However, it seems that until now there has been no resolution of this problem and it is still being debated because there are many different opinions from one gambler to another regarding KYC.
I understand that privacy and anonymity are very important and must be maintained, but if it is necessary and must be given, why should you mind giving it for the sake of smoothness and comfort when playing gambling.
I also appreciate that every gambler must have the right to something like that. But every casino also has its own rules and regulations and they must be obeyed and always applied by all users in it.
The solution for players who don't like KYC is to just look for casinos that don't require it, but every licensed casino will eventually make its users do KYC because it fulfills the regulations of the license where they are registered and sadly KYC will become commonplace and normal day by day and players who don't like that end up having no other choice.
But few and more difficult to trust a casino that doesn't enforce KYC requirements because of course the casino doesn't have a license, And it's true what you said that a licensed casino will definitely use a KYC and definitely they are more trustworthy and reliable than using non KYC casino.
It seems that it will also be like that because like it or not the name is mandatory and the provisions of the rules of a casino must be carried out and obeyed.
I definitely understand the concerns about entering personal information like that. Online, it's particularly crucial to be wary of who you share personal information with. You're correct that some casinos have more stringent know-your-customer regulations than others; before joining up, it's best to do some homework and read the fine print.
However, I do recognize the need of adhering to appropriate Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements and holding the appropriate license. It's a win-win situation: more safety for the casino and more compliance with the regulations from the players. So, I believe it boils down to striking a balance between security and trust when it comes to our personal data and the casino's operations.
There has been a lot of discussion and debate about KYC in other threads and there is a lot of debate about gamblers who don't want to do KYC or gamblers who really don't mind being asked for KYC as a condition on a gambling platform.
The concern of gamblers who refuse to provide a KYC on average is that they are afraid that their personal data will be misused by the casino.
But in fact there are several casinos that are trusted and can be relied on in terms of security, so we don't need to be afraid of giving out the personal data that we have.
Moreover, I also believe that in the future there will be more casinos that require their users to meet KYC requirements so we don't have to worry about the misuse of our personal data.
The main factor behind the rapid development of cryptocurrency casinos is that a gambler feels safe here because he can remain anonymous. Also, what you said is that most gamblers are concerned about the security of their transmitted personal data.
Usually information is leaked when a gambler conducts gambling on a fake platform. Generally all licensed based gambling platforms require KYC. I think there is no harm in doing KYC on a reputable casino platform. Because they are always concerned about the safety of gamblers.
Yes, and actually even though gamblers do and provide KYC they can still gamble anonymously because only the management team from the casino knows about their personal data from a KYC, so no other people or other gamblers will know their personal data.
But that's really what happened that every gambler is afraid of leaking their identity or personal data if they provide KYC.
I have also said several times that if the casino is trusted and has a good reputation, you can be sure there will be no abuse of the personal identity of the gamblers there.
