Pages:
Author

Topic: Ban Legendaries from signature campaigns - page 3. (Read 2744 times)

legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
Yeah hi, wake the fuck up.  It's not pennies we're talking about once you reach hero status.   It definitely adds up, and if you're going to be posting here anyway--why not?  What you're basically saying is that legendaries shouldn't have a need for extra income.  That makes no sense to me and I think you're just trolling.   
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I often post one liners or one sentence responses.  For this reason, I'm not in a signature campaign.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
If you are still scrabbling around for pennies after ~2 years, shitposting, misinforming, counting posts like a noob

you have done nothing of significance for bitcoin

That is a new thought. I would say all users who are shitposting/misinforming should be banned from the forum.
You shouldn't be painting all Legendary users with the same brush.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
Not everyone cares about money or hoarding coins etc.. like me.
Which is why i would never be in a SIG campaign.

I get the OP's point though..

Myself i dumped all i had back when BTC was a grand in late 2013'ish..
And unlike most idiots i never invested a cent.
Took me forever just to get 1 LTC coin.
I did it by scraping up dust and trading up etc.

So if i guy like me wanted to start like that over again why not ?

If a Legendary account is in a SIG campaign they are probably just trying to advertise because they are associated with the product i bet.
But i also think some may be in on it because they need the dust they get from them.
So if they are poor and need it then hey what is the problem ?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1179
And what is with your logic?
If someone has been here 3 years there is an expectation that they should have already collected a minimum amount of Bitcoin?
That is stupid.  Roll Eyes
Well, to a certain extent it does make sense. It's fairly easy to assume that when you're a sub 2013 legendary member, by now you should have been in a very comfortable position, financially speaking.

If you're not, then you have been sleeping and dreaming, but not doing anything of significance, again, financially speaking. It's the hard reality.

But the thing is that a fair number of legendary members don't really represent their original account creators anymore. In other words, these accounts are either bought, or hacked.
sr. member
Activity: 646
Merit: 252
PNNV.COM Live bitcoin price monitor
If you are still scrabbling around for pennies after ~2 years, shitposting, misinforming, counting posts like a noob

you have done nothing of significance for bitcoin

Somehow I agree. I think you have some point. But I also think they are not primarily here to gather pennies. They are earning decent amount already for sure but they are just staying to promote a new project. However, it is also sad that some are taking advantage of their very high ranks to gain some more regardless of their reputation as legendaries.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
I think signatures should be used for political or personal comments, or to promote services we use and know are good and reliable, or to promote our own sites or products. Signatures are too valuable to waste on campaigns for products we wouldn't touch with a cyberpole.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
On the contrary anyone who signs up for one is the loser.
And no i never have.
When I got here they did not exist yet..

And what is with your logic?
If someone has been here 3 years there is an expectation that they should have already collected a minimum amount of Bitcoin?
That is stupid.  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
If you are still scrabbling around for pennies after ~2 years, shitposting, misinforming, counting posts like a noob

you have done nothing of significance for bitcoin
Pages:
Jump to: