Topic: Ban Appeal For naim027. (SOLVED) - page 7. (Read 3906 times)

Well, If you say this. Then maybe I am wrong. I had some interactions with more people, but they pretended they didn't know I was banned or didn't care about me. I am glad that at least you have expressed your opinion about me. Still, I won't say I have too many friends and well-wishers here.

I won't give up until I heard something from officials. As I have said, A Single man cannot be good in everyone's eyes.

I am not going to expand much on what I already said but here I want to reaffirm that you lied because you said you had not made a good relationship with anyone. There are several people on the forum that I would have a beer with, and with you I would have had one before this happened.


I think you are right. It doesn't look good to me either.

Yes, You did - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58575673
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58574854


Sure, Here it is - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58574156

Because you supported his claims without further investigation. Later, Mr dkbit98 realized that Poker Player and I are not alts but you didn't change your statement.

Well, That's your personal business. But, If you want to make it correct, Left an appropriate comment there. Just, Participant of Known alts of anyone cannot be a good reason to trust someone.

Well, That's an additional reason. I didn't distrust you for only this one.

Just because they applied on a Paused campaign, they don't deserve a negative trust. Trust systems should be used for scam-related things.

---

That was an additional reason. That wasn't the only reason for distrusting him. Stop twisting my words everywhere.

---

I know that you have the right to suspect anyone and I don't have any problem with that since you have understand everything back then and removed the feedback.
Yes, I did plagiarism in my newbie days but I don't think you have ignored me because you knew that I have broken forum rules. You have ignored me because I argued against your allegations or something. If not, Could you please explain what forum rules I have broken back then? For what reason exactly I was on your ignore list? If you knew that I was breaking forum rules, Why don't you report me instead of putting me on your ignore list?

Yes, This topic is about my Ban appeal. If Timelord doesn't ask me a question about that, I wouldn't say a single word about you.

I have the right to suspect in anyone if I think there is something shady about certain members, and I was not so much wrong because you made copy-paste plagiarism multiple times with one of your altaccounts.
This topic is for your ban appeal not about me, and I have to say that your case is not looking good so far, honestly I have to say that you were part of my ignore list long before you got banned for breaking forum rules.

Once again, duplicity. He himself added me to his trust list. But I'm also looking for cheaters.

Oh my God, naim027, you are not friends with logic at all, are you?

Your phrase about trust is just an antilogism.


How do you rate JollyGood on your list? In any case, he is also quite severe concerning cheaters.

All the rest you added, I don't need to explain it to me... knowing your face.

Tilda on suchmoon made me laugh endlessly. I think you made him very upset.

Your distrust of me is fair. I cannot become your friend because I wouldn't say I like flattery.

And yet, it is very pleasing that you have learned the rules and can now teach everyone how to create your trust lists. But one little tip: buy a mirror, look at yourself, and then teach others.

Thanks you for your response - let's work through these accusations as best we can.


Did I support dkbit98's claims?  Please provide a link to that post, please.


Interesting.  Can you supply that link of where you allege I make this claim, please?


How is that connected to me?


Please provide links and or proof to back up that assertion so that I can make corrections as need be.



True.  


Are you saying that is not the correct use of the trust feedback that I say I trust them enough that I would do a trade?

More over, why single just me out?  Why not any other person (and there are many) who make identical or very similar positive trust feedback posts on other users trust feedback pages?  Why single out just me?


I have given out 2,000+ negative trust feedbacks, can you quote the relevant one for me to review, please?


I very well may have done so.  Again, I wouldn't be the only one, so the question is again two fold:  Can you please provide a link to who/where this occurred, please?  And, again, do you consider this is not the correct use of the trust feedback system?

I know how the trust system work. Where did I say I want to make it centralized? I know it's their own business. I already know the reason so I don't have to ask anyone what was the reason.

---

Well, That was a long story Timelord. Seems you forgot everything. Once dkbit98 accused me and Poker Player as alts without any evidence and connections. You as a DT1, are Supposed to be investigated further before supporting his claims. You also claimed that my account had a connection with another random guy based on the Bitcoin address I copied from previous signature participants without verifying further. Later, Mr dkbit98 removed the neutral tag from my account after Poker Player submitted some proof of his claims.

Moreover, I saw you have left some feedback which is not correct in my opinion.

For example, You have left positive feedback to Scam busters. (Do you believe scam busters are unlike scam someone?), You left negative feedback just because someone applied on a paused campaign (That's cannot be a reason to be tagged). You have left negative feedback on some Ban evasion account (That's useless, Report to Mods via a thread instead)

This post:  ?? ?? ??


Not exactly "proof" is it?

---

---

Hello naim027, can you give me a break down as to why you Default Trust Distrust me, please?

---

---

Your trust list this last week is interesting:


Thanks.

That's how the trust system in this forum work and anyone are freely to trust or distrust someone. You wanted to control the trust system and make it centralized? lol

Also it's their own business, you don't have any right to know the reason.

Thanks for wishing me luck.

A single person cannot be good in everyone's eyes.
Someone Said, "You don't have to convince everyone, just a Mod".

---

Just Because you have left your personal opinion about my recent activity and wished me luck, You are no longer trusted by someone,

10. Removed The Pharmacist (Trust: +28 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (29) 4177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

The same thing was happened with LoyceV just because of this -

For this post, He was no longer trusted by someone-

9. Removed LoyceV (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (58) 9526 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Later, She said she was overreacted and apologized:


Do think sometimes she takes everything personally?

Your this username Dic3L0v3r

Only "desi" can read it

Anyway good luck with getting your back account, don't lose hope.

I didn't repeat Plagiarism after getting warned by psycodad and LoyceV. You check all my posts after 19th November 2021.

---

Actually, It's not three years. I made my return to this forum in October 2021. Also, I never plagiarized after 19th November 2021. To be honest, I thought I have edited all. I forgot if that was plagiarized or not. I didn't know about free plagiarism tools back then. But, I have found some tools later. But, The bullshit thing is, I didn't check my old post with the tool after I found some online tools.


Thanks for your support. But, Some members think those are useless merit fishing stats. Let's See if I get a chance.

---

Well, Could you please explain which pattern are you referring to? I got it from here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/stherapist-mdayonliner-5096681

I am sorry, I have seen Dtalk, Little Mouse and RaptarX in this forum. But, I am not aware of others.

Ever since mdayonliner's drama I've been wondering: what are the odds of so many Bangladesh locals following a similar pattern? But that's not enough to link accounts.

I'm not exactly sure what your post means, but damn....I don't remember lovesmayfamilis being banned at all.  I had to check all the pages of that thread to see if I posted in it.  

I just based what I said about naim027 on the interactions we had regarding these fake USB sticks that are advertised as being able to mine XMR.  It's a long story, and I'm not arguing that he didn't lie or anything of the sort.  The more I read in this thread, the more I feel I have to remind myself more often to be wary of dealing with people here.  

Also, I agree that it isn't cool to send merits to alt accounts, so there's that.

Yep, that's the litmus test for how devoted one is to bitcointalk.  Speaking of that, how many members have gotten a signature ban instead of a permanent one?  Anyone know?

Seriously?

O my dear... another one Gone with the Wind... I did not notice you are gone.

I had some interaction with you in our local thread and in WO too and I admit that your posts there are always very construction and informative and really appreciate your work you did in our local thread while calculating stats.

You are not alone in this situation, well mostly its new comers who fall in this situation but you are not junior member any more, along with you another member NoorulHuda is in similar situation... we should remember with higher positions, comes more responsibility.



I guess below is your WO post you are talking about and LoyceV  was the one who remined you about this... and yes it was in November 2021 and and look at the words of LoyceV (he's not a bot... he's God.... please tell us when BTC will be $100k?)



Based on your above comments "No one even suggested me anything" I think you deserve a chance. It's true on internet many user take the pilgrims very lightly unless get trapped in it.

---

oops when did this happen??? hahahaha... will give it a read... interesting.

---

F*** kill me... so there's no comma in it? only "=" signs?

I know very well that you have not been banned before, and when I say that you had a second chance then I mean that you were warned to correct your mistakes, and from 2019 until today you have not done that. It sounds incredible to me that you failed to review a few dozen (and even a few hundred posts) in about 3 years...

In case you get a temporary or signature ban, my advice to you is to start reviewing your post history today - because it would be really tragicomic for someone to find you a plagiarized post after all this.

I don't understand why would you do repeated plagiarism and pretending like you don't know the rules about that, when there are several topics and new posts with reported members every day.
I have a hard time trusting anything Naim027 is saying, however, everyone can make a mistake or two in early days, even Lauda got tagged for the same thing, so I would consider changing this to temp-ban or signature ban.
I think we are going to see how useful you are really for forum when you don't have any signature to wear.

PS
Sending merits to you alt account is not cool, and I consider it cheating.

Another ALT of yours got nuked. Such sad, much WoW. Have you been able to penetrate DT yet?

Those, who are wondering, may like to check my previous post in a locked thread- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5293217

So, the list is now...

mdayonliner = S_Therapist = Little Mouse = DTalk = bitcoinbangladesh.org = RapTarX = naim027 = Dic3L0v3r

Well, I am not sure how it's cheating since after he reported my first post, I told her, "Yes, it was plagiarized, and I just edited the post and added the source link". Is it cheating?
Which kind of behavior are you referring to? I already know which post caused me to be banned. Yes, That was a plagiarized post, and I was unable to edit this post because I forgot if it was plagiarized or not.

You should look at the message history of someone who accuses you of plagiarism.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60171857

With due diligence, you would probably see another very interesting post, where Solosanz simply did not give you a chance to "hide your head in the sand", that is, escape from the scene of the crime and again, as if nothing had happened, add a link. Naturally, the plagiarism messages were removed by the moderators, as they always do after a copy is discovered.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5822/58224716.html

Now check how much you're cheating here. And are you really respecting the forum by showing this kind of behavior?