Pages:
Author

Topic: Ban Appeal RegulusHr and discussion on topic "good for the forum as a whole". - page 4. (Read 6318 times)

legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
North Korea has fairer politics than Bitcointalk.
Hm....In addition to previous my post, I have found another observable instance:

Looks like double standards https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/appeal-of-ban-appeal-hacker1001101001-spammer-sockpuppet-menagerie-5240612

(edited quote):

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me.


Was RegulusHr behind ICO bump service and/or he sockpuppeted their way into DT? Why he can't get second chance like all other ban evaders and ICO fraudulent service account?


Why is this account banned and all these accounts got second chance? Or, better, why all these accounts are not banned and regulushr is?
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
A lot of time has passed, it would be nice if the Administration could reconsider this case one more time and give back to the Croatian community one of its all-time favorite members. Even if RegulusHr had received a 1 year signature ban, that one would have expired by now as well.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
I was curious why RegulusHR was permabaned without getting second chance like many other users here, I suspected there is something larger going on but no one really told us anything. Now, we have this spam account who got second chance and I find all this very confusing.

I have stated my thoughts on this thread several times during the discussion, and like most of the Croatian community, it was not clear to me why some members got a second chance at much worse plagiarism cases, while others like RegulusHr did not get anything other than complete ignore. Especially considering that this member has received the biggest support from his community than any other member who has start a ban appeal.

The only thing in my opinion that is led to this development is the fact that RegulusHR is become a merit source just a day before he got ban, and admin is notice that for sure. RegulusHR should definitely be given a second chance, nothing more or less than what others have been given.

No, Regulus was a merit source long before that.
In fact, theymos only a day or two before permaban doubled the number of available merits for Regulus as merit source.
Perhaps this is why the permaban, which happened after the "big reward from admin", was without the possibility of forgiveness or second chance for him.
I'm just guessing because in 8 months of this discussion we've never received any response from admin but Regulus seems to have made them very angry.
It's just my opinion, of course.
If I'm wrong I'd like to ask theymos to correct me and to say openly the right reasons for refusing forgiveness.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1571
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
The only thing in my opinion that is led to this development is the fact that RegulusHR is become a merit source just a day before he got ban, and admin is notice that for sure. RegulusHR should definitely be given a second chance, nothing more or less than what others have been given.

Nope, he was a merit source for a while before the ban. We just did not know about it because he did not tell anybody he was.
He admitted it when somebody asked him and that was a few days before the ban so you probably connected these 2 things.

I've said my piece about this topic so I won't be dragged back into it again. North Korea has fairer politics than Bitcointalk.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
I was curious why RegulusHR was permabaned without getting second chance like many other users here, I suspected there is something larger going on but no one really told us anything. Now, we have this spam account who got second chance and I find all this very confusing.

I have stated my thoughts on this thread several times during the discussion, and like most of the Croatian community, it was not clear to me why some members got a second chance at much worse plagiarism cases, while others like RegulusHr did not get anything other than complete ignore. Especially considering that this member has received the biggest support from his community than any other member who has start a ban appeal.

The only thing in my opinion that is led to this development is the fact that RegulusHR is become a merit source just a day before he got ban, and admin is notice that for sure. RegulusHR should definitely be given a second chance, nothing more or less than what others have been given.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
Good case finding. If I remember correctly I was arguing against this here, and this user is definitely much more contributing than the one linked in the topic.
I was curious why RegulusHR was permabaned without getting second chance like many other users here, I suspected there is something larger going on but no one really told us anything. Now, we have this spam account who got second chance and I find all this very confusing.

