Topic: Banning Male Urinals (Read 4619 times)

EVIL FEMINISTS

As a male here, I prefer urinals because of its convenience in using and touch is not needed with the urinal.

That will be an act of oppressing yourself...

I still think that the world is getting too boring, you can't to anything without opressing someone, one day, im gonna kill myself

Blame nature, it'll be glad to hear you

I wonder if the various new-age shit problems (and others) have something to do with GMOs?

My last place of work had these really cool Japanese toilets with butt squirters.  The fancy ones even had dryers, perfume sprayers, and everything else the fertile if weird Japanese mind could come up with.  I always planned to get one of those things before I die.  I'd probably make my money back on toilet paper since I don't wipe without about three loops around my hand and I keep wiping until there is no more shit-stain at all.  Often I'll just jump in the shower real quick if I can't get the shit-stain gone after using a whole roll of toilet paper.  And I don't buy that cheap stuff either.

It is bad enough that you have to pay in Europe to use a bathroom.   Equality is only good if it improves the lot of some group.   It is not an improvement when the better off group has things taken away.   Here if the urinals give way to toilets and since toilets each get their own stall while urinals use less space than stalls then there will be less units to pee in.   Then we will see long lines outside of men's bathrooms.  Too bad.

sdp

I'm getting old now so my bladder must be playing tricks on me as there's always a final spurt straight into my thong so I have to hang around for a while banging my toilet area against the wall to get it all out.

I've really gone off having dumps as well these days. Every single one is a one million wiper no matter what I do.

I think we need a toilet rethink. Maybe a hermetically sealed bubble where anything goes that's guaranteed to spit you out gleaming all over.

I prefer urinals.  I can hold my dick up so it doesn't touch the urinal cake, but when sitting on the toilet it hangs down into the water and there is not much I can do about it.

Seriously, the only time I've gotten any significant quantity of piss on the floor or on my pant leg is when sitting down and pissing while I was also taking a dump.  Piss doesn't come straight out of my cock but rather at somewhat of an upward angle which can, depending on various configurations, make it's way between the bowl rim an the toilet seat.  I'm pretty sure I'm being discriminated against and victimized by toilet makers and, by extension, society at large.

Exactly: you decide for yourself what is more comfortable for you.


 

I am male and I do not support urinals. Not because of ideology, I just tend to dribble and piss all over myself so I'd rather do that in private.

I'll put it more succinctly:  Yes, in a lot of cases the programming is distinctly 'Marxist', but that is not the end goal of the programmers.

Ironically, the programmers find Marxism even more distasteful than Capitalism but it is a useful phase and stepping stone.  The so-called 'social justice warriors' would do well to reflect on the anticipated fate of 'Marxists' when the Stalinists got done using them as tools.  (Technocrats are not Stalinists, but some principles are universal.)

To those true 'social justice warriors' (as opposed to simple trolls), you are probably in more danger than most in the coming phase.  There are universal reasons that transcend various political labels, and Bezmenov simply communicated it on one instance.  Note that the editing is not great in this little 10 minute vid about who was being neutralized and not clear initially when the subject is first mentioned:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Iz3VjoHXLA

You wanna talk about dirty, visit any women's restroom anywhere. I think you should have to piss standing on your head because I don't like how much of a mess you make of your restrooms.

I think that this should be done the places around are really not tidy and looks so dirty due to smell all around the place that affects everyone passing through. There are some malls all around available for comfort rooms that can be use by anyone..

Do some research on "critical theory" and "The Frankfurt School", and tell me again this shared "source code" for insane liberals is not based on Marxism. I am not sure what the relation of the rest of your statement with this point is. It seems as if you are diverging off into another topic.

I don't believe so.

Marx had a progression which was ordered ... ---> capitalism ---> communism.  Brzezinski took it a step farther ... ---> capitalism ---> communism --> technocracy.  Technocracy is envisioned to have corporations basically own everything and employ technocrats who manage society.

I think that what we have here is a situation where collectivism in various forms (including Marxism) is promoted heavily.  Taught in schools, sold to various narrow interest groups such as feminist and eco-freaks as a way to achieve their goals, sold to power hungry as a way to focus their control, sold to money hungry as a way to get assets for pennies on the dollar, etc.  All of this is mostly just a stepping stone however.

I see things as a 'scissors, rock, paper' type deal:

 - Capitalism trumps Technocracy because the latter is simple slavery which will certainly degrade into something awful within a short time (and it being birthed corrupt from the get-go in fact.)

 - Communism trumps Capitalism when the distribution of wealth gets to high, and it also has the power to collectivize resources (land, minerals, etc) allowing them to be handed over to oligarchs without much fuss.

 - Technocracy trump Communism since it is more efficient and sounds good compared to the awful track record of Communism every time it has been attempted.  Technocracy is only very practical with technolgies which are only recently mature.

Anyway, I think that at the upper levels of the Globalists they see this very clearly.  They already own most of the corporations who are going to ease into place.  And the plebs are getting antsy as evidenced by such events as the occupy movement, Trump/Sanders, the troubles in EU-land, etc.  As time goes by more and more people see the regionalization, the TPP-like trade deals (run by the U.N. which is the center mass for the 'new world order' Technocracy project, and their eyes begin to open up.  The 'sweet spot' for implementation is probably very near at hand.

Urinal Hand Washing Fail
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-OYM7AhW7Q

That source code is called Marxism.

I theorize that if you decompile the binary (or a lot of the shared object libraries) of a feminist (or eco-freak or any number of other mostly left-wing crazies) you will find source code writen by globalist with a longer term agenda.  Most often it is competely undetected by the bot-like individual themselves even at fairly high levels in their organizations.

In this case what is probably happening is about survailance or 'total information awareness' and bathrooms are still kinda taboo for invasive monitoring.  I'll bet it drives the control freaks crazy.  About a day after the unisex bathroom is ready some pervy wanker will jump on the oportunity to get his rocks off.  The solution to that problem will be survailence cams and half the population or more will be begging for them.

The whole point of this debate began with the European feminazi push to feminize all men and force them to sit to pee like their penis envied lesbian sisters. Furthermore it is also about punishing men for being born with a penis. This rule effectively would force men to endure much longer lines in bathrooms just like the women have to for lack of a member. This has critical theory written all over it.