He is not looking to kill it, he is trying to impose the DAME tax, DAME means Digital Asset Mining Energy, and the idea is to start with this tax from 10%, then 20% in the next year and 30% on the 3rd year.
And each subsequent year increase the tax rate by 10% until it reaches 100%?
Why are such “privileged” conditions created for mining? For example, the oil production tax is 0.5% (Kentucky) - 12.5% (Alaska). I assume that this is only part of the tax burden, but certainly not a total of 30%. 30% is an extortionate interest rate.
So, the plan isn't to ban the mining, but with those huge taxes, no one will want to mine there. Is not a good business. But i don't think congress will let that tax come to live, and if it does, they will stop it before the 3rd year, because other way people will start creating illegal farms.
It looks like the US wants to “kick out” “non-environmentally friendly” mining from the country, but I think the real reason is the excessive greed of the regulator.
Either mining businesses will “flee” from the states, or will become completely illegal.
Tax it to death or ban it still = kill it in the USA no matter what.
Excessively high taxes will “strangle” any business. If a country wants to develop (attract) business in this direction, then they set a 0% tax rate. Look at the United Arab Emirates, where without their tax incentives not a single business would move, because who needs a desert. But now it's like a business mecca.
Sad thing is that it will cost people their jobs, be it miners, traders and exchanges that operate in the USA with either route they take.
These people will receive money through 10\20\30% taxes indirectly in the form of benefits, tax breaks and other things.
Here's the other sad thing, AI is power hungry too, as are all the data centers that we rely on for day to day things, Gov servers (IRS, Defence, police, DMV etc), traffic control systems, banking, the internet and all the servers and routers and network switches and distribution nodes for the cables in the sea and on land that we rely on day to day for the internet to work.
Why single out BTC / crypto with it's electric consumption ?
And I'm of the same opinion. It looks like discrimination, because this is a business like everything else.