[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 420.

baigreen

full member

Activity: 625

Merit: 100

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on June 13, 2014, 02:46:52 AM

Well, you can, but with some trick.
It's a known issue, bad design. To open wallet, that generated under linux please remove wallet-data file(DON'T DELETE WALLET KEYS FILE), and in open file dialog select wallet keys file. It will resync wallet and should work fine.
Wallet data files are different.
Will fix it soon.

Test Okay.
Thanks. work fine.

baigreen

full member

Activity: 625

Merit: 100

Quote from: sdersdf2 on June 13, 2014, 02:32:28 AM

I realise you have a very full plate, but are there any plans to make it easier for people to transfer their coins between exchanges? What are your thoughts on this?

That is the cryponote coin's reason.
All cryponote coins are all like this, need pay id.

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: baigreen on June 12, 2014, 09:32:09 PM

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on June 12, 2014, 08:45:05 PM

Good news!

I've uploaded preview version of GUI with wallet functions (windows build).
This is early alpha version, beware of bugs. It's actually just first version that able to send and receive money, pretty ugly.

Everyone who want to have fun:
boolberry.com/downloads.html

What next:
0. Integrate qt-daemon into build system
1. Build and test it for Mac and Linux
2. Preapare normal deploy binaries
3. Adjust html layout to make it looking nice
4. add address aliases support
5. add multi-recipient feature
6. implement tray-mode
7. Add multiple wallets support (work with few opened wallets)
.....
we have a tons of work ahead.....

GUI branch:
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/GUI
(boost libs path hardcoded, will be fixed tomorow)

Great work!!!!
BBR will be the first cryptonote coin which have gui wallet~~~

I have test this new version build windows version.
One problem:
I can not open wallet file which generated on linux.
Is this a bug?

Well, you can, but with some trick.
It's a known issue, bad design. To open wallet, that generated under linux please remove wallet-data file(DON'T DELETE WALLET KEYS FILE), and in open file dialog select wallet keys file. It will resync wallet and should work fine.
Wallet data files are different.
Will fix it soon.

sdersdf2

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on June 12, 2014, 08:45:05 PM

Good news!

I've uploaded preview version of GUI with wallet functions (windows build).
This is early alpha version, beware of bugs. It's actually just first version that able to send and receive money, pretty ugly.

Everyone who want to have fun:
boolberry.com/downloads.html

What next:
0. Integrate qt-daemon into build system
1. Build and test it for Mac and Linux
2. Preapare normal deploy binaries
3. Adjust html layout to make it looking nice
4. add address aliases support
5. add multi-recipient feature
6. implement tray-mode
7. Add multiple wallets support (work with few opened wallets)
.....
we have a tons of work ahead.....

GUI branch:
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/GUI
(boost libs path hardcoded, will be fixed tomorow)

I realise you have a very full plate, but are there any plans to make it easier for people to transfer their coins between exchanges? What are your thoughts on this?

BBmodBB

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

BTC = FREEDOM IS OUR ONLY HOPE!

Quote from: slavo on June 12, 2014, 07:25:54 AM

why did you chose this name ?

It seems not a really good name for a currency to me. I'm thinking of buying but that name just keep me away for now.

I'll buy some if you make me a good offer through pm's Cheesy

anyway good luck !

lol thats what threw me off at first! ~ no this looks like a great team we have here!!!

Cool

//^$GOGOGOOOOOOOO+ /\BBR --((( *coolie high!* )))--

====> https://www.poloniex.com/exchange/btc_bbr

btc-mike

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Quote from: forzendiablo on June 12, 2014, 10:07:56 PM

i doubt gui wallet will ever come heh Sad

Surprise! Look up two posts for the first Windows qt version.

forzendiablo

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1000

the grandpa of cryptos

i doubt gui wallet will ever come heh Sad

baigreen

full member

Activity: 625

Merit: 100

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on June 12, 2014, 08:45:05 PM

Good news!

I've uploaded preview version of GUI with wallet functions (windows build).
This is early alpha version, beware of bugs. It's actually just first version that able to send and receive money, pretty ugly.

Everyone who want to have fun:
boolberry.com/downloads.html

What next:
0. Integrate qt-daemon into build system
1. Build and test it for Mac and Linux
2. Preapare normal deploy binaries
3. Adjust html layout to make it looking nice
4. add address aliases support
5. add multi-recipient feature
6. implement tray-mode
7. Add multiple wallets support (work with few opened wallets)
.....
we have a tons of work ahead.....

GUI branch:
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/GUI
(boost libs path hardcoded, will be fixed tomorow)

Great work!!!!
BBR will be the first cryptonote coin which have gui wallet~~~

I have test this new version build windows version.
One problem:
I can not open wallet file which generated on linux.
Is this a bug?

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Good news!

I've uploaded preview version of GUI with wallet functions (windows build).
This is early alpha version, beware of bugs. It's actually just first version that able to send and receive money, pretty ugly.

