Good idea. But the SEC wont be happy if you make those decisions lol.
A big part of why Bisq is a DAO is so that it doesn't care what the SEC, or any other government agency says.
Today we saw even
Shapeshift.io give in to KYC/AML regulation. I know Erik... he hates KYC regulation. He fought it for years and even blocked from using Shapeshift.io any jurisdiction that enforced user data collection....
So why is he giving in now?
Because when you run a company you have a responsibility to your employees and investors. You cannot ignore legal risks and if you want to do any business in the Western world you cannot ignore US judges and US regulations. Even if you are based in Switzerland.
We believe that a DAO like Bisq (or like Bitcoin) based on FOSS can be more resilient. I'm sure it will be put to the test!
I think what Bisq does or wants to do better is still not really understood by people. If we keep Bitcoin and crypto trading and exchanging the way they were originally envisioned, which is P2P, and strictly without external involvement, then it doesn't matter what any agency says or does. We've already seen now how state restrictions, regional sanctions and embargoes have attempted to stop transactions - and faillng. Might stifle growth somewhat but if people find out they can use solutions like Bisq for safer, more private exchanges... eventually the governments will realise that too.
I was just saying in a separate thread how the Shapeshift move seems incredible ill-advised. But yes, it's more to do with the company's direction (we saw already how Shapeshift helped enforcement stop the movement of stolen funds and that's great but it sets a precedent).
You're right too - no DAO is immune, but we have had a good plenty of times to see it being put to the test at least with Bitcoin. Let's see how Bisq holds up!