This signature ad campaign is probably the best signature campaign that I am in. 0.0006 per post and the maximum post is 100. It's 50 for now but the usual maximum post count that they are paying is 100. 0.0006 x 100 = 0.06 BTC per week. Which mean 0.24 BTC per month. You can earn 1 BTC in ~4 months.
The rate of this signature ad campaign is twice the pay of YoBit. Not to mention it has a weekly payment and that means that you can miss a post for a day and just catch up on the next days.
many people keep thinking like that, signature campaign with really high maximum post but low payment rate is good, the total possible payment is the highest as calculation, seem legit.
but when they were asked, in the end they confess that they never reach that high post, in fact all they can do is just 10-20 posts per week, sometimes they go raging and push to 50, must be exhausted, i guess. you are spamming or you are damaging your brain.
wise choice is the opposite, choose signature campaign with low maximum post but high pay rate, you still get high payment in easy way. if you can post much more than their low maximum, you still can use another account, join other signature campaign with similar requirement.
example:
0.0006 x 100 = 0.06 btc/week
(0.001 x 30) x 2 = 0.06 btc/week
Well, that depends on you. If you can post 50 times a week then join a signature ad campaign that has high maximum posts, otherwise, choose the one with lesser maximum post but has higher rates (which is quite rare tbh). But since in psychology, what you think of other people = you, then I'll assume that you were the ones you are talking about who can only post 10-20 posts per week and if you wanted to get the 50 posts max, then you'll push your posts even if it's not constructive enough.
If you were talking about me, please kindly check my post history if I post spammy posts. Though there are some users here who seem to abuse low rate but high post max signature campaigns, I am not one of them.
You can find most of them in YoBit signature ad campaign.