Everyone who want to have fun:
boolberry.com/downloads.html

What next:
0. Integrate qt-daemon into build system
1. Build and test it for Mac and Linux
2. Preapare normal deploy binaries
3. Adjust html layout to make it looking nice
4. add address aliases support
5. add multi-recipient feature
6. implement tray-mode
7. Add multiple wallets support (work with few opened wallets)
.....
we have a tons of work ahead.....

GUI branch:
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/GUI
(boost libs path hardcoded, will be fixed tomorow)

cubydu

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

http://79.135.200.108/
Pool on maintenance mode. We return tomorrow(06.13). Sorry

btc-mike

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Forum email is fixed. You can register here -> http://boolberry.com/forum/index.php

If you already registered and did not receive email, send me a pm with the username or email you used. I will resend confirmation.

dga

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 511

Quote from: uvt9 on June 12, 2014, 12:27:18 PM

total hashrate of all the pool is less than 5 MH/s while network hash rate is 2GH/s, i wonder where is all the rest ? Wild Keccak algorithm is supposed to be much more effecient for GPU mining, right ?

Solo is still decently more efficient than pool -- probably 25%, depending on where you are located relative to the pool. Slowly fixing that, but for now, if you have a few machines, you're better off running solo than using one of the pools. Or run your own pool on the same LAN as your workers -- that part is working very well and achieving nearly as good efficiency as the daemon miner.

uvt9

sr. member

Activity: 300

Merit: 250

total hashrate of all the pool is less than 5 MH/s while network hash rate is 2GH/s, i wonder where is all the rest ? Wild Keccak algorithm is supposed to be much more effecient for GPU mining, right ?

btc-mike

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Quote from: baigreen on June 12, 2014, 04:19:34 AM

@crypto_zoidberg
@btc-mike

Can you modify this thread's content more beautiful and technological？

1. Font color and size
2. Friendly pics and logos
3. Clearly layout

Thanks very very much！

Check other coins for example:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-revamped-pinkcoin-pc-pink-pos-multipool-fundraiser-anonymous-624017
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ktk-kryptkoin-phr-phore-check-new-ann-606809
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-silkcoin-new-wallet-now-on-mintpal-cryptsy-full-pos-599438

I am working on updates to first post. It won't be beautiful (yet).

I am also working to correct mail issue on forum. Almost done.

cubydu

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: dga on June 12, 2014, 10:23:12 AM

Quote from: cubydu on June 11, 2014, 09:06:21 PM

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on June 11, 2014, 09:03:17 PM

Quote from: cubydu on June 11, 2014, 08:41:19 PM

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on June 11, 2014, 08:35:05 PM

no updated simpleminer for Linux?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/g6epxz9t6axqgg1/simpleminer

this is the updated one?

It's simpleminer with latest fix from dga

It's not merged yet

I've set up my own local pool to test on and the fix seems OK, as you noted. I've submitted a pull request for it.

I also changed some of the settings in the pool config for vardiff to make it adapt faster - maybe a bit too aggressive because I have a fast CPU, but probably similar to what you did:

"varDiff": {
"minDiff": 500000,
"maxDiff": 10000000,
"targetTime": 100,
"retargetTime": 15,
"variancePercent": 50,
"maxJump": 200000
},

With these changes on a *local* and unloaded pool I was getting 320kh/s. It's probably less on a remote pool, of course, but getting better. That's much closer to what solo would get.

Next up, I'll try to improve the hash rate of the miner a little. I don't manage the multiple threads very efficiently, so it's only getting 630% of CPU on my machine, where it should be getting about 780%. I can get this improved soon (maybe by tomorrow), I think.

My pool works with

"varDiff": {
"minDiff": 50000,
"maxDiff": 10000000,
"targetTime": 10,
"retargetTime": 5,
"variancePercent": 30,
"maxJump": 500000
},

Zer0Sum

legendary

Activity: 1588

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cubydu on June 12, 2014, 09:54:52 AM

Quote from: Zer0Sum on June 12, 2014, 09:26:19 AM

Quote from: dga on June 12, 2014, 06:46:27 AM

The bright side is that this means the coin is still extremely profitable for home miners once we can get the pools running as efficiently as solo. It's very rare for a coin to be so profitable as to be mineable on EC2. My i7-4770 is getting $2/day of BBR. Before the cryptonote coins came around, it was getting less than $0.50 per day mining Riecoin.

For me with 4-5 i7s...
Ducks and Mount appear to be more profitable than BBR...
And the payout is consistent (for random payouts I wouldn't bother).

There will be a flood of CNotes... then a thinning of the herd.

BBR logo should be a big strawberry with a bite out of it...
Maybe we get lucky and Apple Inc tries to sue... seriously.

And what can you do with MNT? Grin

Like superresistant...
I can almost touch and feel them, etc...

Also CNotes are now like 20-30% of Poloniex business...
They should be happy to list every one that comes along.

dga

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 511

Quote from: cubydu on June 11, 2014, 09:06:21 PM

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on June 11, 2014, 09:03:17 PM

Quote from: cubydu on June 11, 2014, 08:41:19 PM

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on June 11, 2014, 08:35:05 PM

no updated simpleminer for Linux?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/g6epxz9t6axqgg1/simpleminer

this is the updated one?

It's simpleminer with latest fix from dga

It's not merged yet

I've set up my own local pool to test on and the fix seems OK, as you noted. I've submitted a pull request for it.

I also changed some of the settings in the pool config for vardiff to make it adapt faster - maybe a bit too aggressive because I have a fast CPU, but probably similar to what you did:

"varDiff": {
"minDiff": 500000,
"maxDiff": 10000000,
"targetTime": 100,
"retargetTime": 15,
"variancePercent": 50,
"maxJump": 200000
},

With these changes on a *local* and unloaded pool I was getting 320kh/s. It's probably less on a remote pool, of course, but getting better. That's much closer to what solo would get.

Next up, I'll try to improve the hash rate of the miner a little. I don't manage the multiple threads very efficiently, so it's only getting 630% of CPU on my machine, where it should be getting about 780%. I can get this improved soon (maybe by tomorrow), I think.

loremipsum

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 501

Quote from: dga on June 12, 2014, 06:46:27 AM

Quote from: loremipsum on June 12, 2014, 03:39:09 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: cubydu on June 11, 2014, 08:53:39 PM

Someone mine with supercomputer Huh

Someone mines with GPUs and someone else mines with Amazon ec2.

How can you tell if the increase in the hashrate is because of ec2 or GPU mining?

Price is one hint. The EC2 spot market costs about $0.27 per hour for a big compute machine, plus some data transfer charges, etc., etc. Let's call it $0.30 total. That machine gets about 1.2mhash/s. (Probably 1.3, but I'm conservative).

An EC2 miner will launch when:

Code:

 hash/s       one day          reward                           cost/day
(1200000 * 86400 / diff) * 17 * price * BTC/USD > (24*0.3)     (this is about $7.50/day)

Last night, diff was 90B, price was 0.001:

Code:

1200000*86400/90000000000 * 17 * .001 * 630
12.33792000000000000000

It was EC2. A cloud miner was making $12 for every $7.50 s/he spent.

This morning, price is down to .0008 and diff is back up to 115:

Code:

1200000*86400/114000000000 * 17 * .0008 * 630
7.79237052631578947070

(which is just about at the breakeven point). That means we'll start to see the instances be killed and the diff drop off slowly.

I bet if you do the analysis, you'll observe that the difficulty of mining BBR over the last few weeks has almost exactly matched the cost to mine it at 1.3mh/s on AWS at $0.27/hour. This is the most easily available, scalable source of CPU for miners.

The bright side is that this means the coin is still extremely profitable for home miners once we can get the pools running as efficiently as solo. It's very rare for a coin to be so profitable as to be mineable on EC2. My i7-4770 is getting $2/day of BBR. Before the cryptonote coins came around, it was getting less than $0.50 per day mining Riecoin.

Thanks for the very detailed answer!

superresistant

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1131

Quote from: Zer0Sum on June 12, 2014, 09:26:19 AM

Quote from: dga on June 12, 2014, 06:46:27 AM

The bright side is that this means the coin is still extremely profitable for home miners once we can get the pools running as efficiently as solo. It's very rare for a coin to be so profitable as to be mineable on EC2. My i7-4770 is getting $2/day of BBR. Before the cryptonote coins came around, it was getting less than $0.50 per day mining Riecoin.

For me with 4-5 i7s...
Ducks and Mount appear to be more profitable than BBR...
And the payout is consistent (for random payouts I wouldn't bother).
There will be a flood of CNotes... then a thinning of the herd.
BBR logo should be a big strawberry with a bite out of it...
Maybe we get lucky and Apple Inc tries to sue... seriously.

I own a duckNote pool BTW along with a Monero pool (with a friend):

http://monero.crypto-pool.fr/
http://duck.crypto-pool.fr/

Lowest orphan rate, optimized code.
Soon DDOS protection as we got attacked yesterday.

cubydu

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Zer0Sum on June 12, 2014, 09:26:19 AM

Quote from: dga on June 12, 2014, 06:46:27 AM

The bright side is that this means the coin is still extremely profitable for home miners once we can get the pools running as efficiently as solo. It's very rare for a coin to be so profitable as to be mineable on EC2. My i7-4770 is getting $2/day of BBR. Before the cryptonote coins came around, it was getting less than $0.50 per day mining Riecoin.

For me with 4-5 i7s...
Ducks and Mount appear to be more profitable than BBR...
And the payout is consistent (for random payouts I wouldn't bother).

There will be a flood of CNotes... then a thinning of the herd.

BBR logo should be a big strawberry with a bite out of it...
Maybe we get lucky and Apple Inc tries to sue... seriously.

And what can you do with MNT? Grin

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 420. (Read 1210783 times)