Just curiosity: What would this "detaxing" mean in this context? Do the US have a tax for simple monetary transactions, or would this mean people would not have to pay VAT if they pay with BTC?
My understanding is that you can spend your bitcoin without thinking about taxation on your side up to 600$ per transaction.
Here is an article of our beloved fortune
http://fortune.com/2017/09/07/cryptocurrency-bitcoin-taxThanks. Now I understand it a bit better, I think. To summarize: if you make a purchase with coins that have increased in value but the transaction is less than $600 you won't be taxed for capital gains. Sounds good. It's even more bitcoin-friendly than the similar German rule (€600 of "profit" per year there are tax-free, or you must hold the BTC for a year. But there the system is a bit different.).
I disagree with your view of $4950 likely be the end of a bubble. In My view bitcoin is not yet even in the bubble as we are still at the infancy stage of bitcoin and blockchain technology development. I do expect bitcoin to remain above $4000 for the remaining part of this year and I don't think we have any significant reason why bitcoin should go bearish except the games of media we are seeing playing from China to outrightly control bitcoin prices.
Well, even if we remained above $4000 but didn't cross $5000, we were technically in a bear market
But I also disagree that Bitcoin is so much in "its infancy". Bitcoin is already 8 years old. It's not ultra-mature still, but it's an internet technology, these are "growing up" faster than "real world" tech. Where was Facebook when it was 8? Or Google? OK, you could say "it's a protocol, not a company". But then let's compare it to "social networks" in general. They appeared in 1997 with SixDegrees. Eight years later MySpace was already a relatively well-known and mature player. So I would say that Bitcoin in 2017 is at a similar level than social networks were in 2004/05 approximately.
Don't understand me wrong: Bitcoin can still grow, and grow a lot. But I'm currently not seeing so much "real world" growth that justifies
300%+ in less than a year. (bold, because permabulls seem not to get the importance of that "little" fact).