The test on what to be with FRC will be what happens afterwards. I am not particulary fond of it because of the 80% premine which still gonna be 40% after 15 years.
Are you sure about that? I thought the 80% coins (80M) for the Foundation was fully funded in the first 3 coin-years, not over the whole distribution lifetime.
Checking on IRC...
Well again, that it is supposed to be distributed changes nothing. They could spent all the premine as "bounties" within a month and it will still be essentially cronie capitalism.
The premine is totally unnecessary. We demonstrated proposals where the entirety of the currency could be distributed in a decentalized manner within weeks, but they not gonna do it.
People always have to learn it the hard way, why be honest when you could rip somebody off?
I'm not sure what point you think I was trying to make, I was just pointing out the egregious factual error that you were spreading. Agree or disagree, the coins have to get out there somehow, and it seems that there was more than enough weight against "just another miner coin" (pun intended) distribution model.
[16:31]
[16:31]
[16:32]
So after about 3 years the foundation has all the FRC it's ever going to get from the direct subsidy. If you want to keep it honest I'm sure that the foundation could use a volunteer watchdog to police actual execution to plan on grants, but it sounds like you have already passed judgement.
To my knowledge nobody has ever really tried to build a functional non-profit to handle a grant proposal/review model to distribute coins.
They have a high bar to get over, but personally I don't think it's hopeless. It's certainly going to be worth a bucket of popcoin!