Thank you for all your hard work Rob. I don't mind the occasional bump in the road. Is a P2Pool possible with biblepay?
Why do you ask about p2pool, is the pool not good enough? If its not good enough, what is the problem with it?
Topic: BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes) - page 681. (Read 243386 times)
January 24, 2018, 10:37:41 AM
January 24, 2018, 10:36:26 AM
On other hand, C-CEX looks like it is going to pull a bitconnect.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418700.2860
Not faith in this exchange anymore.
PLEASE people can we find an exchange to list us? I suggested yobit and pool for the 0.1btc fee!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418700.2860
Not faith in this exchange anymore.
PLEASE people can we find an exchange to list us? I suggested yobit and pool for the 0.1btc fee!
I think we should give them 30 more days, give them benefit of the doubt.
I think he must be back in the office because 7 days ago, bitcoin withdrawals were blocked, now BTC withdrawals opened (I pulled the compassion.com funds out a few days ago).
The issue where support banned the XVG user for being rude, the thing is CCEX has a few volunteers manning the troll box and they have the power to do that, so its not necessarily CCEX trying to squelch anyone.
As far as BBP goes, I could not create a ticket to bring us back online because the ticket queue is FULL right now (and could not during vacation, because it was DISABLED then), LOL. So that leads me to believe the backlog is still High.
I added a few messages to skype this morning to bring us back up. I think when he reads them he will get to us in due time, we are such a small fish.
Why would he want to kill his cash cow now, after finally getting out of debt. I understand people who are not God Fearing would just steal the entire exchange funds, but I have not gotten that impression when talking to Yuri, he actually seemed to care about the users after the initial break in a couple years ago.
January 24, 2018, 10:31:14 AM
On other hand, C-CEX looks like it is going to pull a bitconnect.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418700.2860
Not faith in this exchange anymore.
PLEASE people can we find an exchange to list us? I suggested yobit and pool for the 0.1btc fee!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418700.2860
Not faith in this exchange anymore.
PLEASE people can we find an exchange to list us? I suggested yobit and pool for the 0.1btc fee!
I just withdrew litecoin from c-cex easily no reason to have coin on there unless biblepay is out of maintenance mode. I happened to withdraw from coinsmarkets HOURS before they went down very lucky.
January 24, 2018, 10:29:13 AM
Thank you for all your hard work Rob. I don't mind the occasional bump in the road. Is a P2Pool possible with biblepay?
January 24, 2018, 10:24:07 AM
To everyone talking about NOMP, if NOMP was possible I would have written the original pool in NOMP.
There are massive things missing. One there is no hash function in python that is going to get you the biblehash.
Two, there is no software (like cgminer or sgminer) that is going to interact with NOMP.
If you think I did that bad of a job with the pool, I think you should find another community.
Ill fix the pool software if its not working properly, as it has historically worked with over 98% uptime and I kept it maintained, and after 1/2 day of being behind you are talking about porting it to NOMP. Shameful.
Anyway, do whatever you want, its not going to work and Im not going to help code pieces of the core client to work with it, as the pool does a lot more than you think it does. It is also a hub for adding orphan features.
There are massive things missing. One there is no hash function in python that is going to get you the biblehash.
Two, there is no software (like cgminer or sgminer) that is going to interact with NOMP.
If you think I did that bad of a job with the pool, I think you should find another community.
Ill fix the pool software if its not working properly, as it has historically worked with over 98% uptime and I kept it maintained, and after 1/2 day of being behind you are talking about porting it to NOMP. Shameful.
Anyway, do whatever you want, its not going to work and Im not going to help code pieces of the core client to work with it, as the pool does a lot more than you think it does. It is also a hub for adding orphan features.
I need only alternative pool software to run in on Linux
Maybe I will try write something by myself and use getminingtemplate to prepare shares to send.
January 24, 2018, 10:21:00 AM
On other hand, C-CEX looks like it is going to pull a bitconnect.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418700.2860
Not faith in this exchange anymore.
PLEASE people can we find an exchange to list us? I suggested yobit and pool for the 0.1btc fee!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418700.2860
Not faith in this exchange anymore.
PLEASE people can we find an exchange to list us? I suggested yobit and pool for the 0.1btc fee!
January 24, 2018, 10:14:56 AM
Updated it to 1.0.8.6 this morning, after I realized you needed distinct versions.
Ah ok
I have uploaded 1.0.8.6 to Launchpad and it's compiling nowThanks! Just an FYI, Im going to have a 1087 out there in a half hour, but its only to add a block test harness to the client so we can glean insight into what the client is hashing on, if we adjust the timestamp to a grid (IE a snap to grid timestamp) and a 0 nonce. I just want to ensure that Client A, B, C are all hashing unique base blocks. So please disregard it.
So no need to update to 87?
January 24, 2018, 10:13:36 AM
Updated it to 1.0.8.6 this morning, after I realized you needed distinct versions.
Ah ok
I have uploaded 1.0.8.6 to Launchpad and it's compiling nowThanks! Just an FYI, Im going to have a 1087 out there in a half hour, but its only to add a block test harness to the client so we can glean insight into what the client is hashing on, if we adjust the timestamp to a grid (IE a snap to grid timestamp) and a 0 nonce. I just want to ensure that Client A, B, C are all hashing unique base blocks. So please disregard it.
January 24, 2018, 10:13:04 AM
The pool did find 4 or so blocks through the night.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
Ok, pool is paying again now and back payments paid. Sorry for the inconvenience, the large headers were really an unexpected change that impacted the pool side.
So right now I am looking back at our initiative to find why the pool is finding less and less, the imitative to provide distinct block templates and ensure the pool users are all hashing distinct work.
Also did you see the suggestion for getitng listed on yobit? what do you think? we can pool fees and pay back next superblock or i dont know how much is left in budget for this kind of stuff
I have added a feature into 1.0.8.5 that asks the miner to make a .01 cent BBP tx paid to yourself, in an attempt to make a distinct block template per miner. I will be adding a field to getmininginfo in about 30 minutes to test this out. I just wanted to make you all aware its there (when you receive a .01 cent tx to yourself when you find a block), it is to try to help us pool mine more efficiently.
I am also going back to One pool address (BNvQ5Txs1riZvuKA5W7prbtwx7PuSXXBwL) for the time being. I'm working hard to isolate the blockhash itself, to know for sure that each miner is doing unique work. Once we know for sure this is happening we can focus on other aspects.
Good news.
OK so I can push updates to all my miners now?
Hopefully we can get everything functional as before christmas Rob, it would be very nice.
As for the fraudster question, I ment the HK ip with the issues you mentioned about sending only half solutions or something like that. im not very technical in that aspect
Oh, OK sorry, I misinterpreted what you said, I apologize.
I thought you were saying the pool stole the money through the night, lol.
no problem, my apologies too for the bad sentence. I read it afterwards and it looked like it was directed to you.
Anyways thanks for update on pool all functional.
January 24, 2018, 10:10:34 AM
Updated it to 1.0.8.6 this morning, after I realized you needed distinct versions.
Ah ok
I have uploaded 1.0.8.6 to Launchpad and it's compiling now January 24, 2018, 10:10:12 AM
The pool did find 4 or so blocks through the night.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
Ok, pool is paying again now and back payments paid. Sorry for the inconvenience, the large headers were really an unexpected change that impacted the pool side.
So right now I am looking back at our initiative to find why the pool is finding less and less, the imitative to provide distinct block templates and ensure the pool users are all hashing distinct work.
Also did you see the suggestion for getitng listed on yobit? what do you think? we can pool fees and pay back next superblock or i dont know how much is left in budget for this kind of stuff
I have added a feature into 1.0.8.5 that asks the miner to make a .01 cent BBP tx paid to yourself, in an attempt to make a distinct block template per miner. I will be adding a field to getmininginfo in about 30 minutes to test this out. I just wanted to make you all aware its there (when you receive a .01 cent tx to yourself when you find a block), it is to try to help us pool mine more efficiently.
I am also going back to One pool address (BNvQ5Txs1riZvuKA5W7prbtwx7PuSXXBwL) for the time being. I'm working hard to isolate the blockhash itself, to know for sure that each miner is doing unique work. Once we know for sure this is happening we can focus on other aspects.
Good news.
OK so I can push updates to all my miners now?
Hopefully we can get everything functional as before christmas Rob, it would be very nice.
As for the fraudster question, I ment the HK ip with the issues you mentioned about sending only half solutions or something like that. im not very technical in that aspect
Oh, OK sorry, I misinterpreted what you said, I apologize.
I thought you were saying the pool stole the money through the night, lol.
January 24, 2018, 10:06:02 AM
To everyone talking about NOMP, if NOMP was possible I would have written the original pool in NOMP.
There are massive things missing. One there is no hash function in python that is going to get you the biblehash.
Two, there is no software (like cgminer or sgminer) that is going to interact with NOMP.
If you think I did that bad of a job with the pool, I think you should find another community.
Ill fix the pool software if its not working properly, as it has historically worked with over 98% uptime and I kept it maintained, and after 1/2 day of being behind you are talking about porting it to NOMP. Shameful.
Anyway, do whatever you want, its not going to work and Im not going to help code pieces of the core client to work with it, as the pool does a lot more than you think it does. It is also a hub for adding orphan features.
There are massive things missing. One there is no hash function in python that is going to get you the biblehash.
Two, there is no software (like cgminer or sgminer) that is going to interact with NOMP.
If you think I did that bad of a job with the pool, I think you should find another community.
Ill fix the pool software if its not working properly, as it has historically worked with over 98% uptime and I kept it maintained, and after 1/2 day of being behind you are talking about porting it to NOMP. Shameful.
Anyway, do whatever you want, its not going to work and Im not going to help code pieces of the core client to work with it, as the pool does a lot more than you think it does. It is also a hub for adding orphan features.
January 24, 2018, 10:02:35 AM
we need node multi hashing....
we can do proposal for it and paid for it €/$
owner of pool looks if he can add to his pools
we can do proposal for it and paid for it €/$
owner of pool looks if he can add to his pools
I will receive answer tonight from the guy
If some pool owner write it itself, and don't push code to github, then it will be only one who have mining software :/
BTW: half masternodes is in new version:
70715 49
70714 52
I added version distribution to https://biblepay.eu/
January 24, 2018, 10:02:18 AM
The pool did find 4 or so blocks through the night.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
Ok, pool is paying again now and back payments paid. Sorry for the inconvenience, the large headers were really an unexpected change that impacted the pool side.
So right now I am looking back at our initiative to find why the pool is finding less and less, the imitative to provide distinct block templates and ensure the pool users are all hashing distinct work.
Also did you see the suggestion for getitng listed on yobit? what do you think? we can pool fees and pay back next superblock or i dont know how much is left in budget for this kind of stuff
I have added a feature into 1.0.8.5 that asks the miner to make a .01 cent BBP tx paid to yourself, in an attempt to make a distinct block template per miner. I will be adding a field to getmininginfo in about 30 minutes to test this out. I just wanted to make you all aware its there (when you receive a .01 cent tx to yourself when you find a block), it is to try to help us pool mine more efficiently.
I am also going back to One pool address (BNvQ5Txs1riZvuKA5W7prbtwx7PuSXXBwL) for the time being. I'm working hard to isolate the blockhash itself, to know for sure that each miner is doing unique work. Once we know for sure this is happening we can focus on other aspects.
Good news.
OK so I can push updates to all my miners now?
Hopefully we can get everything functional as before christmas Rob, it would be very nice.
As for the fraudster question, I ment the HK ip with the issues you mentioned about sending only half solutions or something like that. im not very technical in that aspect
January 24, 2018, 10:01:34 AM
we need node multi hashing....
we can do proposal for it and paid for it €/$
owner of pool looks if he can add to his pools
we can do proposal for it and paid for it €/$
owner of pool looks if he can add to his pools
LOL, biblepay will never work that way. You need the full node to hash the KJV bible.
January 24, 2018, 09:59:34 AM
@Rob: The biblepay Homepage says there is a Version 1.0.8.6 available, but I can't find it in the git.
Should I build 1.0.8.5b for Ubuntu, or wait until 10.8.6 is in the git repo?
Updated it to 1.0.8.6 this morning, after I realized you needed distinct versions.Should I build 1.0.8.5b for Ubuntu, or wait until 10.8.6 is in the git repo?
January 24, 2018, 09:47:17 AM
The pool did find 4 or so blocks through the night.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
So basically more fraud on pool? Is that intended?
What do you mean by more fraud?
This is an ignoramous comment.
January 24, 2018, 09:46:15 AM
The pool did find 4 or so blocks through the night.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
The issue is that bug I was talking about yesterday, where we now have a much larger solution being posted also affected the payment system (thats a service on the pool).
Im debugging the issue now.
The pool will be fixed within an hour, from the looks of the problem it should be relatively easy to fix.
Ok, pool is paying again now and back payments paid. Sorry for the inconvenience, the large headers were really an unexpected change that impacted the pool side.
So right now I am looking back at our initiative to find why the pool is finding less and less, the imitative to provide distinct block templates and ensure the pool users are all hashing distinct work.
I have added a feature into 1.0.8.5 that asks the miner to make a .01 cent BBP tx paid to yourself, in an attempt to make a distinct block template per miner. I will be adding a field to getmininginfo in about 30 minutes to test this out. I just wanted to make you all aware its there (when you receive a .01 cent tx to yourself when you find a block), it is to try to help us pool mine more efficiently.
I am also going back to One pool address (BNvQ5Txs1riZvuKA5W7prbtwx7PuSXXBwL) for the time being. I'm working hard to isolate the blockhash itself, to know for sure that each miner is doing unique work. Once we know for sure this is happening we can focus on other aspects.
January 24, 2018, 09:41:29 AM
we need node multi hashing....
we can do proposal for it and paid for it €/$
owner of pool looks if he can add to his pools
we can do proposal for it and paid for it €/$
owner of pool looks if he can add to his pools
I will receive answer tonight from the guy
January 24, 2018, 09:26:57 AM
I have upgraded my wallet just now to 1.0.8.6, I just want to say I am mining at my usual rate if it helps the guys working hard.
Jump to: