Topic: [BIT-X.com] [CoinsBank.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign - page 278. (Read 554255 times)

If someone has a valid concern and brings it to the attention of the owner of bit-x then the owner of bit-x is going to have the final say. It is their money right?
I am saying to ignore insubstantial trades
correct

I have gotten a bot developed and will be using this to check and count user posts.

Check the google doc just for your name.

Thank you for writing this out, I would have said something like this too.

This month I will try my best to make things fair and either be tough on everyone or allow all posts (even spam ones) through (which I don't want).

As I have said, there will be users who get past and may get a few more posts counted while others might be caught and their post count reduced. This should serve as a lesson to not spam.

Wrong, what I say in this campaign goes. If I decide a user will not be allowed in, they will not be allowed in.

So you're basically asking to ignore all positive trust, got it.


There is one 'dispute' due to one user not being happy with his supposed lower payout and his jealously of another user ("why didn't you do this to that user and only me.." type stuff)

you need to provide proofs what you are saying without proofs its pizza without cheese and even tho having multiple accounts is not aggainest this forums rules and even i dont think so that account is own by marco

I have never been in nor am I in control of the account 'LOBSTER'.

Single image posts unless somehow relevant and helpful to the discussion are regarded as spam and won't be counted (there weren't any useful ones in this case).

Of course, as can be expected, I have missed some disqualified posts in all members' posting (finftp most likely has many more disqualified as with LOBSTER).

This rule wasn't changed during the term. It just happened that the posts that weren't counted were in that thread mostly.

So to make it clear. You've accepted that some of your posts were not counted and now your goal is to get Lobster kicked out from campaign or get his earning reduced?

Do I get this right? Is this what you're trying to do?

True, and therefor I made the discussion easier because it would end up in an endless discussion otherwise:

One of the rules:
Those who post the majority of their posts in a few days then stop posting will be denied payment

Number 1 poster LOBSTER did not the majority but all 466 posts in the first 6 days. Period.

Doesn't matter whether it's a text, single image, gif or whatever. Posts must be constructive. Period.

What is constructive and what isn't is subjective, and in every sig campaign (that pays for post) it's down to campaign manager to decide.

You shouldn't expect the manager to go through every single post of every participant and evaluate on its constructiveness every time someone feels mistreated. That's practically impossible and not gonna happen.

If you don't feel your input is appreciated, switch campaigns. It's that simple.

I personally think that a lot of posts from some of the top 10 posters (don't want to point fingers) are far from being 'constructive', and if those were excluded I would likely made it to the top 10. But I do realise that it's close to impossible to evaluate every post in proper context.

You are wrong here. Marco is essentially acting as an employee in managing and paying out for their signature campaign. Going to bit-x would be very similar to to someone escalating a dispute to someone's boss. If he did escalate to bit-x, got payment from them and them marco were to remove him from the signature campaign he could simply do the same thing again, which would likely result in him being reinstated back in the campaign.

Most of marco's trust feedback is either from trading gift cards in small amounts or because he lent people bitcoin without collateral (this is probably not appropriate for him to receive trust). If you were to exclude these ratings, along with the ratings he received from paying out on the signature deal then he would have a trade with caution warning because he sold his signature twice.

If there are a lot of disputes that escalate to bit-x then the more likely scenario is that marco would be removed from his position of managing the signature campaign

No, they pay Marco because he is trusted and knows how to use his judgment properly. They don't want, nor have the time to deal with payouts and running the campaign, hence the reason for choosing such a qualified, trustworthy individual.
He may make oversights, if so, I'm sure he'd be happy to correct them. But, I highly doubt complaining and nagging and running to the exchange will work out favorably...and if it did, I'd think Marco would more than likely remove such a person from this campaign in future months.

I ultimately will have to I guess. I just give him the chance to correct the issue first

In reference to the single image posts, there is currently nothing in the rules that state that single image posts are not allowed. Therefore there is no reason why single image posts should be excluded (unless they are in a thread that is otherwise excluded).

It is known that marco has a large number of accounts in his control so it is possible that LOBSTER is under marco's own control (meaning he owns it). This would explain his disregard for the rules with this person.

I would personally go to bit-x at this point seeking payment. This is not marco's signature campaign, it is bit-x's and marco is only acting as escrow, bit-x is ultimately responsible if marco does not pay

Hello! Just a reminder marco
My name hasn't been updated in GoogleDocs yet

And the problem even becomes worse.


It was actually 0,5992BTC what was paid because he was number one.

Number one poster LOBSTER did not only post all of his 466 posts in 6 days:

37 of them were in german so are rejected without discussion.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10038552 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10037269 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10036390 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10035524 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10035181 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10034848 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032753 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032257 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10027784 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10027282 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10025868 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10021198 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10021152 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10020736 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10020664 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10016423 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10022585 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10022526 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10022510 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10022423 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10023997 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10011044 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10011030 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10010867 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10010561 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10006506 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10005986 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9978481 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9975854 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9974137 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9968444 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10012537 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10005310 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9992279 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9983519 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9982597 German
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10010658 One more german!


At least 5 of them are in this thread and therefor also rejected without discussion:


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10015941 Signature campaing thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10013506 Signature campaing thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10013462 Signature campaing thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9986629 Signature campaing thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9984778 Signature campaing thread


So that makes 42 total rejected posts without any point of discussion about the rules whatsoever.


So, since there were 50 rejected posts total, there must be 8 more.
I have reviewed all the posts and these remaining 50 are just as doubtful as the ones you posted for me.



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10038309 2 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10037972 4 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10037953 6 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10037517 1 number
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10034978 3 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10034741 3 words and a number
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10033293 6 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10033077 4 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10033073 7 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10033047 2 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032946 7 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032764 4 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032655 4 words and a picture
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032608 8 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032601 1 sentence
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032562 5 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10032541 8 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10028000 1 word, 1 number
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10027799 5 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10027756 3 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10027733 1 picture
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10027572 6 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10027538 4 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10026887 8 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10026867 5 words and a picture
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10025972 7 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10025805 3 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10024786 3 words and a number
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10024695 1 word
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10022587 8 words and a number
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10021232 6 words, 3 numbers
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10016058 1 sentence
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10013117 5 words, 1 number
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10012036 7 words and an image
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10011868 2 whole sentences, this might be a legit "constructive post", my bad.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10005392 4 numbers
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10004652 1 hyperlink
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10003366 2 short sentences, this might also be a legit "constructive post", my bad.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10002825 4 words, 1 number.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10002122 4 words, 1 number.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10002037 a bit of nonsense
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10001298 5 words and an image
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10001172 4 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10000770 4 words and a number
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9997740 8 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9993734 3 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9992592 3 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9987839 1 word, 1 picture
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9982575 6 words
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9967178 1 word


So you tell me at least 42 of these were actually approved?

Please correct the issue.

First of all, I never expect to have all my posts accepted.
There is no rule which says single image posts are not allowed.

Some links you quote contains a single image which I made to point out to other people points in the trend where we currently are.
95% or more of the pictures I post are made by myself.
Some are only ment to be funny (and could be rejected, I kind of understand, but if they are on topic, why?), some are trend forecasts of which I am right once in a while.
It happens a lot in that thread that people give trend forecasts with or without pictures.
Some people even thank me for that.
You cannot call that a low quality post. A correct forecast in a speculation thread is a high quality post, whether it is text or image doesn't matter, the rules don't require text.
I can go and discuss all the quoted links but we will probably end up in an endless discussion so first I want to point another very important issue.

It is a measurable rule in the OP where you say: "Do not post the majority of your posts in a few days, post consistently. Those who post the majority of their posts in a few days then stop posting will be denied payment."

This rule was greatly breached by number 1 poster LOBSTER. He posted 466 posts in 6 days  
He started at 28 December 2014 and made NO posts after 04 January 2015

But he still was paid for almost all, and also got the 0,1 btc extra. Please explain.

You can say anything about my posts, and it's all personal judgement (I don't want to go there yet), but you cannot say this fits into the rules. it just cannot.
Therefor I really feel the rules are NOT followed and are different from person to person.
This is unacceptable.

I don't like to talk about other people but I just want to point out the that rules are taken with a grain of salt.  

This feeling became even stronger when you say two different things just right after each other  :



So what is the rule? Allowed or not allowed?  

I want to do this according the rules, but the rules are changed during the game and that is unfair to say the least.





I'm still butthurt

Thanks marco, you're a good & fair guy.

The Bit-X platform is an interesting one with a variety of cool features, and I will definitely be keeping tabs on it.

I appreciate the offer, and I will keep the Bit-X sig. up for free until I add another signature. I will probably add a personal signature next, but I will definitely reach out to you & the Bit-X campaign first if I join another organized campaign.

Thanks,
snarlpill

you need to verify the number to create the account. It is impossible to create an account with an invalid number(I still have the SMS's I received to create my account).

I'm making an exception for you SnarlPill . The trust isn't a necessary factor.

0.04BTC has been sent to your BIT-X address: https://blockchain.info/tx/9c1d8a591bc6ae702288f21fd5ef7341098d67e8d367396346b1dea4e4a033fa

If you'd like, you can keep the signature and re-enrol at a later date when you can post again.