Topic: BetKing.io is a blatant scam operated by Dean Nolan - page 24. (Read 31362 times)

Well I bought some tokens when they were 90$ per 1 million and I sold some today at 10 sats!

It's so sad to see I was right all along about Dean.
Even reading through my replies that were quoted here makes me angry.
0.5BTC I have invested in the project is worth a total of 160$.

People like him make me want to become a vigilante.

There might be similarities but I see no real evidence or matter of substance to connect the two site.

Communicate with mentally ill blatant liars is usually a waste of time, but here we go:

1) They did not gave any proof in regard to key elements of their investment fraud scheme!

2) I did not email Curacao


There are some similarities:

- Lies are coming out when mouth opened

- Same bad offer of games

- Investors receive fantasy tokens

- Fantasy token holders participate in the profit of the casino

- Problem with listing the fantasy token on exchanges. As soon as listed, value will crash!

- Signature spammers paid with fantasy tokens

Since the scammer is identified, are we seeing him answering the court? Its been 2 years if someone filed a case verdict could have been read.


Come on. You have been spawn their thread with your investigation, they gave you proof but you are not listening to them. You did email Curacao yourself about license.
I see no connection of Dean Nolan to this Betking, EOSbet is entirely new and were not doing ICO to begin with.

I looked at that site, I saw nothing that made me think it was operated by serial scammer Dean Nolan

Maybe investment scam artist Dean Nolan is behind the new EOSBet BET fantasy token investment scam?

EOSBet.io - Licensed Casino Platform 🎲Provably Fair 🎲NOW ACCEPTING BTC ₿

Yes the comment serial scammer Dean Nolan made about giving "free" tokens was another one of many that were quite off the mark.

Like you I agree that bounty participants do not receive free tokens, they "earn" them because they work. Bounty participants receive payment for work, they are effectively being employed by project owners therefore there is no scope for "free" coins or tokens being given, there is just a business transaction between two parties.

As far as your comment about serial scammer Dean Nolan being an incompetent business owner is concerned, I agree but only within context.

In the end, he has to be an incompetent business owner overseeing the demise of this once likeable website and after he tried to sell betking several times and failed, then tried to shut it down and convert betking tokens to his next scam ("bitsafe" exchange) but could not raise funds in the "bitsafe" ICO therefore shelved that idea. Now he used EOS tokens that for airdrops to try to pull in 200,000 new customers but he barely dragged in a handful if that and when he miscalculated the 2018 Christmas wager odds and watched as 20 BTC +EV was to be paid out so he cited an imaginary "hack" and "cheating" because he refused to pay legitimately won winnings so yes as a business owner he is incompetent... but as a shrewd opportunistic individual he definitely is not incompetent because he is a successful serial scammer.

He made millions in BTC by siphoning-off funds from the 2017 ICO by not even using the funds as they were supposed to be used. When I stated a few weeks ago the bankroll at betking was around 19-20 BTC he put his own money (that he siphoned-off from the 2017 ICO) to top it up to around 50 BTC just to fool investors and potential investors by saying they were invested by investors (hiding the fact he did it to try to make the site look respectable).

There was nothing ever stated in the betking terms and conditions of the 2017 ICO that allowed bankroll funds to be used to buy back BKB tokens but serial scammer Dean Nolan did it because he wanted to cash in his own personal holdings that already siphoned-off and decided to make it look as though he was doing it for the investors when he really did it for himself. It was not necessary to do it but he did it and to make matters worse he used the bankroll funds rather than the funds that were to be kept for "marketing, promotions, SEO, design development, server costs and legal". He needed to keep those used for "marketing, promotions, SEO, design development, server costs and legal" funds in place to continue to use as his personal milking cow. So the fact he made a choice between the two to line his own pockets (at least twice on a large scale and numerous times on smaller scales) shows he is a serial scammer.

When serial scammer Dean Nolan switched over to EOS BKT tokens he created 10 billion EOS BKT tokens but for some reason decided after the disaster that brought upon betking by nearly shutting it down and calling it a day, he was somehow worthy of keeping 10% (that is 1 billion) of the EOS BKT tokens for himself. As for him saying bounty participants receiving free tokens, here is a great analogy: So every time serial scammer Dean Nolan tries to "fix" the betking website after bringing it to his knees he decides to keep billions of "FREE" tokens for himself, tokens he did not earn and did not deserve.

The list of his scams goes on....

None of the above sounds like incompetent business owner to me, they sound very much like serial scammer to me.

players didn't lose money except in the cancelled promotion where technically they were promised to get more coins


wrong , Betking barely having 15 users these days and not all of them are real players

your statements clearly show that you don't even visit the site , so go spam somewhere else

to be honest at this stage I don't know what the discussion can bring since damage was already done

I am so confused anytime I get here, first I read the dean's response in the chat that jollygood shared and I haven't researched the topic that deeply so I thought "well he had an ICO and it went south and people were mad after they invested and it went down but that does happen with some ICO's" and was feeling like dean wasn't a scammer but just a incompetent business owner (which I still think he is after all). However then I read that he switched up the ICO to whatever pleases him and he made profit with it while losses were on the investors.

Calling bounty earnings "free" is also quite dishonest considering they work for you to make that money, its not for free its literally your payment for work done, I do not give money to my boss to give me money later, I work for my boss and he pays me, same idea with every single salary earner in the world.

I was seeing this ICO closely initially this guy abandoned bounty hunters . In that time there was not much greedy bounty hunters even very less everybody were trying to promote this project he ditched . Then he failed to show revenue model . He couldn't able to pay  Devidends for investors.

Typing those words are really hard even on a casual search for any other service/gambling sites/trading sites out there.

Seems like their crash game do have lots of players. lol

That's just it many of this site can be so friendly and confusing when reading about them and most actually attract users through their earning points but, as a player you need to do enough research before using any betting site like for example, get a look at the reviews made about them.

It was the only wager that comes to mind when he scammed winners. In the end he scammed winners out of 20 BTC +EV during the Christmas wager content but then claimed he was a great guy because he returned bets placed to those that placed bets.

The other one he cancelled without notification was when he advertised the 50 BTC dice game to celebrate the post-ICO relaunch of the betking website - that was all drama just to entice users to the site but he had no intention of ever letting anybody win 50 BTC.

Not sure now when exactly that wager competition happened coz I already moved on about it and never checked the site after that. I remember I even tried to sent him a PM that is it not a good idead to just cancel a competition like that where everyone wasted time and money just for the position they are in

Are you referring to the 2018 Christmas wager where he refused to payout over 20 BTC +EV?

It was when he was citing "cheating" and said the site was "hacked" but never provided any evidence before he admitted in reality he miscalculated the odds and prizes so refused to pay winners?

I was one of the users who decided to get away before disaster. No matter how much people say it is a scam, I don't understand why they still have many users on the site by the fact that they are still operating.

Yes and I am a victim on one of those contests. I remember it was a wager contest and it was cancelled 1 day before it ends where I am at 4th or 5th place.

It is not too difficult to put "betking scam" into google.

It is the gullible investors and newbies that visit betking that I feel sorry for because they know little or nothing of the shady past betking has.

There is nothing stopping serial scammer Dean Nolan from scamming others winners of other games and contests in future. Look at the scammer, he is using the Bustabit crash code without paying the 2 BTC licence fee.

betking and its owner operator serial scammer Dean Nolan are definitely not trustworthy at all.