I'm really wondering now what's the reason he opened that thread ? I mean the site is done and bitcointalk doesn't trust him anyways so what's the point ?
currently I really don't understand the situation at all cause I never expected him to show up here , does this thing have anything to do with legal stuffs or is there actually a chance that he is willing to pay these lost funds ?
totally agree with you about the newbie accounts tho it's totally shady and most likely fake as well , but what's the point of these positives vouches
Thank you for the excellent question. Others have wondered the same thing. Using newbie accounts to post how happy there are that they lost their funds and appreciate all that "
deano" is doing and thanking him shows exactly what a low-life he he is. As for the funds, well he stole the final 50+ BTC from investors worth over $400,000 so yes he could pay them back. I mean, which kind of imbecile loads $400,000+ from a cold-wallet on to a hot-wallet just in time for it to allegedly get stolen but not even report it to the Police? The only reason for not reporting it to the Police is......?
As far as serial scammer Dean Nolan opening a thread over a month after he closed the website while making it clear he intended to return all funds to all investors (including threats to delay payment if they intend to report him to the Police or try to take legal action against him). He also mentioned he started a new business or was about to start one. I simply put it down to a classic case of misdirection.
It is well known that scammers, thieves and compulsive liars would constantly say things intended to cloud the judgement of interested parties. In this case, serial scammer Dean Nolan is using the forum here to posting for the sake of showing he is
trying to repay investors. With that information available in a public forum, anybody thinking of taking him to court in a civil litigation action or reporting him to Police would have to consider the merit of that lie (about him
trying to repay the funds to victims). This is classic misdirection.
Consider the alternative, if serial scammer Dean Nolan posted that he did indeed steal the 50+ BTC in October 2019 and blamed it on an imaginary hack and if he also admitted to stealing around a minimum of $3.25 million from the 2017 betking ICO including a minimum of those 30 million BKB tokens and if he admitted he scammed the winners of the 2018 Christmas wager out of 20+ BTC and if he admitted he destroyed any chance of betking being successful when in breach of the ICO promise he deliberately emptied the bankroll funds to use on the buy-back guarantee knowing that he could use it to cash in the stolen 30 million BKB - then what would be the outcome? He would be open to a criminal investigation.
Right now, serial scammer Dean Nolan has only ever posted in this forum when it suited his own needs. The small community of casino who had skype chats and were on friendly terms with each other have excluded this thief. Nobody wants anything to do with him. He only came here trying to spout the same trash that he thinks will extend his time before an inevitable criminal investigation begins. Not all businesses have the person entrusted to run them steal a minimum of over $3 million from it and bankrupt it including topping up the contents of a cold-wallet on to a hot-wallet just before it allegedly got hacked:
~snip~
Many businesses fail every day. Don't invest what you can't afford to lose.