It went up once
But it massively crashed twice during his presidency as well (to nearly 3k and 4k). So the net effect of his rule on Bitcoin prices remains to be evaluated and, most importantly, we should find out whether there is such an effect in the first place at all before we go any further
But what matters is the outcome, right?
That's the fun when you try to overlap things that have little to nothing in common.
Jumping from Trump to Obama the things get really really funny:
He started his presidency two weeks after the genesis block and ended his first term within at 20$.
Then in the second, he saw it go up to 1000 in the first year then drop the go close to the ATH.
So, his second term was way worse, but still a bit better than Trump, but following the trend, Biden would only bring an increase of a maximum of 5x during his term.
Why are we having these questions?
I don't think that the US has that much Bitcoin that could affect the current market that we have so even if Trump or Biden won, it will never be that positive or negative to affect the market.
Because the largest bitcoin company in terms of bitcoins in custody is in the US, because the largest funds that hold cryptos are from the US because most ATMs are in the US because most nodes are also there and in short that's where the money is.
And if the US changes its policy with a negative stance no good news from the other side will be able to cancel the negative effects.
