Third party trust are security holes. How do you know that the service didn't log anything that can be traced back to you? How do you know that it's not operated by bad actors?
cutting out middlemen and tumbling at the protocol level is obviously ideal, but we are in a transitional state where coinjoin liquidity is very poor. not only can wasabi wallet's high minimum and large anonymity set leave users waiting around to get their coinjoin done, but it's very obvious that these users are participating in a coinjoin together. in a world of increasingly strict risk-based AML/KYC policies, that may be problematic.
the ideal for coinjoins = much smaller, cascaded anonymity sets where observers can't tell coinjoins are taking place at all. unfortunately, not enough liquidity exists yet for this to be viable on a large scale. i'm hoping that implementation of schnorr signature aggregation will help incentivize more coinjoin liquidity on the network, but it could take years for this to come to fruition.
This is true, liquidity has been a problem with the more non-centralized way of doing things. Like BISQ, it's avoided, users prefer the centralized exchanges.
But what are we here for? What path should we take?
Sorry, but I missed a part where liquidity connects with mixing part of coins/tokens
Could you please describe a process? thx a lot in advance