Topic: [BBR] Boolberry GPU Miner Discussion - AMD & Nvidia - OpenCL & CUDA - page 23. (Read 82978 times)
July 24, 2014, 10:18:12 PM
The download link for windows binary doesn't work?
July 24, 2014, 07:31:37 PM
If a 280x can mine BBR at 900khs then what does that come out to per day in BTC at current prices? Anyone have examples?
sorry for tripple posting
they have a calc = http://boolberry.extremepool.org/
actual 900khash/s = 4.6BBR/day x 0,0005btc = 0,0023btc
Also, is there a short guide on where to get the miner and how to configure?
There ia a pool list in the first post of main thread.
I will put something together and place in first post of this thread.
Are any of the pools working properly with the OpenCL simpleminer? I try to mine, but it seem like the shares aren't being submitted and/or I have the setup wrong? What's the exact setup up for the simpleminer? I mine fine with the simpleminer for cpu and the cpu multi-miner.
Make sure you are using the HTTP port which is usually 1111.
I did.
July 24, 2014, 07:29:58 PM
If a 280x can mine BBR at 900khs then what does that come out to per day in BTC at current prices? Anyone have examples?
sorry for tripple posting
they have a calc = http://boolberry.extremepool.org/
actual 900khash/s = 4.6BBR/day x 0,0005btc = 0,0023btc
Also, is there a short guide on where to get the miner and how to configure?
There ia a pool list in the first post of main thread.
I will put something together and place in first post of this thread.
Are any of the pools working properly with the OpenCL simpleminer? I try to mine, but it seem like the shares aren't being submitted and/or I have the setup wrong? What's the exact setup up for the simpleminer? I mine fine with the simpleminer for cpu and the cpu multi-miner.
Make sure you are using the HTTP port which is usually 1111.
July 24, 2014, 07:14:01 PM
If a 280x can mine BBR at 900khs then what does that come out to per day in BTC at current prices? Anyone have examples?
sorry for tripple posting
they have a calc = http://boolberry.extremepool.org/
actual 900khash/s = 4.6BBR/day x 0,0005btc = 0,0023btc
Also, is there a short guide on where to get the miner and how to configure?
There ia a pool list in the first post of main thread.
I will put something together and place in first post of this thread.
Are any of the pools working properly with the OpenCL simpleminer? I try to mine on bbr.farm, but it seems like the shares aren't being submitted and/or I have the setup wrong? The miner says submitted share, but I don't know if it's even hashing right. What's the exact setup up for the simpleminer? I mine fine with the simpleminer for cpu and the cpu multi-miner.
July 24, 2014, 04:55:50 PM
If a 280x can mine BBR at 900khs then what does that come out to per day in BTC at current prices? Anyone have examples?
sorry for tripple posting
they have a calc = http://boolberry.extremepool.org/
actual 900khash/s = 4.6BBR/day x 0,0005btc = 0,0023btc
Also, is there a short guide on where to get the miner and how to configure?
There ia a pool list in the first post of main thread.
I will put something together and place in first post of this thread.
July 24, 2014, 04:46:47 PM
If a 280x can mine BBR at 900khs then what does that come out to per day in BTC at current prices? Anyone have examples?
sorry for tripple posting
they have a calc = http://boolberry.extremepool.org/
actual 900khash/s = 4.6BBR/day x 0,0005btc = 0,0023btc
Also, is there a short guide on where to get the miner and how to configure?
July 24, 2014, 04:41:00 PM
mbk, I'm having the same issue. I think i fixed it but brought up another issue.
I updated gcc from 4.6 to 4.8.3 and now im getting this:
I updated gcc from 4.6 to 4.8.3 and now im getting this:
...and how you fixed it? just by update gcc to 4.8.3? I used 4.8.1...
Sorry I used 4.8.1 - its still not fixed tho because of the c11 error.
July 24, 2014, 04:36:49 PM
If a 280x can mine BBR at 900khs then what does that come out to per day in BTC at current prices? Anyone have examples?
sorry for tripple posting
they have a calc = http://boolberry.extremepool.org/
actual 900khash/s = 4.6BBR/day x 0,0005btc = 0,0023btc
July 24, 2014, 04:33:53 PM
When building on Linux you should:
1. Run 'make clean' if you got back here after some problems.
1. Set CUDA_PATH or AMDAPPSDKROOT, run 'printenv' to check.
2. Run 'make' and watch for OpenCL: Searching for NVIDIA CUDA SDK or OpenCL: Searching for AMD APP SDK. Back to 1st step if it's not in the log.
3. Watch for -- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_x - found. Check the environment variable points to the actual SDK directory if it's not in the log and get back to 1st step.
4. Check the other dependencies were found (Boost).
5. Compilation should start.
1. Run 'make clean' if you got back here after some problems.
1. Set CUDA_PATH or AMDAPPSDKROOT, run 'printenv' to check.
2. Run 'make' and watch for OpenCL: Searching for NVIDIA CUDA SDK or OpenCL: Searching for AMD APP SDK. Back to 1st step if it's not in the log.
3. Watch for -- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_x - found. Check the environment variable points to the actual SDK directory if it's not in the log and get back to 1st step.
4. Check the other dependencies were found (Boost).
5. Compilation should start.
first steps clear. CUDA_PATH set. printenv checked.
3. is the problem. -- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_1 - found - is ok - but afterwards the compiler shows my beloved message:
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:108 (message):
Could NOT find OpenCL (missing: OPENCL_LIBRARY) (found version "1.1")
with the boolberry miner version from the 22. July (you fixed backward compatibility after for openCL 1.1/1.0) he shows the right path afterwards:
-- Found OpenCL: /usr/local/cuda/include (found version "1.1")
...and failed later (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7972653)
but with the actual version I did not get so far.
compiling cudaminer and ccminer forks were no problem so far.
July 24, 2014, 04:02:24 PM
mbk, I'm having the same issue. I think i fixed it but brought up another issue.
I updated gcc from 4.6 to 4.8.3 and now im getting this:
I updated gcc from 4.6 to 4.8.3 and now im getting this:
...and how you fixed it? just by update gcc to 4.8.3? I used 4.8.1...
July 24, 2014, 03:47:16 PM
If a 280x can mine BBR at 900khs then what does that come out to per day in BTC at current prices? Anyone have examples?
July 24, 2014, 01:18:32 PM
When building on Linux you should:
1. Run 'make clean' if you got back here after some problems.
1. Set CUDA_PATH or AMDAPPSDKROOT, run 'printenv' to check.
2. Run 'make' and watch for OpenCL: Searching for NVIDIA CUDA SDK or OpenCL: Searching for AMD APP SDK. Back to 1st step if it's not in the log.
3. Watch for -- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_x - found. Check the environment variable points to the actual SDK directory if it's not in the log and get back to 1st step.
4. Check the other dependencies were found (Boost).
5. Compilation should start.
1. Run 'make clean' if you got back here after some problems.
1. Set CUDA_PATH or AMDAPPSDKROOT, run 'printenv' to check.
2. Run 'make' and watch for OpenCL: Searching for NVIDIA CUDA SDK or OpenCL: Searching for AMD APP SDK. Back to 1st step if it's not in the log.
3. Watch for -- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_x - found. Check the environment variable points to the actual SDK directory if it's not in the log and get back to 1st step.
4. Check the other dependencies were found (Boost).
5. Compilation should start.
mbk, I'm having the same issue. I think i fixed it but brought up another issue. I updated gcc from 4.6 to 4.8.3 and now im getting this:
[ 1%] Building C object contrib/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/igd_desc_parse.c.o
error: invalid value 'c11' in '-std=c11'
make[2]: *** [contrib/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/igd_desc_parse.c.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [contrib/miniupnpc/CMakeFiles/upnpc-static.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
July 24, 2014, 10:34:30 AM
Yes. You can mine to the same address with any number of solo miners. You'll see your blocks in your wallet connected to any boolbd instance.
Hello! if I will mine three rigs to one address (solo). This means that I can find a block 3 times faster or not? and when I find the block with all rigs SHARES me towards my?
July 24, 2014, 10:27:47 AM
When building on Linux you should:
1. Run 'make clean' if you got back here after some problems.
1. Set CUDA_PATH or AMDAPPSDKROOT, run 'printenv' to check.
2. Run 'make' and watch for OpenCL: Searching for NVIDIA CUDA SDK or OpenCL: Searching for AMD APP SDK. Back to 1st step if it's not in the log.
3. Watch for -- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_x - found. Check the environment variable points to the actual SDK directory if it's not in the log and get back to 1st step.
4. Check the other dependencies were found (Boost).
5. Compilation should start.
mbk, thanks for re-checking.
Today I build up a clean unbuntu installation from the scratch, also in an virtualbox VM.
I used ubuntu 13.10 with the cuda 5.5 toolkit - the same base as used in kopiemtu.
but, I got exactly the same nasty error as before
your readme.md become great over the last days... so nothing seems unclear... but I don't know where the (my?) error could be.
maybe it does not work with cuda 5.5... maybe I make something wrong.
I was really interessted in mining BBR. But I just give up for the moment...
Thanks for trying to help.
1. Run 'make clean' if you got back here after some problems.
1. Set CUDA_PATH or AMDAPPSDKROOT, run 'printenv' to check.
2. Run 'make' and watch for OpenCL: Searching for NVIDIA CUDA SDK or OpenCL: Searching for AMD APP SDK. Back to 1st step if it's not in the log.
3. Watch for -- Looking for CL_VERSION_1_x - found. Check the environment variable points to the actual SDK directory if it's not in the log and get back to 1st step.
4. Check the other dependencies were found (Boost).
5. Compilation should start.
I've updated Linux build instructions in README.md. I tested both ways - AMD and Nvidia myself on clean Ubuntu 14.04 in Virtualbox and it works flawlessly. Run 'make clean' after you change build options.
mbk, thanks for re-checking.
Today I build up a clean unbuntu installation from the scratch, also in an virtualbox VM.
I used ubuntu 13.10 with the cuda 5.5 toolkit - the same base as used in kopiemtu.
but, I got exactly the same nasty error as before
your readme.md become great over the last days... so nothing seems unclear... but I don't know where the (my?) error could be.
maybe it does not work with cuda 5.5... maybe I make something wrong.
I was really interessted in mining BBR. But I just give up for the moment...
Thanks for trying to help.
July 24, 2014, 09:47:52 AM
I've updated Linux build instructions in README.md. I tested both ways - AMD and Nvidia myself on clean Ubuntu 14.04 in Virtualbox and it works flawlessly. Run 'make clean' after you change build options.
mbk, thanks for re-checking.
Today I build up a clean unbuntu installation from the scratch, also in an virtualbox VM.
I used ubuntu 13.10 with the cuda 5.5 toolkit - the same base as used in kopiemtu.
but, I got exactly the same nasty error as before
your readme.md become great over the last days... so nothing seems unclear... but I don't know where the (my?) error could be.
maybe it does not work with cuda 5.5... maybe I make something wrong.
I was really interessted in mining BBR. But I just give up for the moment...
Thanks for trying to help.
July 24, 2014, 05:47:52 AM
Hello! if I will mine three rigs to one address (solo). This means that I can find a block 3 times faster or not? and when I find the block with all rigs SHARES me towards my?
July 23, 2014, 12:13:57 PM
I've updated Linux build instructions in README.md. I tested both ways - AMD and Nvidia myself on clean Ubuntu 14.04 in Virtualbox and it works flawlessly. Run 'make clean' after you change build options.
I edit my post above... he founds openCL... but it is still missing.
my compiler seems schizophrenic
OK. Try to set OPENCL_ROOT as you did before. Don't forget to pull last update from github.
I edit my post above... he founds openCL... but it is still missing.
my compiler seems schizophrenic
July 23, 2014, 11:13:21 AM
Merged updates from the main branch. Updated executables in the Release section too.
https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
July 23, 2014, 01:35:10 AM
I've not been able to get this to work on nvidia. Any tips? Specific cuda version required?
I did it, on my 860M.
EDIT: Trick is to define some of the variables it tells you to in the opencl cmake file comments.
...and how? please show us the light.
I stranded as you could read here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7972653
You had to edit the code to get it to work - I think he fixed that, though.
July 23, 2014, 09:04:22 AM
ok then you can add to the test matrix 6990 1160 kh/s
6950 540 kh/s
if there is any hardware matrix i would add the results
(note the results are with the 2 % fee added. dunno if devel makes the hardware hash slower with fees are disabled)
6950 540 kh/s
if there is any hardware matrix i would add the results
(note the results are with the 2 % fee added. dunno if devel makes the hardware hash slower with fees are disabled)
Jump to: