Topic: BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes) - page 680. (Read 243376 times)

Personally, I think we should first get the wallet/miner/sanctuary to a good and stable place and only then go after another exchange. New coins can get away with wallet updates on a regular basis but once you add a bunch of exchanges you are limited to a few a year if that.

second this

I still think it is worth the investment. It will push bbp to next level. Yobit is listed 52 exchange of world with 50m traded daily

my miners again disappeared  
jeebem na to 

ROB can you fix it finally?



thx

no need to upgrade

187 is out

Update on YoBit.net exchange ...

I've read dozens of reviews and btc-talk forum posts about YoBit, and like most exchanges there are plenty of complaints. The majority have to do with support issues, such as slow or no reply to support tickets.

It can sometimes take 2 or 3 days to get a response. Confirmations are slow, withdrawals sometimes take 6 hours or longer, and there is a lot of down-time due to maintenance. Most of the complaints are the result of poor performance issues common to many exchanges. I don't see any solid evidence of dishonesty or actual scam behavior.

As you know, crypto-currency exchanges are usually un-regulated, and certainly their industry is no where near having standards that apply to stock trading exchanges in the US. Any appraisal has to be given within the context of the competition. Despite the negative comments, I'd give YoBit a rating of 5 on a scale of 10.

As shown earlier, a listing on YoBit costs approx $1,200 USD and they say a new coin can be ready for trading within a week of the payment. I know that getting a reliable exchange(s) on board is a top priority for BBP. Since discussions and/or negotiations are already underway with several exchanges, I suggest we wait a few days to see which of the offers/deals turn out to be the best.

No, not the case.

First thing you need to do is run solo for an hour on each of the two machines and post the wallets HPS, and be descriptive about what you tested and label the value something descriptive, like "procname, location, threads, core-wallet HPS".  Then let us see how that compares to the other "exact" proc before talking about the pool layer.


Also take into account the HPS2 is generated over time.

Mine too..Low hps2
I also dropped Quite a lot on the leaderboard.
And As a result my shares are lower

Do where I was in top 10 I am no at 20 or so.

And there is a big differenws between my miners although hardware is rhe Same.
One has hps of 1500 other 13000 which was the lowesr before the update.

So there is some flakyness at least. If All would be at the samelevel then there wouldnt be a problem.
But as there is difference between the Same hardware it most likely is a big or something somewheew Right?

Hps2 is relative
Mined loads of coins last hour though that's important

Not worth mining atm.

which exchanges wants coin when its nonstop updating?  


confirmed too
my miners got very low HPS2   and no all is online

confirmed, same here

all miner got very low share and HPS2 ? and can not report all miner online

Wow, it has been active on here!  I'm about 2 weeks behind with the thread, but have 40 pages to read! :-p

Okay rob, I understand, however listing on more exchanges could benefit the coin, as for me I have to liquidate some funds in order to pay my datacenter bill which is due the 7th february 499e.
I might pay it out of my pocket but I need to think about it, I'll decide coming week because we need functional exchange to expand our userbase.

best wishes

"At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit, said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this is what you were pleased to do!" - Luke 10:21

We thank you Father, Lord of the universe and all that exists, for blessing this project, for being generous to us and guiding us to be generous to others. Please continue to bless the children, and bring our attention to things that are truly important. In Jesus's Holy name we pray ... Amen.

Like I said I have no problem with the pool or minor issues/downtime occurring along the way. I am about to deploy 24 miners and maybe some cloud miners for pool. But it is always better to have multiple options though no? On Reddit it says help out/work to do "2nd pool".

I'm not sure who was the target of the answer, or if i understand the position of everybody right, so here are only my thoughts:
My interest in offering an alternative to the current pool (software) comes from the requests heard over the last month (it is a todo in reddit, too). While I'm not really sure what the personal reasons for these requests are in detail, it sounded like a reasonable request to have more pools available, as the coin grows. That started my interest here.

Now we could use the current pool software for more pools, but there are points that might have stopped others from using it already:
- It is windows only, which excludes the large group of linux/unix admins (my personal reason)
- It contain a lot of additional features, that a second pool doesn't need, or even shouldn't have (only the main pool should have the orphan letters)
- Some might be put off my other factors, like a personal distaste of the UI system (mixed bag for me. For me, it is to JS heavy. But it works)

For me, the current short downtime have no meaning in all of this, as I started looking into the topic shortly before I wrote the "Idea for two proposals" topic in the Forum (http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=79.0) 10 days ago. I do not want to replace the current pool, or anything like that, for me it is only an additional option for biblepay, that might help in making it more attractive to more people.

It is clear that another pool software will need a lot of special code. My plan at the moment is writing a bridge that requires NO changes on the client, only on the server side. To understand the required code for that, I'm digging deep into the current pool software and other external pool software.
Indeed, that will require do understand the current pool better, but I hope that I will be allowed to asked some stupid questions in the process, as I really do not want to "bring the current pool down" or anything

Hope that made it a little bit more clear, and there is no bad blood about that topic, as I do not want to create any discrepancies with my work here.

No, this is just going to be so I can push it to 5 or so boxes and watch the hash base.  Ill explain it after I see that it works, and you can post yours for diagnostic purposes, but its not ready yet.