Topic: [BBR] Boolberry GPU Miner Discussion - AMD & Nvidia - OpenCL & CUDA - page 20. (Read 82997 times)
August 01, 2014, 04:23:20 AM
AMD drivers 13.12 ? HD7950 cards
August 01, 2014, 04:16:50 AM
Code:
**********************************************************************
2014-Aug-01 12:13:21.954973 [P2P9][173.236.43.58:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 12:13:21.970599 [P2P4]Connecting to 218.56.59.145:10101(white=1, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m0.s37)...
2014-Aug-01 12:13:22.126856 [P2P1][62.201.213.25:10101 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-Aug-01 12:13:24.080085 [P2P0][218.56.59.145:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 12:13:24.080085 [P2P4]Connecting to 121.244.64.83:10101(white=1, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m0.s40)...
2014-Aug-01 12:13:25.033260 [P2P6][121.244.64.83:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 12:13:25.033260 [P2P4]Connecting to 115.22.227.98:10101(white=0, las
t_seen: d0.h1.m2.s28)...
2014-Aug-01 12:13:27.267753 [P2P4]Connect failed to 115.22.227.98:10101
2014-Aug-01 12:13:27.267753 [P2P4]Connecting to 107.170.228.11:10101(white=0, la
st_seen: d0.h0.m0.s11)...
2014-Aug-01 12:13:27.845908 [P2P3][107.170.228.11:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE I
NVOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 12:13:27.845908 [P2P4]Connecting to 81.31.38.5:10101(white=0, last_s
een: d0.h0.m0.s11)...
2014-Aug-01 12:13:28.064670 [P2P7][81.31.38.5:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE INVOK
ED OK
2014-Aug-01 12:13:28.064670 [P2P4]Connecting to 188.230.136.52:10101(white=0, la
st_seen: d0.h0.m0.s12)...
2014-Aug-01 12:13:28.236554 [P2P5][188.230.136.52:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE I
NVOKED OK
August 01, 2014, 04:10:28 AM
But
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.777962 [P2P1][180.97.28.56:10101 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.777962 [P2P4][144.76.29.150:10101 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
and in appdata/rouming/boolb i have blockchain.bin 156mb
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.777962 [P2P1][180.97.28.56:10101 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.777962 [P2P4][144.76.29.150:10101 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
and in appdata/rouming/boolb i have blockchain.bin 156mb
July 29, 2014, 01:29:49 PM
Scratch that, it works!
710kh/s on a single 750Ti at stock clocks so far - saw 716 poolside!
NSFW
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbrcudaminer.png
710kh/s on a single 750Ti at stock clocks so far - saw 716 poolside!
NSFW
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbrcudaminer.png
foxy! and I mean the numbers...
lol, yeah; 710kh/s is quite the improvement
Topped it! (nsfw as always): https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbrcudaminer2.png
790kh/s, 750Ti @ stock clocks
August 01, 2014, 03:46:00 AM
Code:
D:\boolberry-opencl-0.2.0.31c-windows-x64>boolbd.exe start-mining=1BNBP6rJotCTeG
jjdZkyQGQB5p2ki4mKUKEUPgj8fiNyAytRiEzo2KHdFrw9ENwtYrPrmnWi8UEJYeigVsGdK3c81CQuqd
g --mining-threads=3
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.746234 Starting...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.746234 Boolberry v0.2.0.31()
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.746234 Module folder: boolbd.exe
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.746234 Initializing p2p server...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.761862 Binding on 0.0.0.0:10101
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.761862 Net service binded on 0.0.0.0:10101
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.761862 P2p server initialized OK on port: 10101
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.761862 Starting UPnP
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.761862 Initializing currency protocol...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.761862 Currency protocol initialized OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.761862 Initializing core rpc server...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.777486 Binding on 127.0.0.1:10102
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.777486 Core rpc server initialized OK on port: 10102
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.777486 Initializing core...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:01.777486 Loading blockchain...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.793218 Blockchain initialized. last block: 53936, d0.h0.m4.
s23 time ago, current difficulty: 195676273172
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.808843 Donating 2% to the OpenCL miner developer. Thanks fo
r your support.
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.808843 You can change or disable your donation in miner_con
f.json, edit "donation_percent_opencl" key.
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.808843 Core initialized OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.808843 Starting core rpc server...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.824470 Run net_service loop( 2 threads)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.840095 [SRV_MAIN]Core rpc server started ok
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.840095 [SRV_MAIN]Starting p2p net loop...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:03.840095 [SRV_MAIN]Run net_service loop( 10 threads)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:04.840151 [P2P3]
**********************************************************************
The daemon will start synchronizing with the network. It may take up to several
hours.
You can set the level of process detailization by using command "set_log
", whereis either 0 (no details), 1 (current block height synchronized)
, or 2 (all details).
Use "help" command to see the list of available commands.
Note: in case you need to interrupt the process, use "exit" command. Otherwise,
the current progress won't be saved.
**********************************************************************
2014-Aug-01 11:36:04.840151 [P2P0]Connecting to 180.97.28.56:10101(white=1, last
_seen: d0.h0.m0.s52)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:09.168505 [P2P9][180.97.28.56:10101 OUT]Sync data returned unk
nown top block: 53937 -> 53938 [1 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Aug-01 11:36:09.168505 [P2P9][180.97.28.56:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE INV
OKED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:09.184128 [P2P0]Connecting to 121.244.64.83:10101(white=1, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m1.s1)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.152932 [P2P1][121.244.64.83:10101 OUT]Sync data returned un
known top block: 53937 -> 53938 [1 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.152932 [P2P1][121.244.64.83:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.152932 [P2P0]Connecting to 144.76.29.150:10101(white=1, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m1.s3)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.277939 [P2P9][144.76.29.150:10101 OUT]Sync data returned un
known top block: 53937 -> 53938 [1 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.277939 [P2P9][144.76.29.150:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.293562 [P2P0]Connecting to 200.35.56.155:10101(white=1, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m1.s2)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.777962 [P2P1][180.97.28.56:10101 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.777962 [P2P4][144.76.29.150:10101 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:10.777962 [P2P1]
**********************************************************************
You are now synchronized with the network. You may now start simplewallet.
Please note, that the blockchain will be saved only after you quit the daemon wi
th "exit" command or if you use "save" command.
Otherwise, you will possibly need to synchronize the blockchain again.
Use "help" command to see the list of available commands.
**********************************************************************
2014-Aug-01 11:36:11.012352 [P2P5][121.244.64.83:10101 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:11.871773 [P2P7][200.35.56.155:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:11.871773 [P2P0]Connecting to 59.120.166.41:10101(white=1, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m1.s2)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:13.621865 [P2P1][59.120.166.41:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:13.621865 [P2P0]Connecting to 162.210.192.66:7190(white=0, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m0.s5)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:13.996885 [P2P2][162.210.192.66:7190 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:13.996885 [P2P0]Connecting to 2.179.176.194:10101(white=0, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m0.s37)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:15.075067 [P2P2][2.179.176.194:10101 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
2014-Aug-01 11:36:15.075067 [P2P0]Connecting to 162.210.192.66:7180(white=0, las
t_seen: d0.h0.m0.s11)...
2014-Aug-01 11:36:15.450092 [P2P9][162.210.192.66:7180 OUT] COMMAND_HANDSHAKE IN
VOKED OK
win8.1 x64
August 01, 2014, 03:10:11 AM
lol, since I did more than 3x with the XMR cpuminer, I don't think anyone doubts it 
...it was just another try to get a performance update.
next time i'll wear my sexy fox suit!
August 01, 2014, 02:31:18 AM
Stabilized hashrate, slightly lower, but still in 780 - 790kh/s range for one 750Ti @ stock; stratum, although it had that since its inception, and now shows name of GPU: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbrcudaminer3.png
photoshoped numbers for sure!
but i could verify your code performance on my rig's - for free
http://www.clipartreview.com/_images_300/A_smiling_red_fox_110427-224807-962009.jpg
July 29, 2014, 07:24:23 AM
Scratch that, it works!
710kh/s on a single 750Ti at stock clocks so far - saw 716 poolside!
NSFW
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbrcudaminer.png
710kh/s on a single 750Ti at stock clocks so far - saw 716 poolside!
NSFW
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbrcudaminer.png
foxy! and I mean the numbers...
lol, yeah; 710kh/s is quite the improvement
August 01, 2014, 12:18:11 AM
hello mbk.I have mine your miner two days. The boolbd is very well,but the simplminer is not. Now ,I have three questions:
1. How can I know the speed of boolbd, the detail is :
hr: 3314044, efficiency: 101% (shares 2077/2082, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314071, efficiency: 101% (shares 2077/2082, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314023, efficiency: 100% (shares 2077/2082, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314075, efficiency: 100% (shares 2077/2082, blocks 1/1)
2014-Aug-01 13:04:09.972293 [miner 1]Share found 433866579, <828f8eb46a106a8c8ba
656541002ae898733cca64206e0aeee56fef479000000>
hr: 3314077, efficiency: 100% (shares 2078/2083, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314053, efficiency: 100% (shares 2078/2083, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314075, efficiency: 100% (shares 2078/2083, blocks 1/1)
2.simplminer in bbr.farm:1111. I have 5 kards,2 kards connected,3 kards cannot connected .Can you solve it ?the detail is:
2014-Aug-01 12:57:42.682920 Connecting bbr.farm:1111....
2014-Aug-01 12:57:42.882975 Connected bbr.farm:1111 OK
2014-Aug-01 12:57:43.108023 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Aug-01 13:00:56.656923 Failed to invoke http request to /json_rpc
2014-Aug-01 13:00:56.666911 Failed to get scratchpad. Disconnecting and retryin
g...
2014-Aug-01 13:00:56.676920 Connecting bbr.farm:1111....
2014-Aug-01 13:00:56.881973 Connected bbr.farm:1111 OK
2014-Aug-01 13:00:57.137022 Getting scratchpad...
3.Too many data were downloaded.The bandwith of network were 1m/s before connect, It's difficulty for me .Can you decrease it?
1. How can I know the speed of boolbd, the detail is :
hr: 3314044, efficiency: 101% (shares 2077/2082, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314071, efficiency: 101% (shares 2077/2082, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314023, efficiency: 100% (shares 2077/2082, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314075, efficiency: 100% (shares 2077/2082, blocks 1/1)
2014-Aug-01 13:04:09.972293 [miner 1]Share found 433866579, <828f8eb46a106a8c8ba
656541002ae898733cca64206e0aeee56fef479000000>
hr: 3314077, efficiency: 100% (shares 2078/2083, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314053, efficiency: 100% (shares 2078/2083, blocks 1/1)
hr: 3314075, efficiency: 100% (shares 2078/2083, blocks 1/1)
2.simplminer in bbr.farm:1111. I have 5 kards,2 kards connected,3 kards cannot connected .Can you solve it ?the detail is:
2014-Aug-01 12:57:42.682920 Connecting bbr.farm:1111....
2014-Aug-01 12:57:42.882975 Connected bbr.farm:1111 OK
2014-Aug-01 12:57:43.108023 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Aug-01 13:00:56.656923 Failed to invoke http request to /json_rpc
2014-Aug-01 13:00:56.666911 Failed to get scratchpad. Disconnecting and retryin
g...
2014-Aug-01 13:00:56.676920 Connecting bbr.farm:1111....
2014-Aug-01 13:00:56.881973 Connected bbr.farm:1111 OK
2014-Aug-01 13:00:57.137022 Getting scratchpad...
3.Too many data were downloaded.The bandwith of network were 1m/s before connect, It's difficulty for me .Can you decrease it?
July 31, 2014, 08:39:12 AM
Put debug messages i suggested in https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8033567 and check the output. Looks like it has trouble locating libOpenCL.so. In AMD SDK it's a link to libOpenCL.so.1. Both files should be in $AMDAPPSDKROOT/lib/x86_64.
I've been trying to get this to compile for awhile but I'm not having much luck. I have already read all the posts in this thread and tried all of the previous suggestions given to others. Any ideas?
Code:
-- OpenCL: Searching for AMD APP SDK
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_0
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_0 - found
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_1
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_1 - found
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_2
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_2 - found
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_3
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_3 - not found
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:108 (message):
Could NOT find OpenCL (missing: OPENCL_LIBRARY) (found version "1.2")
Call Stack (most recent call first):
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:315 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
FindOpenCL.cmake:167 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS)
CMakeLists.txt:13 (find_package)
July 29, 2014, 12:50:07 AM
This BBR CUDA miner I'm working on is giving me a headache. Works, more or less, but invalid shares.
Scratch that, it works!
710kh/s on a single 750Ti at stock clocks so far - saw 716 poolside!
NSFW
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbrcudaminer.png
July 30, 2014, 01:57:16 PM
I've been trying to get this to compile for awhile but I'm not having much luck. I have already read all the posts in this thread and tried all of the previous suggestions given to others. Any ideas?
Code:
-- OpenCL: Searching for AMD APP SDK
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_0
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_0 - found
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_1
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_1 - found
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_2
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_2 - found
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_3
-- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_3 - not found
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:108 (message):
Could NOT find OpenCL (missing: OPENCL_LIBRARY) (found version "1.2")
Call Stack (most recent call first):
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:315 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
FindOpenCL.cmake:167 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS)
CMakeLists.txt:13 (find_package)
July 28, 2014, 11:08:31 PM
This BBR CUDA miner I'm working on is giving me a headache. Works, more or less, but invalid shares.