There were 2 c/p posts found in RegulusHR's history as far as I remember, and as for hacker, there was one c/p post:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51058321 (this is c/p from one of accounts I mentioned in this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54171090) and, of course, there is more c/p posts in hacker's post history(archived):

Quote
This makes bitcoin a dark currency and a currency which only bad and evil minded people uses. Bitcoin is like a big opportunity for many people in the world if used in correct way. Buying drugs with bitcoin is not a good option. Some of the sites on deep web like silk road are shutdown due to this bad use of bitcoin and people should also not try to do so.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/buying-drugs-with-bitcoin-1184641
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/buying-drugs-with-bitcoin-1184641
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/should-i-buy-bitcoin-now-2316855

This makes score 2:2 Huh

edited links
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Good case finding. If I remember correctly I was arguing against this here, and this user is definitely much more contributing than the one linked in the topic.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
It seems to me that the moderators and admins do not want to explain the reason for this permaban, after more than 8 months, and rather wait for the topic to die naturally.
I personally know that RegulusHr also did not receive any response to private messages he sent to admins what makes me sad.
In any case, I want to thank 27 users who voted in support of RegulusHr and to everyone who participated in the discussion and expressed their views on the case, positive or negative.
Too bad your opinion doesn't matter.
hero member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 583
xUSD - The PRIVATE stable coin - Haven Protocol
if we take a look at the ✅[BAN APPEAL] ... list ... we can see that there are only 3 users waiting longer than RegulusHr
I think that all of them deserve an answer, positive or negative

From my point of view, I still hope that RegulusHr will be marked as Unbanned asap

Best regards
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
I think it is time to finally end this saga in one way or the other. It has been going on for way too long. I don't think there is any other ban appeal thread like this one. If you are not planning to forgive his mistakes at least tell the lad that he is not coming back.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
@great leader and global moderators, as I am very curious person and forum is source of information, meta is discussion about forum and ban thingies are related to discussion about forum (to be more precise, about forum rules), I am really curious what is the main reason why regulus didn't get second chance?

Is it:

a) 2 c/p posts
b) more than 2 c/p posts
c) c/p posts + something else

Looking forward to Your answer!
sr. member
Activity: 1491
Merit: 320
🐪
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
Ok, it's time to bring this topic to the top, given that nothing has been resolved yet after more than 8 months.
It seems to me that mods and admins don't feel comfortable to discuss about this case in public, in front of everyone.
I don't know why but I, and many others, will continue to ask admins and mods to review this case.
In following post I shared my suggestion how to deal with permaban appeal cases, in more transparent way:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/theymos-suggestion-for-permaban-5178987
I hope admins and mods will respond eventually and review this case based on the big public interest about this case.



full member
Activity: 588
Merit: 103
We don't need more votes. All we need is one admin who can unban RegulusHr Smiley
We invested a lot of time in this case and we would not do that if he didn't deserve it. 
sr. member
Activity: 1491
Merit: 320
🐪


I'm member in Croatian forum and I an say that RegulusHr is well respected member in our local forum.
He was first merit source and really helped many local members to get merit for good quality posts in croatian and to advance in the forum.
He even organize first offline meeting between members in Croatia.
We really enjoyed great time in the restaurant for the dinner and sharing and he paid for it.
He is very kind member, always ready to help and support others.
We really miss him a lot and want him back!
Since he was main merit sourcer in our part of the forum, we lost also in this way.
Yes, he made one mistake but is anybody perfect here, without any mistake?
Please mods forgive his mistake and restore his account.
In the coming posts you will see great support he have among croatian members on this forum.

Bump to allow more people to vote on this issue.
sr. member
Activity: 1491
Merit: 320
🐪
Almost 85% voters think than permaban should be removed. It would be interesting to find out why our request is ignored for moths.

Yes, it is so weird that no one from the staff said something about this ban...

With this post I am encouraging more users to vote Smiley

Please refer to this post to see why we are asking for permaban removal.
full member
Activity: 588
Merit: 103
Almost 85% voters think than permaban should be removed. It would be interesting to find out why our request is ignored for moths.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
Current result:
Total Voters: 25
yes 21 (84%)
no 4 (16%)

Thank you to everyone who has already voted.
I ask others, who have not yet, to vote.

 
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
Current result:
Total Voters: 23
yes 20 (87%)
no 3 (13%)

I thank everyone who voted and expressed their opinion until now.
I would also like to ask other users to vote and give their opinion about this case.
Pages:
Jump to: