I sell license for it for 2 bitcoin, but for people who don't want to (or can't) pay I offer the code completely free as (I like to hope) the code is useful for other people to see how a bitcoin casino is built and learn from it. The condition though for those people, is the AGPLv3 license which basically says that you must prominently link to the code/license and any changes must also be under the same license as well as pretty much everything that touches it (so generally the front-end/backend) along with instructions for anyone who wants to install/build their own. People are totally free to use it for commercial purpose, but any interfacing code must also be made available under the AGPLv3 too. (The AGPLv3 is basically the GPL license, but it closes some loopholes around not need to comply with the license if you're offering it as as service (e.g. Remote Network Interaction))
I know there's a few people who have expressed interests in building bustabit for ETH, so I think the adaptations made for ETC and stuff would be pretty appreciated. (And likewise those people would have to share any changes they make, so hopefully it's a bit of a win win for everyone)
Ah, I see. So BB, who have made nearly 500BTC in profit, decided to use the free code instead of paying you 2BTC to license it. Interesting.
Sadly it was purchased, I guess not that interesting or drama worthy anymore.
Well that's good. It was pretty clear that Ryan was under the impression that it wasn't purchased so I'm glad everything got resolved.
I'm glad you're glad :-)
I'm someone who has 25+ years of open-source collaborative history ... I tend to stick to license terms ...