I'm not going to read 10 pages of BFL bashing, but I will chime in.
Most if not all the posts are like yours minus the happy results of RMA. Where it gets messy is when others troll. Specifically slok, inaba and bcp19 instigate off topic posts and pretty much all of their replies are ad hominem attacks and nothing to do with the product failures and under performance and I would recommend anyone actually reading through the thread to just skip over those even though they were reported they have not been removed by the mods although a few have been a lot remain cluttering up the thread. Or simply click IGNORE for those 3 and the thread cleans up very nicely as would 100's of other threads funnily enough.
You might want to review the on topic posts as a BFL customer as it is worth a look through about the failures, under performance and the lack of prompt email response from BFL time and time again. Hopefully most of the posts are on topic and not BFL bashing but rather providing more than enough evidence to prove that there is something beyond random chance happening with these failures or in other words statistically significant.
Just had to quote this for posterity (especially since Bick loves to delete and rewrite posts instead of editing them).
1) There's almost 200 posts in this thread, if ALL of them were true complaints that'd be .5% of the 40,000+ units BFL has shipped. You claim this .5% is statistically significant.
2) You call my replies ad honinem attacks, yet you call your own attacks a service to the community. You are biased and not looking for anything positive as your thread title states.
3) "Hopefully most posts are on-topic and not BFL bashing" This entire thread is BFL bashing starting with the title.
I personally own 5 BFL products, 4 Jalapenos and a Little Single and all are using the PSUs supplied by BFL. The LS and 1 Jalapeno have been running non-stop since early September, the others were acquired in Oct/Nov. Of these 5 units, 3 are running +/- 1%, one is running +20% and one is running +50% of the speed they were advertised to run at. One of your attack posts lists how a person paid for(and received) a 7GH upgrade yet they know people with 5GH orders that received 7GH and he was upset at having paid for an upgrade he received, yet you copied and posted it as a failure/underperformance. How is +40% speed a failure or underperformance?
Many people on this forum fall into the DIY crowd and many have tried to eek out more performance by altering their units. Can you in good faith respond to this and tell me that NONE of these 'complaints' you have copied and pasted into your bashing thread were caused by customer intervention? Interestingly enough, BFL actually seems to be one of the few(if not the ONLY) ASIC companies that will RMA a device even if the customer did somethign stupid and bricked it. On one visit I made to BFL I saw about 5-7 RMAs they had gotten in and several of them it was apparent someone took them apart and couldn't get them back together. The person who performs the burn-in on products even told me that he'd tested several that had been sent in and once put back together properly ran at speed and temperature.
Sadly, Bick, you will never know what it is like to have to deal with the issues of having produced over 40,000 units for customers, so you are unable to truly understand what "statistically significant" truly is. Sure, you can copy and paste from a dictionary, any monkey can do the same, but to truly understand... THAT takes something more.