July 30, 2014, 01:45:58 PM
Everyone could do it! It's open source! I don't use it myself and I don't have time to spend now. Sorry.
Moreover, I think the pools are bad for cryptocurrencies and they should be avoided if it's possible. It's hard with $15000 bitcoin blocks and $400 litecoin blocks. The block costs about $5 on bbr. Why do you prefer to give your power to some pool instead of getting more hashrate and helping the network by running the full node?
Right on....
Any plans on making this working with CryptoNote multiminer instead?
I think so,mbk,thx to you Moreover, I think the pools are bad for cryptocurrencies and they should be avoided if it's possible. It's hard with $15000 bitcoin blocks and $400 litecoin blocks. The block costs about $5 on bbr. Why do you prefer to give your power to some pool instead of getting more hashrate and helping the network by running the full node?
Added the release. It works on bbr.farm:1111 and makes about 80% of solo version.
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it.
Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me
1. I didn't change the get_whole_scratchpad so if it has a bug (looks like it has) it's better to contact the main branch developer as well.
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it.
Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me
Right on....
Any plans on making this working with CryptoNote multiminer instead?
July 30, 2014, 03:44:59 AM
Everyone could do it! It's open source! I don't use it myself and I don't have time to spend now. Sorry.
Moreover, I think the pools are bad for cryptocurrencies and they should be avoided if it's possible. It's hard with $15000 bitcoin blocks and $400 litecoin blocks. The block costs about $5 on bbr. Why do you prefer to give your power to some pool instead of getting more hashrate and helping the network by running the full node?
Right on....
Any plans on making this working with CryptoNote multiminer instead?
Moreover, I think the pools are bad for cryptocurrencies and they should be avoided if it's possible. It's hard with $15000 bitcoin blocks and $400 litecoin blocks. The block costs about $5 on bbr. Why do you prefer to give your power to some pool instead of getting more hashrate and helping the network by running the full node?
Added the release. It works on bbr.farm:1111 and makes about 80% of solo version.
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it.
Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me
1. I didn't change the get_whole_scratchpad so if it has a bug (looks like it has) it's better to contact the main branch developer as well.
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it.
Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me
Right on....
Any plans on making this working with CryptoNote multiminer instead?
July 30, 2014, 03:34:34 AM
OK. The pool doesn't send valid job until we submit invalid share! Done it this way again. Released a new version.
Added the release. It works on bbr.farm:1111 and makes about 80% of solo version.
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it.
Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me
Weird. I was testing there, too. Just kept looping "Job difficulty is 0. Skipping the job." Guess it IS just me. What could be different?1. I didn't change the get_whole_scratchpad so if it has a bug (looks like it has) it's better to contact the main branch developer as well.
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it.
Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me
July 30, 2014, 01:25:53 AM
Topped it! (nsfw as always): http://www.suerobphotography.com/resources/WM_British_Wildlife/Red%20Fox%20yawning%20300dpi%20IMG_5426%20wm.jpg
790kh/s, 750Ti @ stock clocks
790kh/s, 750Ti @ stock clocks
great. but you make me a little jealous.
maybe I try to to ignore you until you reveal the code.
July 27, 2014, 08:11:32 AM
Main post can be updated with 750Ti hashrate, about 420kh/s.
July 30, 2014, 01:03:36 AM
Hi mbk,
two of my rigs running fine since 1.5 days.
but boolbd stops on my third rig this night:
two of my rigs running fine since 1.5 days.
but boolbd stops on my third rig this night:
Code:
2014-Jul-30 03:47:47.422793 [miner 1]Share found 530538926,
hr: 2955566, efficiency: 99% (shares 19098/19193, blocks 1/1)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
July 29, 2014, 10:04:52 PM
Added the release. It works on bbr.farm:1111 and makes about 80% of solo version.
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it.
Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me
Weird. I was testing there, too. Just kept looping "Job difficulty is 0. Skipping the job." Guess it IS just me. What could be different?1. I didn't change the get_whole_scratchpad so if it has a bug (looks like it has) it's better to contact the main branch developer as well.
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it.
Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me
Code:
2014-Jul-29 19:44:57.422640 Job difficulty is 0. Skipping the job.
2014-Jul-29 19:45:00.422812 avg hr: 0
2014-Jul-29 19:45:00.424812 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-29 19:45:00.511817 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-29 19:45:00.518818 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-29 19:45:00.526818 Job difficulty is 0. Skipping the job.
Jump to: