THANKS FOR AN INTERESTING POST! --
I check this thread daily; your post was a breath of fresh air! On a heavier note, it is sad to watch the hashrate for BoolBerry decline. The coin needs some perks. A new exchange is my idea for better circulation.
TradeOgre will list a coin without taking a fee. There is a "New Coin" application form downloadable on the exchange site, more miners should fill one out. BoolBerry (BBR) was worth over a dollar per coin not so long ago. There was a lot of trade activity on STEX prior to the launch of Zano.
Just posting here is enough to stimulate some interest. BBR's "wildkeccak" is a low-energy algorithm and minable with GTX 750ti cards. The 750ti rig that I have is nearly silent, and sips electricity. The coin is just too good to let it slip into oblivion.
Knock on TradeOgre's door, get BoolBerry listed! --scryptr
Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 2. (Read 1210793 times)
August 18, 2020, 10:04:48 AM
August 18, 2020, 07:06:08 AM
Hello fellow boolberrians!
For those who missed it, yesterday we had our first live interview ever of zoidberg with Seth Estrada over youtube, you can watch it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcqRbLnZ_vQ&t=1s
Hope you like it, you can actually put a face over his name for the first time!
For those who missed it, yesterday we had our first live interview ever of zoidberg with Seth Estrada over youtube, you can watch it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcqRbLnZ_vQ&t=1s
Hope you like it, you can actually put a face over his name for the first time!
August 16, 2020, 07:54:12 AM
I think boolberry needs some new original shiny feature(s) to get it out of its oblivion. I do not know which these features are, sorry 
. Though bitcoin is old and not to much advanced still it is the most popular...
Most cryptocoin people are not nerds _sorry_ . They do not care about discusing some code advantages. They just see hype. They are emotional!
Anyway to be honest, about 2 years ago now, when I just heard about Zoidberg`s new project start (zano) my first thought was - boolberry is doomed. No offence meant.
. Though bitcoin is old and not to much advanced still it is the most popular...Most cryptocoin people are not nerds _sorry
_ . They do not care about discusing some code advantages. They just see hype. They are emotional! Anyway to be honest, about 2 years ago now, when I just heard about Zoidberg`s new project start (zano) my first thought was - boolberry is doomed. No offence meant.
On btc-alpha there are happening mysterious things: bbr, dash, zec are available again, but ltc vanished. Watching it, be careful. If anybody has information about it, tell please.
It seems btc-alpha is delisting some coins, BBR is one of them. STEX is running, but with KYC only. Time to search for a new exchange.
BOOLBERRY SHOULD BE LISTED ON TRADEOGRE--
I have read that there is no fee involved in listing a coin on TradeOgre. However, it may require a group effort.
Zano is listed on TradeOgre, it would be good to keep the classic BoolBerry on the same exchange. Easier for the developer to keep track of his older project, at least.
Boolberry is a low-energy, low-stress coin. I mine it with my 750ti cards, and they are very efficient even today.
Please suggest any other decent exchange you may be familiar with. --scryptr
TradeOgr don't list for a fee to my knowledge.
Zano got listed there because Zano community been active on that, and been reaching out exchange.
I guess this is what the Boolberry community supposed to do.
It seems btc-alpha is delisting some coins, BBR is one of them. STEX is running, but with KYC only. Time to search for a new exchange.
BOOLBERRY SHOULD BE LISTED ON TRADEOGRE--
I have read that there is no fee involved in listing a coin on TradeOgre. However, it may require a group effort.
Zano is listed on TradeOgre, it would be good to keep the classic BoolBerry on the same exchange. Easier for the developer to keep track of his older project, at least.
Boolberry is a low-energy, low-stress coin. I mine it with my 750ti cards, and they are very efficient even today.
Please suggest any other decent exchange you may be familiar with. --scryptr
It seems btc-alpha is delisting some coins, BBR is one of them. STEX is running, but with KYC only. Time to search for a new exchange.
Anyone else is willing to give his opinion regarding how we supposed to spend donation?
It's important, please, give your feedback, we need to collect as much info as possible.
IMPROVE THE WALLET--
Nothing really major, but the current wallet does not display the version. It does not need a major upgrade, just see if you can improve what it is. Cosmetics, check the code for tiny flaws. --scryptr
P.S.- Please get the coin listed on TradeOgre alongside Zano. If there are requirements for BBR enthusiasts, please post them here. Any other exchange listings would be a great achievement as well. --scryptr
Anyone else is willing to give his opinion regarding how we supposed to spend donation?
It's important, please, give your feedback, we need to collect as much info as possible.
...
As I mentioned earlier, basically I see few major options:
1. Add more listing(s)
2. Do development and take some improvements from Zano.
3. Hire some marketing group
4. Mix of 1/2/3
I personally think that more listings won't change the picture a lot since the project may look not actively developed. Marketing may help. And development of course, but I guess I think so because I'm developer.
Opinions?
As I mentioned earlier, basically I see few major options:
1. Add more listing(s)
2. Do development and take some improvements from Zano.
3. Hire some marketing group
4. Mix of 1/2/3
I personally think that more listings won't change the picture a lot since the project may look not actively developed. Marketing may help. And development of course, but I guess I think so because I'm developer.
Opinions?
i think in rather reasonable averages (absolute rationality does not exist for me), so i try.
1. medium of three listings (at this time), at least two, preferably not more than four. I know stex and btc-alpha at this time. So i see a light pressure for a third one. (I like coinex, altilly, and southxchange)
2. not enough expertise for this. Economically the code has to deescalate deflections (example is the heavily fluctuant historic decred stake reward after launch, or the heavy fluctuation of transfer fees of the bitcoin (NOT their amount), they are a sign of deficiency in coding decisions), and to give small instances a light advantage to big instances (in mining/minting for example).
3. In my opinion less important, better is recommendation. If done then be neutral, concentrate on Boolberries advantages, and never make poor other competing crypto-currencies.
1./ Exchanges- Stex & Alpha KYC so I'd recommend a non KYC for a privacy coin like TradeOgre (Listings by community requests) or maybe Qtrade another non KYC that only lists quality/heavy developed coins/projects or any others that have genuine volume and no required daily trading volume that only increases volume bots etc...
2. I think we have covered boss, so the fork choice rule (https://github.com/hyle-team/docs/blob/master/zano/PoS_Analysis_and_improvements_proposal.pdf) PT II: Fluctiation of fee's vs BTC/cost basis/weight, not sure I'm understanding your question, appreciate more info or feedback, thx.
3. Well this might be the bit I break your heart on BBR, much like me you seem to have made an emotional attachment to BBR, yet it's simply a version of the same guy's code. So we started with the original CN protocol and design, then we had boolberry with major improvements over and above any other CN at that time including @alias, pruning of blockchain, a GUI (yes back then it was a rarity, well for some anyway). Now we have zano with asynchronous core multi-sig, escrow, E-Commerce on chain, & many more future improvements and enhancements, all made a lot easier and streamlined having the original coders continue to improve their own code rather than have 100 contributors that don't add any value or improvements.
Zano is no "poor other competing crypto-currency" you could not be further from reality. It's leaps and bounds better, most likely to go on to spur another 300+ forks in a few years or 6 months by the needy needing another turn!
Wow very nice to hear more development on Boolberry.
......
TradeOgre doesnt and will not accept listing fees, They will only list coins they want to list. Its important to note that Zano was listed on their own terms. The best way to get BBR listed is fill out the listing form on their site, if enough from the community request it then they maybe will list BBR also
TradeOgre doesnt and will not accept listing fees, They will only list coins they want to list. Its important to note that Zano was listed on their own terms. The best way to get BBR listed is fill out the listing form on their site, if enough from the community request it then they maybe will list BBR also
And this deserves to be respected, does not happen so often these days.
....
BOOLBERRY IS A COIN YOU DEVELOPED--
I sold the handful of Zano coins that I purchased during the "trade-in" period. They weren't enough for any meaningful PoS stake.
Be a developer for Boolberry and get the coin on a new exchange.
Or, stop posting "off-topic" Zano notes in your own Boolberry thread.
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
BOOLBERRY IS A COIN YOU DEVELOPED--
I sold the handful of Zano coins that I purchased during the "trade-in" period. They weren't enough for any meaningful PoS stake.
Be a developer for Boolberry and get the coin on a new exchange.
Or, stop posting "off-topic" Zano notes in your own Boolberry thread.
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
I'm not insulting it, Boolberry got a great evaluation in the form of Zano, we informed everyone that main development efforts would be focused on Zano, most of our holders moved to Zano and they support our work there.
In Boolberry I don't see much actual support, only miners claim that I owe something to everyone who does mining. I've put a lot of effort into Boolberry and didn't earn anything with that project, but been paying for hosting all these years, we still pay for it, still maintain the project and fix problems if it appears.
Also, how on the earth being a developer make me responsible for paying listing fees to exchanges?
IF WISHES WERE HORSES--
Well, perhaps we have a winged horse! The donation of 1 BTC to the project is astounding!
I spent most of yesterday in consideration of a decent response to the quoted message (above) from the lead developer. Logging in this morning I find that the project has a benefactor and a new lifeline.
I'd like to see BoolBerry (BBR) on TradeOgre. As for development, maybe some touch-ups on the wallet. The current wallet does not display the version number.
The most attractive thing about BBR mining is its low-energy algorithm. This I would not wish to change.
Thanks for the new breath of life! In consideration, during 2018 BBR saw some value spikes. The renewed interest in the project should trigger a return of BBR trade vigor!
--scryptr
TradeOgre doesnt and will not accept listing fees, They will only list coins they want to list. Its important to note that Zano was listed on their own terms. The best way to get BBR listed is fill out the listing form on their site, if enough from the community request it then they maybe will list BBR also
....
BOOLBERRY IS A COIN YOU DEVELOPED--
I sold the handful of Zano coins that I purchased during the "trade-in" period. They weren't enough for any meaningful PoS stake.
Be a developer for Boolberry and get the coin on a new exchange.
Or, stop posting "off-topic" Zano notes in your own Boolberry thread.
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
BOOLBERRY IS A COIN YOU DEVELOPED--
I sold the handful of Zano coins that I purchased during the "trade-in" period. They weren't enough for any meaningful PoS stake.
Be a developer for Boolberry and get the coin on a new exchange.
Or, stop posting "off-topic" Zano notes in your own Boolberry thread.
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
I'm not insulting it, Boolberry got a great evaluation in the form of Zano, we informed everyone that main development efforts would be focused on Zano, most of our holders moved to Zano and they support our work there.
In Boolberry I don't see much actual support, only miners claim that I owe something to everyone who does mining. I've put a lot of effort into Boolberry and didn't earn anything with that project, but been paying for hosting all these years, we still pay for it, still maintain the project and fix problems if it appears.
Also, how on the earth being a developer make me responsible for paying listing fees to exchanges?
IF WISHES WERE HORSES--
Well, perhaps we have a winged horse! The donation of 1 BTC to the project is astounding!
I spent most of yesterday in consideration of a decent response to the quoted message (above) from the lead developer. Logging in this morning I find that the project has a benefactor and a new lifeline.
I'd like to see BoolBerry (BBR) on TradeOgre. As for development, maybe some touch-ups on the wallet. The current wallet does not display the version number.
The most attractive thing about BBR mining is its low-energy algorithm. This I would not wish to change.
Thanks for the new breath of life! In consideration, during 2018 BBR saw some value spikes. The renewed interest in the project should trigger a return of BBR trade vigor!
--scryptr
...
As I mentioned earlier, basically I see few major options:
1. Add more listing(s)
2. Do development and take some improvements from Zano.
3. Hire some marketing group
4. Mix of 1/2/3
I personally think that more listings won't change the picture a lot since the project may look not actively developed. Marketing may help. And development of course, but I guess I think so because I'm developer.
Opinions?
As I mentioned earlier, basically I see few major options:
1. Add more listing(s)
2. Do development and take some improvements from Zano.
3. Hire some marketing group
4. Mix of 1/2/3
I personally think that more listings won't change the picture a lot since the project may look not actively developed. Marketing may help. And development of course, but I guess I think so because I'm developer.
Opinions?
i think in rather reasonable averages (absolute rationality does not exist for me), so i try.
1. medium of three listings (at this time), at least two, preferably not more than four. I know stex and btc-alpha at this time. So i see a light pressure for a third one. (I like coinex, altilly, and southxchange)
2. not enough expertise for this. Economically the code has to deescalate deflections (example is the heavily fluctuant historic decred stake reward after launch, or the heavy fluctuation of transfer fees of the bitcoin (NOT their amount), they are a sign of deficiency in coding decisions), and to give small instances a light advantage to big instances (in mining/minting for example).
3. In my opinion less important, better is recommendation. If done then be neutral, concentrate on Boolberries advantages, and never make poor other competing crypto-currencies.
...
Wow, that's interesting.
1Fpuu5Mg9TZvSb4WZfUsPYxkNBwwyu6Bfq
How do you want to spend that?
We can afford one or two listings for that or organize development iterations. What would you prefer?
Wow, that's interesting.
1Fpuu5Mg9TZvSb4WZfUsPYxkNBwwyu6Bfq
How do you want to spend that?
We can afford one or two listings for that or organize development iterations. What would you prefer?
It's on the way ...
Because i see donators forcing conditions to the recipients, and the conditions contradicts each other, i do not.
i'm rather sure you can decide yourself where to invest it best.
Confirmed, 1 BTC received.
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/b255adbb6694f5e34cf8e3168e75581862bc7961ebbc36b6597b0b44483b4c70
Well, didn't expect that, it's appreciated a lot.
We need to think what would be the best way to spend it for Boolberry, and how to make Boolberry benefiting from it the most.
As I mentioned earlier, basically I see few major options:
1. Add more listing(s)
2. Do development and take some improvements from Zano.
3. Hire some marketing group
4. Mix of 1/2/3
I personally think that more listings won't change the picture a lot since the project may look not actively developed. Marketing may help. And development of course, but I guess I think so because I'm developer.
Opinions?
...
Wow, that's interesting.
1Fpuu5Mg9TZvSb4WZfUsPYxkNBwwyu6Bfq
How do you want to spend that?
We can afford one or two listings for that or organize development iterations. What would you prefer?
Wow, that's interesting.
1Fpuu5Mg9TZvSb4WZfUsPYxkNBwwyu6Bfq
How do you want to spend that?
We can afford one or two listings for that or organize development iterations. What would you prefer?
It's on the way ...
Because i see donators forcing conditions to the recipients, and the conditions contradicts each other, i do not.
i'm rather sure you can decide yourself where to invest it best.
...
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
The dev makes a very good job creating a trustful coin, he is not here to make you or anybody rich. And no human person can praise itself, he has to wait on people that use and recommend this coin.
I like diversification, so my wish is a group of devs. It would make the coin less vulnerable against external attacks.
I would be happy to support anyone who is willing to contribute as a developer. For example, in next month I'm planning to review and do reengineering of the wallet sync protocol, this will make wallet dramatically smaller in size and also faster to sync, and it would be great if anyone can also port that code into Boolberry.
i don't have the competence for this, but i would like to donate one Bitcoin for this project. Send me an address please.
Wow, that's interesting.
1Fpuu5Mg9TZvSb4WZfUsPYxkNBwwyu6Bfq
How do you want to spend that?
We can afford one or two listings for that or organize development iterations. What would you prefer?
...
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
The dev makes a very good job creating a trustful coin, he is not here to make you or anybody rich. And no human person can praise itself, he has to wait on people that use and recommend this coin.
I like diversification, so my wish is a group of devs. It would make the coin less vulnerable against external attacks.
I would be happy to support anyone who is willing to contribute as a developer. For example, in next month I'm planning to review and do reengineering of the wallet sync protocol, this will make wallet dramatically smaller in size and also faster to sync, and it would be great if anyone can also port that code into Boolberry.
i don't have the competence for this, but i would like to donate one Bitcoin for this project. Send me an address please.
...
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
My point is, please do something to stimulate a coin that you developed: BOOLBERRY. That is all. Zano is just fine, but I don't mine Zano. I do mine Boolberry, and you should not be insulting your own child. --scryptr
The dev makes a very good job creating a trustful coin, he is not here to make you or anybody rich. And no human person can praise itself, he has to wait on people that use and recommend this coin.
I like diversification, so my wish is a group of devs. It would make the coin less vulnerable against external attacks.
I would be happy to support anyone who is willing to contribute as a developer. For example, in next month I'm planning to review and do reengineering of the wallet sync protocol, this will make wallet dramatically smaller in size and also faster to sync, and it would be great if anyone can also port that code into Boolberry.
Jump to: