you wish, I can accept that with your last post you have agreed to the Ballot list and cast your vote for TradeFortress.

But we already took a vote for that.

Shareholder update: The following shareholders want a motion run to give the CEO seat to TradeFortress. This is the right of the shareholders.

 294 usagi
 483 tulkos
  97 strello
unk. iCEBREAKER
 300 fourd00rgtz
 300 MikeMark
 252 NameFace
1123 wisard
 111 Evolvex
 730 Razcnah

----
3690 61.5%

The motion would still need to be run to make it official. Haven't heard anything from Ukyo yet. I don't have time to pursue this anymore because I have some extra hours at my job recently so someone else will need to take the mantle. I've done what I set out to do (get the ball rolling) now's the time for the whole 'step up and do your part' thing. Someone needs to contact the relevant people (and police if necessary) and what not. Good luck!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1822746

With the above 110 shares from iCEBREAKER and the new 230 we have 67% already voted. I don't see a point in voting again. In any case though I do not approve of nameface as CEO at all -- he has no experience running an asset and has been caught lying about his holdings in BMF, and being a real pain in the ass about it too, constantly accusing me of being a scammer despite having solid proof from both myself and burnside that his story does not check out. So while he has rights as a shareholder I feel if you try to push him in (esp. after the above vote) there will be serious problems.

I also suggest that instead of holding a vote again you get this done on BitFunder; TradeFortress or you could draft a motion and ask Ukyo to post it. I've already asked Ukyo to post it but he was away. If you ask him now, he will probably post it.

Edit:
Not sure if you have got the message, but Ukto is unwilling to change the CEO of the security or things like that because it was not specified in the description / contract. This is from wisard:
[snip]

Well, then shareholder motions have very little meaning :p anyways I can't be as involved as I was earlier on, so you guys decide what to do. My vote is for tradefortress as before, and I'll throw in with whatever he decides from this point on.
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 101
Thanks for your thoughts usagi.

All shareholders have all the known information at this point.

One potential new shareholder has contacted me by email- Klaus Franke, claiming to hold 230. I've asked him for verification.

I've sent out the interim CEO/ spokesman ballot list to all shareholders, asking for any more suggestions, and I'm waiting for responses to that including yours. However if you wish, I can accept that with your last post you have agreed to the Ballot list and cast your vote for TradeFortress.

I think the correct way to proceed with this process is by communication, and voting proportionate to shares held.

Please be careful with what you post in public. We don't want to put anyone in a difficult legal situation.
vip
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
13
This morning has brought a major breakthrough!!  Smiley

All Bakewell shareholders known to us have been PM'd with the details.

So, this is great news indeed Smiley I vote to make the information public. Let people know what's going on. I vote we should keep a record of what we are doing and what Ian said he was going to do, so that no one "forgets" what's going on.

My thoughts are, within 3 days we need solid information from Ian one way or the other or we need to go to the police. Now that we have you-know-who on board it is time to show results, either Ian to do what he said he would do and make a post here as he promised Ukyo on Skype, or for us to get a police report and send it to you-know-who.

I also think it's very clear we've already elected TradeFortress as the new CEO in Ian's absence, do we need to re-vote on that? TradeFortress please forward the shareholder count from this thread (it's over 65% last I checked) voting you in as CEO to you-know-who and make the request formally.

Good job team ^^
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 101
This morning has brought a major breakthrough!!  Smiley

All Bakewell shareholders known to us have been PM'd with the details.

The updated shareholder list is:

usagi-  294
tulkos-  483
strello-   97
iCEBREAKER-  ??
fourd00rgtz-   300
MikeMark-   300
nameFace-   252
wisard-  1123
Evolvex-   111
Razcnah   730
scrybe-  966

If there are any shareholders left out there, now is the time to get in touch.

Please visit and link as widely as possible to:

scammer-ianbakewell.com
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
I just pulled the Bakewell Asset list into a Google Fusion Table.

Now it is preserved in another location.


Because bitfloor, I've changed my payout address.  Please update!  Thanks.
full member
Activity: 179
Merit: 100
Bitcoin: money chosen by the market.
I just pulled the Bakewell Asset list into a Google Fusion Table.

Now it is preserved in another location.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
At this point, the shareholder list will remain visible on the BitFunder asset list should someone want to copy and paste it.
There are no immediate plans to remove BAKEWELL the list, but might happen in the next few months.
I think it should stay public for a while so anyone else can get a copy for reference.

This is all I have to help with, wish it was more.

There's a quick something (two things in fact) you could do Ukyo that may help.

When lists of shareholders are imported to Bitfunder they don't show up in the public asset list unless/until the account-holder enters a BTC address.  Can you confirm whether or not the public list is actually complete?  If not, could you email those not on it to add a BTC address.

Second thng you could do is identify which BTC addresses in the list are Ian's.
Pages:
Jump to: