It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Purchased a 5GH/s miner in August, received it in November. Miner hashed at 1.5GH/s.
Requested an RMA to replace the miner. RMA was accepted. I shipped it back, received a
package 1 week later. No miner, just a power supply. So now I have a power supply for a
$300 miner, still can't mine.
Some bullshit man.
edit: Yes, I was aware of the many terrible experiences people have had with them, and even
the theory that they mine with the machines themselves before sending them out, at the time
of my purchase. I made the purchase with money to blow, even in the event that by the time
I had expected to receive the miner (april 2014) it would be unprofitable, I wouldn't feel that
bad. I'm just complaining here because of how absurd this service is. Blows my mind.
This 6.02GH/s is reached in 10% of the time. The other 90% of the time it wants to hash at 5.7GH/s.
The +/-10% of the advertised 7GH/s requires that the device hash at least 6.3GH/s.
TL;DR Josh STFU
They've pre-sold more then 60,000 monarchs which have missed their power targets by about 70%
and the bullet run is expected to now be late march.
Quote
"some units might hit 350W, but most will be 500W or more, expect high end to be 600W"
"which means we may revise the estimate to 350W for the 300GH version, 600GH version being 600W"
Apparently they're also now having thermal expansion detach bumps (like Nvidia in 2008).
In the meantime, their RMA queue is huge (with the RMA email address refusing emails) with the amount
of people who's devices have engines which have just died. And that's if you're lucky. If you're unlucky,
the PSU blew which has then fried the device.
I know there are people from November who are still waiting for a reply to their RMA requests.
It could be potentially earlier...
This 6.02GH/s is reached in 10% of the time. The other 90% of the time it wants to hash at 5.7GH/s.
The +/-10% of the advertised 7GH/s requires that the device hash at least 6.3GH/s.
TL;DR Josh STFU
They've pre-sold more then 60,000 monarchs which have missed their power targets by about 70%
and the bullet run is expected to now be late march.
Quote
"some units might hit 350W, but most will be 500W or more, expect high end to be 600W"
"which means we may revise the estimate to 350W for the 300GH version, 600GH version being 600W"
Apparently they're also now having thermal expansion detach bumps (like Nvidia in 2008).
In the meantime, their RMA queue is huge (with the RMA email address refusing emails) with the amount
of people who's devices have engines which have just died. And that's if you're lucky. If you're unlucky,
the PSU blew which has then fried the device.
I know there are people from November who are still waiting for a reply to their RMA requests.
It could be potentially earlier...