Topic: 🎲BetFury.io|​​​💫 Stellar network & XLM 💫|📈BFG farming on BabySwap - page 55. (Read 84931 times)

I have used many casino sites some of which I can't access normally but I have accessed them through VPN but never faced any problem but for Betfurry I never used VPN as it is smooth access for my country without VPN. So I don't have much experience whether accessing this site using vpn will have any problem and is it vpn friendly.

Guys, I am currently playing some slot games on BetFury in order to see if I could meet up with a wager requirement of a bonus I just claimed from btcgosu some few hours ago, but I currently lack ideas on which slot game to play to better my chances of completing the wager requirement which is about $750, and also coming out with some profit at the end of it all.

Though there is a limited number of slot games the system allows me to play since i am playing from my bonus account, I still will or would very much appreciate suggestions on which slot games to choose, and what provider is best, currently, I've been playing only games from pragmatic, share with me some slot games with low house edge if you any.

Thanks very much in anticipation.

One of the things that changed over the years is that they acquired a license. From that moment on, a lot of countries were on the restricted list but as you mention, they allow the use of a VPN to keep using their website.

Before using this maybe people should ask about the support about this so they will have clarification regarding the usage of VPN. But if you are in restricted country then its really better not to use vpn just to access the casino since its really  risky to gamble especially if they ask a KYC to them and they can't pass because they are residing in restricted country so this will be a huge trouble in their part. If we are fine and not listed on the restricted country then I think from that we are fine to use VPN since we don't have any conflict to go thru since we are playing legally on allowed country.

VPN might be legal to them but people should ask about more details about this, Its hard to commit mistake so we need to make sure that we are totally fine.

Indeed it easy to ask, as consultation is always free. But the way casinos answer, it is usually a very general information like "according to our rules" and a copy-pasted clause from ToS or "it isnt allowed and use it at own risk". Often support answer like there is not much of an answer to a question.

I think the point is that, as long as a gambling casino allows their users to make use of vpn for what ever purpose, trust that alot of users will abuse that privilege.
I have never played on BetFury before using a vpn, whether for privacy of whatever, and neither did I even know that it was safe to use vpn on the site aside the fact I am just learning about it here.

But all same, I personally would believe that if using VPN on BetFury is legal, then, there are probably a lot of customers from restricted areas or region who would be using it to access the casino, this is a basic fact.

The easy thing is to ask their service support or other support team about using a VPN, after all, sometimes people often experience this because they are lazy to ask about the terms of using VPN on the site, each casino site always has different requirements and regulations, so don't be shy. to ask so that it doesn't become a new problem for anyone.

It's true that there are cases of accounts being frozen and withdrawals being held due to VPN use, but that's only on some casino sites because not all casinos prohibit it, I personally don't know Betfury's terms and regulations but there's no harm in asking anyone in this thread or support service on their site about VPN use. because there are some countries that may prohibit gambling and cannot access gambling, so you have to use a VPN.

This is incorrect interpretation on why Betfury allow VPN. VPN is use for privacy purposes but that doesn’t mean you are allowed to use to bypass the country restriction to play in the casino. There are many users that use VPN regularly when playing in the casino and other website for privacy. I believe that’s the reason why Betfury allow VPN usage and not to bypass restrictions because they are committing a violation against their license if they allow players from restricted country to play.

I find it strange that some rules contradict other rules. Some countries are restricted to use sports betting, while are allowed to gamble in casino, and to use NFT loot boxes now. I dont understand logic of that, because you are not allowed and both allowed to gamble. Consequences from loosing are the same, people get same gambling addiction.

Using VPN while it isnt allowed is tricky. They allow to lose and win money, but in a different scenario, usage of VPN can cause withdrawal problems (they can lock account after a big win for example). I dont think this is fair.

This is the reason why people got discourage about them since it seems that they didn't been heard by management and continue suffering from current status of their token. If BFG know how to settle some emotions and do more better job regarding on developing other important things that can help their token for sure many people will not get disappointed on their performance. But they remain silent despite of so many doubts and negative discussion that's why to many investors are not got dismayed about them.

We might don't know what is there plan for future but for sure many of those old holders got enough on what they are seeing at the moment. To many speculations and other discussions related to their token rise up here so I guess the negative discussion will continue unless they do something to help it and also the people holding those tokens.

Yeah, Betfury has a huge list of restricted jurisdictions in its rules. I think that when the Betfury developers only had the idea of creating the project and only launched it, it is unlikely that they could have foreseen all the nuances and consequences. However, the fact that Betfury still allows its users to use VPNs indicates that they are only formally restricting access for users from banned jurisdictions.

Yeah, marketing trough bitcointalk was a good idea. Imho whole token was ingenious way to unite crypto investors and gamblers both wanting to invest into passive income. Both generating volume, because they were interested about the future of the token.

But among some other things they messed up was the plan. As their end game didn't seem to make any sense from the beginning. Casino was generating volume by people grinding and mining the token, but there was no clear plan what would happen next. Circulating supply kept rising and dividends decreasing. Mining for tokens didn't make any sense any more. And i am pretty sure they didn't even bother to check where in the world this centalized dividend distrubution from profits would be even legal, because betury ended up serving only handful of countries.

They had lots of promise and i ignored lots of red flags because of it.

Well along this path of learning about casinos and everything they can do to Improve, I Have never seen leaving bitcointalk traffic be the best option , yes for non-crypto Casinos , fiat casinos Don't matter , because it is something that they have a level of Competition at other levels that are not those of those in Crypto , but to give a boost to a forum that is Satoshi's, where there are very large investors, where they will leave anything for a token They are doing it very well, I think it is not the right way, there is an old saying that they say where I saw it is:  "He who covers a lot, squeezes little" eventually if they got involved with tokens and a market like crypto, Well, they had to have some awareness of what they were getting into, not because of them with the token , but to have the necessary tact Because there were Investors who were there with them Buying their tokens, trusting in what they should be , whether they were Right or Wrong in their situation  casino , that Was not the Correct behavior.

First of all, I have to have a very futuristic vision, if at this Moment I don't have a casino in which I did all that, I am not exempt from doing things well and having everything collapse again, and when I want to emerge, who do I need? ? To the clients, to the players, to the audience, and to everything in the community possible, if they come to Bitcointalk again to do things better, to build on what they did, do you think they will have the highest level of trust that they had in them? No, because obviously how are you going to give it an opportunity when they let a token that looked very promising leave it alone in decentralized exchanges, and not worry about Raising the price or holding contests, or so many things, the advantage they have as a casino is that people trust more than any project they get from an alt, and that is Something that disappoints, for the Investors and players who Believed in the beginning.

This isn't grammar class and I don't think anyone finds it difficult to read and understand it, but if you do, then please feel free to use the ignore button. Cheers!


High rollers who don't want to see their names seen on the leaderboard or simply don't feel comfortable using the same account after wagering a certain amount but it all applies to no KYC, no bonus casinos which are very rare now since most crypto casinos implemented mandatory KYC for accessing withdrawal button.

Yes, it's true if we gamble every day but we can still control ourselves and that can't be completely called an addict but can be called a gambler, but there are also gamblers who play all the time but they can't control themselves so gambling without limits is definitely called an addict and already addicted, because normal gambling is knowing when to gamble and when to stop gambling.

What really causes addiction is usually because you are obsessed with looking for a source of income and wealth in gambling so the behavior is like being greedy so usually because greedy behavior will cause addiction, it is true that every gambler is always different depending on how they use their mindset when gambling and the most correct thing is gambling. wisely consider gambling only as entertainment. 

I think you have a mistake while quoting post. Those sentences belong to leonair post.

Anyway, how come multiple accounts improve privacy? I think they do opposite, they decrease it. The more you are presented somewhere, the more chances that you will make a mistake.

I find it reasonable to have wagering requirement for bonuses. Even high wagering requirement is ok for me. Casinos are not charity organizations. They dont suppose to give free money every single user. As well as nobody forces no one to collect bonus and bother with wager.

Man, learn to use punctuations in your posts when and where necessary, without this, reading and understanding properly; your post is kind of difficult.

And anyways, I believe bakasabo wasn't saying anything about any casino lifting their wager requirement.
As long or far as I understand, wager requirement is a criteria that comes with bonuses, as a way to prevent or keep gambler discouraged from abusing the bonus, but then, some casino still have a wager requirements on deposited funds, where as, the gambler is required to wager a certain amount of money he or she deposited before he or she can withdraw, this I believe some casinos do to prevent gamblers from using the casino as a means to launder money, I might be wrong though.

I don't remember any casino lifting their wagering requirements if they are willing to accept they won't ever want to claim any bonus and rewards but there are casinos that don't have bonuses at all that even has wagering requirements and its inevitable due to the AML policies so these no claim bonus can help for someone who needs to have multiple accounts for privacy reasons.

bet who?

Flexible staking has tiered APRs that depend on how many tokens a user has staked. For example, if you decide to stake from 0 to 250 usdt, the APR will be 30%. However, if you stake from 251 to 1000 usdt, the APR will be 20%, i.e. the more usdt you have staked, the lower the APR will be, down to 10%. So, there is most likely not a typo but a marketing ploy to attract more users' attention.