Topic: ❃❃ ▶▷ BETCOIN.ag ◁◀ ❃❃#Signature Campaign-High Pay, Monthly Bonus, Special Award - page 98. (Read 151885 times)

Personally I can live with that, but any changes in the rules during the ongoing period are always horrible practice. Please don't do it anymore.

If you need more flexibility, then just set the shorter periods (1 or 2 weeks), so betcoin can evaluate the performance at the end and make any changes effective from the next period.

Hello,

Decision was made to change the limits for minimum and maximum payable posts per month in Stage 1.

If anyone who already joined our campaign don't  accept those changes, we will understand and we are very sorry - but I hope everyone will understand and will still want to stay in Betcoin.ag Signature Campaign.


The reason is that we want to make sure our Participants will take care about their posts quality.

If the quality of posts created by our Participants will be very good, a limit for Stage 2 will be increased again to 200.


Best regards.

I am interested, please let me know.

Hi,

I would like to join this campaign. As you can see from my own sig, I've already been doing the campaign on my own for a while now and posting in the gambling section for my own affiliate referrals.  

If accepted, will I be able to add my affiliate attachment to the sig?

There's a reason it's called "untrusted feedback." In most cases it should not be taken seriously. Just read the description and check out who gave the -ive.
People tend to do "revenge rep" a lot, especially when you call out trolls and scammers.

There's a reason it's called "untrusted feedback." In most cases it should not be taken seriously. Just read the description and check out who gave the -ive.
People tend to do "revenge rep" a lot, especially when you call out trolls and scammers.

Thats a , no offense, stupid rule. Check my trust page, its spammed with trolls whom I gave negative trust. By your thinking trusted members on either DT, or highly trusted members aren't trusted enough to join this campaign? Anyone can easily make this rule obsolete by giving themselves positive feedback from their alts. Thats why you should accept only feedbacks from DT. And AFAIK Sarthak has a positive feedback from DT level 3.

Have a look at your untrusted feedback.

Dude, I already said that i am not seeing anything in all 4 depth and i see 1 +ve at depth 3. I asked you to PM me the scr shots because I literally cannot see any negative. Thank you.

Dude, I already said that i am not seeing anything in all 4 depth and i see 1 +ve at depth 3. I asked you to PM me the scr shots because I literally cannot see any negative. Thank you.

Hello,

I'm sure you can open your feedback page and read it on your own :-) You have 4 negative and 2 positive. Sorry. I understand that many times negative feedback is just a feedback from a troll.  I will not investigate every feedback. You have more negative than positive. Calculation is simple.

Best regards.

No problem. But make sure you PM me the screenshot of my red and the trust rating page (not for proof but because i want to know who put the neg)

Hello,
I rejected many people with neutral and positive trust rating.

Sorry but Sarthak is not able to join this campaign.

Best regards.

Thats a , no offense, stupid rule. Check my trust page, its spammed with trolls whom I gave negative trust. By your thinking trusted members on either DT, or highly trusted members aren't trusted enough to join this campaign? Anyone can easily make this rule obsolete by giving themselves positive feedback from their alts. Thats why you should accept only feedbacks from DT. And AFAIK Sarthak has a feedback from DT level 3.

I dont see any negative trust.. I've tried viewing in all 4 depths.

And if i was given a neg, it might have been given by;

1) User: 21coin
     Reason: He posted 'haha lol' in the first page of a guy who just started his service. And he hadn't even read the whole post because he was at the same time asking a question which was clearly answered in the FAQ in BOLD! When i told him that there was nothing funny to say 'haha lol' and your question is clearly answered in the OP and told him to stop spamming we had a debate. And you can check what his Personal message says:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/21coin-224515

2) User: I dont remember the user's name
     Reason: The user was running the Betcoin.tm sig campaign and i warned everyone on his thread that the site was a [scam] and I strongly believe that the user owned Betcoin.tm since Betcoin.tm is a chinese site and all his previous posts were in chinese. And when he left me a neg review, it read something like "Talks rubbish about my business" or something similar. Another neg left by a scammer.

3)  User: ubitcoin
      Reason: We were friend but we had some misunderstanding. Then this guy put a neg trust saying I'm rude and blah blah. I also left him a neg. Later the issue was resolved. I removed the neg but he never removed it and left the bitcoin scenario.

Thats all I have to say. Let me know if i am eligible or I will join some other campaigns.

Hey roslinpl, I have a serious question to ask.

Posts in this signature campaign or any other signature or avatar campaign counts or not ?

And also what about micro earnings board ?

A constructive post is one that inspires discussion or contributes to a current topic, and don't go off topic essentially. An example of being constructive is stating an opinion, describing why you formed that opinion, or even proposing a solution to your opinion .
Being non-constructive is along the lines of "This coin sucks" and "Dont invest, it's scam". These provide little discussion value and offer no logical formed opinion.