From Merriam-Webster:
Full Definition of PROOF
1
a : the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact
Topic: [BitAffNet] How we're the #1 Bitcoin Mining Pool In The World (or so we thought) - page 35. (Read 99088 times)
February 09, 2015, 02:35:19 PM
February 09, 2015, 02:29:20 PM
Damn those meddling kids....... 
Miners on BAN - s0br is scamming you & has been doing so long before I opened a scam accusation against him last year. YOU ARE LOSING YOUR HARD EARNED BTC!!!!
When leaving this pool, please ensure that you leave negative feedback on the profiles of both s0br & ThePhwner to warn others & ensure that no other miners will be ripped off by this lying, thieving & scamming pool!!
Always research any future pool you intend to use to ensure that you are trusting a reputable pool operator & admin.
Good luck!!
Miners on BAN - s0br is scamming you & has been doing so long before I opened a scam accusation against him last year. YOU ARE LOSING YOUR HARD EARNED BTC!!!!
When leaving this pool, please ensure that you leave negative feedback on the profiles of both s0br & ThePhwner to warn others & ensure that no other miners will be ripped off by this lying, thieving & scamming pool!!
Always research any future pool you intend to use to ensure that you are trusting a reputable pool operator & admin.
Good luck!!
GASP... no... not
NEGATIVE FEEDBACK
Maybe, just maybe, one day, you'll see that there is life outside this forum. Probably not but maybe. But hey, keep patting yourself on the back, you've done a "...Really" good job here, including bringing out some of your own schills, who have been silent for months, yet always seem to emerge when you do.
The problem with delusional, paranoid, unloved dipshits like you is that you assume people are out to get you, when sometimes they're just not very good at what they do and things go badly. That whole "omission vs. commission" business. For anything you say to be even remotely true, it would have to mean that multiple people set out to deliberately lie, cheat, and steal, when the more likely answer is that NONE of that happened and they just had a bad business model.
I'm back to feeling sad for you... the world isn't always as fucked up as you seem to think it is. Maybe you can use all your piles of BTC to pay a nice "escort" to give you a big hug. After all, you are the king of this forum.
February 09, 2015, 01:02:27 PM
Damn those meddling kids.......
Miners on BAN - s0br is scamming you & has been doing so long before I opened a scam accusation against him last year. YOU ARE LOSING YOUR HARD EARNED BTC!!!!
When leaving this pool, please ensure that you leave negative feedback on the profiles of both s0br & ThePhwner to warn others & ensure that no other miners will be ripped off by this lying, thieving & scamming pool!!
Always research any future pool you intend to use to ensure that you are trusting a reputable pool operator & admin.
Good luck!!
Miners on BAN - s0br is scamming you & has been doing so long before I opened a scam accusation against him last year. YOU ARE LOSING YOUR HARD EARNED BTC!!!!
When leaving this pool, please ensure that you leave negative feedback on the profiles of both s0br & ThePhwner to warn others & ensure that no other miners will be ripped off by this lying, thieving & scamming pool!!
Always research any future pool you intend to use to ensure that you are trusting a reputable pool operator & admin.
Good luck!!
February 09, 2015, 12:37:57 PM
If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding. Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change. Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate. Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time). This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.
OR, s0br is adjusting the payouts manually in line with the diff change in the vain hope that his miners won't notice - & if they do, put it down to diff change & say nothing.......
update miner_shares set share_value='0.00000000056236';
commit;
He would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for those meddling kids!
February 09, 2015, 12:31:23 PM
If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding. Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change. Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate. Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time). This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.
OR, s0br is adjusting the payouts manually in line with the diff change in the vain hope that his miners won't notice - & if they do, put it down to diff change & say nothing.......
February 09, 2015, 12:23:11 PM
If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding. Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change. Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate. Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time). This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.
No offence taken. I agree completely and am looking for a new pool now. From my perspective it looks like BAN is 5 blocks behind and has been selecting who to pay out to (the small balances) for a week now fully knowing that larger balances were going to end up into the higher difficulty.
February 09, 2015, 12:18:06 PM
If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding. Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change. Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate. Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time). This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.
February 09, 2015, 12:09:05 PM
If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding. Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change. Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate. Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time). This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.
February 09, 2015, 12:05:19 PM
Oh dear - are the wheels finally falling off s0br's little scam wagon?........ 
February 09, 2015, 11:57:33 AM
If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding. Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change. Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.
February 09, 2015, 11:50:58 AM
Pending payouts were just REDUCED as if we have been mining at the new higher difficulty since last payouts
Which looks like outright theft to me
I just checked mine and it is down as well! No payment for over a week and now 7.71% of it is gone! I may as well have been mining a 4% PPS pool-- I would have come out ahead.
February 09, 2015, 11:46:20 AM
Which looks like outright theft to me
It is & it has been since day one I'm afraid.........
February 09, 2015, 11:42:37 AM
Pending payouts were just REDUCED as if we have been mining at the new higher difficulty since last payouts
Which looks like outright theft to me
February 09, 2015, 11:35:07 AM
I stopped mining here because the payouts just takes to long.
It has been over a week now, and now it has decreased in value.
It has been over a week now, and now it has decreased in value.
Yup, that's how it goes here I'm afraid. Thank you for your mining donation to s0brs scam pool. Which ever pool you decide to go to, be sure to do a little research first to make sure you don't get screwed over again by other scammers.
LULZ - look who's back, the faker himself........
Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.
What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......
So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.
I can vouch for that fact that BAN paid Minersource for these units.
Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.
What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......
As long as you're verifying facts, its been well known that I resigned from BAN some time ago.
So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.
Swear, swear, rant, swear etc, etc, blah blah........
Thank you for clarifying that you can't produce the documented proof requested. Again.
Your diuretic mish-mash clearly demonstrates to every BAN miner getting shafted by s0br that your "vouch" is worthless.
February 09, 2015, 11:03:04 AM
I think my pending payout just went down, because of the difficulty increase.
I stopped mining here because the payouts just takes to long.
It has been over a week now, and now it has decreased in value.
I stopped mining here because the payouts just takes to long.
It has been over a week now, and now it has decreased in value.
February 09, 2015, 09:49:28 AM
LULZ - look who's back, the faker himself........
Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.
What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......
So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.
I can vouch for that fact that BAN paid Minersource for these units.
Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.
What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......
As long as you're verifying facts, its been well known that I resigned from BAN some time ago.
So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.
On the condition that you'll choke on a bag of rotten cocks...
Just because I don't work for him doesn't mean he isn't a decent guy and that you're not full of shit. Something like 10 pounds of shit in a 5 pound sack. Feel free to convert to kilograms if you're into that sort of thing. We're all still waiting on your forensic analysis of those faked pictures. And "Really" who the fuck is still butthurt over an S3?
Nice thing about the Internet, you don't actually control it like you do the voices in your head, the unicorns you draw on your Etch-A-Sketch, or the amt of vaseline you use for the 10x daily ritual... and people can post as they please. And I'll continue to do so while I watch you dig for "the truth" in the most ineffective and comical way possible.
So please, go on to explain how I am "Really" just s0br in disguise. If both of your hands are free...
February 08, 2015, 10:12:05 PM
LULZ - look who's back, the faker himself........
Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.
What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......
So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.
I can vouch for that fact that BAN paid Minersource for these units.
Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.
What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......
As long as you're verifying facts, its been well known that I resigned from BAN some time ago.
So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.
February 08, 2015, 07:13:19 PM
Well Black Arrow delivered the gear more then a little bit late the date is 2014 Oct.
It was due a lot sooner. So if they never got paid for it fuck Black Arrow.
I will reveal that I lost about 500 of 1800 paid to minersource for black arrow gear in a DzCoop group buy the gear was due in Feb Not Oct. I have 0 sympathy for Black Arrow.
Back to BAN I stopped mining here due to very slow payments. I am now paid up to date.
I would support BAN if I knew they would pay on time. I also would feel if they really stole from Black Arrow and that helped me to recover the money I lost to Black Arrow cool. The problem is BAN has been too slow to pay.
I have 14th and if mine for 1 week I earn a coin with that. I do not want to lose a coin to BAN due to lack of payments.
Normally, no. This checks out though, follow the link supplied by them - here's the delivery confirmation, signed for by J Kerrigan - & I know who that person is
It was due a lot sooner. So if they never got paid for it fuck Black Arrow.
I will reveal that I lost about 500 of 1800 paid to minersource for black arrow gear in a DzCoop group buy the gear was due in Feb Not Oct. I have 0 sympathy for Black Arrow.
Back to BAN I stopped mining here due to very slow payments. I am now paid up to date.
I would support BAN if I knew they would pay on time. I also would feel if they really stole from Black Arrow and that helped me to recover the money I lost to Black Arrow cool. The problem is BAN has been too slow to pay.
I have 14th and if mine for 1 week I earn a coin with that. I do not want to lose a coin to BAN due to lack of payments.
You want me to believe Black Arrow?
Normally, no. This checks out though, follow the link supplied by them - here's the delivery confirmation, signed for by J Kerrigan - & I know who that person is
Not to mention this troll douche's "investigation" is one-sided as always. Whatever happened between BA and Minersource is between two real shitheads that deserve each other. I can vouch for that fact that BAN paid Minersource for these units.
February 08, 2015, 07:11:39 PM
February 08, 2015, 11:29:47 AM
How many days of not finding a block is considered bad luck? I think it's been three days now?
Any time it takes more than the expected number of shares to solve a block, it's bad luck. Until the next difficulty change, that is 41,272,873,894 shares. Jump to: