-cut-
According to how i understand binance listing to work, project are charged differently depending on their level of achievements and number of supporter/community backing the project, a project with really huge community stand a chance of getting their token listed on binance for free, I think shiba inu is a good example .
And also a project which really solves real life problems and have achieved a great deal in building out their technology could also stand a chance of getting listed on binance for free or for a very minimal fee.
-cut-
This might be the case. While i think that Befury could have a bright future, they would need to step up their game for listing to Binance. Because i can find few obvious reasons why BFG couldn't get listed.
1. Future or endgame of BFG tokenomics is vague at best. We know thy are burning it now, but i haven't seen them committed to anything in the future. This is what troubles me most in the token.
2. Support team is transparent but core team itself remains opaque for reasons i don't even want to speculate, but it increases the overall shadiness.
3. No legal team.
what to pursue so that you force yourself to be listed on binance, we know the binance exchange is the largest crypto exchange, instead of burning a lot of money for listing on binance, they can use the money for development, marketing and other alternatives from on forced circumstances
Well, I think they have analyzed being on Binance and listing, but I think it is not convenient for them because obviously, the market is very low and if they enter with a token the price will go much lower, I think they could enter Binance at the moment that they think is convenient and the most convenient time is when bitcoin begins its bullish trend and this is something very difficult to predict, meanwhile the interest in topkens is going down little by little, and many people do not believe much in the BFG token I have seen how many have sold their tokens, and they are not very interested, I think that if they want to save this they have to make very radical strategies.
^
Hard to get casino tokens listed on exchanges. There was a memorandum back in 2020 about it blockchain base games in which regulators need to add new rules because of the new technology underlying it. I was fairly watching one casino token where I have invested before which is the $HASH and a DEX had delisted them due to legal issues.
I haven't read anything like that, for that reason I didn't know that there is a law that prohibits exchanges from listing certain casino tokens, but I know that US laws are very strict in relation to tokens, exchanges, casinos, ICOs, DEFI and that's why reason many cryptocurrency exchanges and investments are not based in the US and put TOS prohibiting US citizens from investing, for example in the case of online casinos, I do not see any online casino saying that it has a US license and that US people can play freely, I only see online casinos having a license from curacao which has softer laws but now curacao wants to implement tougher laws for only online casinos
Curaçao to overhaul regime with new regulator, higher bars to entryIm from Germany and Betfury site is also telling me since few weeks that access is denied for my region (mirror sites too). I can login with vpn (interestingly with french ip adress). So I dont trust this thing anymore and withdrew all my funds.
Does someone know an easy way to delete a Betfury account? I looked around but didnt find a delete account option. I think a good site should have one.
If you don't like some things on the Betfury platform, it's easier to leave your empty account as it is and don't worry about it. Thus if you change your mind after a while and decide to come back, you won't need to register again because Betfury doesn't block inactive accounts. At the same time, if you still have a strong desire to remove your account, the only way to do so is to send an email from your registered email address to Betfury customer support. At least it's stated on the ToS
page.
I think the misbelieve or misconception of some gamblers is that deleting their account is also deleting their kyc documents from the casinos system or possession.
First, if a gambler operates an account that is not kyced, and at some point wishes not to continue with that account or the casino itself, just abandon the account, there is no need stressing the customer support with message requesting you account to be deleted.
Second, if gambler operates an account that is kyced and decides to stop using the account or the casino, asking the casino to close or delete your account does not mean they no longer has access to the documents you submitted for kyc verification, it is still with them and it is in their discretion to keep it or throw it away.
So it's obvious.
Of course, all the data of any person who has passed the KYC procedure remains in the databases of the casino or in general of any institution where you were required to verify the KYC procedure. Now this is so often required that almost anyone is already identified by KYC in many places on the network.
Moreover, I think that in general there is already a confidential exchange of information about specific people, even despite the prohibitions on the dissemination of personal data. Thus, personal data is "cleaned". And that's it - you already know exactly who he is and where, on which site something was hidden or incorrectly and deliberately written.
Alas, we are all already "under the hood" of "Big Brother"
this issue of where our data is kept and whether it is safe or not is a question that has kept anyone up at night, the truth is that no one is comfortable giving their data to someone anonymous, remembering that your proof of residence has it your home address, so that makes it easier for scammers besides you to steal money at the casino he can also get to your house and steal and kill you, that's because if the scammers see that you are a big whale in his casino so he already knows that in the real world you have a lot of money. are things that scare
Sometimes it is counterproductive because the USA is supposed to have much more freedom, but I think that in the same regulations that they put in context it limits a lot, I have a friend in the USA who only uses stake.us and he is delighted, but still he You want to try other casinos and you can't, so what I think is the following, too much freedom is actually a limitation? So it is safe to have so many protection mechanisms for users or else it becomes a double-edged sword. In the end, I don't know which will be better if it is to be in that protection or limit it to the fun mode, of course everything changes when they are physical casinos.