Talking to himself. lol. This is hilarious.
Topic: BitBay |Decentralized Marketplace|Smart Contracts|IoT Tech|Markets Open - page 111. (Read 339485 times)
December 08, 2014, 07:03:34 AM
BonTonPlease = AltcoinUK
Talking to himself. lol. This is hilarious.
Talking to himself. lol. This is hilarious.
December 08, 2014, 07:02:29 AM
Who said that the team are scammers? Why start something great and not have the balls to get it done as team? Crypto people are all children i suggest.
December 08, 2014, 06:51:06 AM
As i always said. People are getting payed to tell lies. If you don't believe it watch trollbox on btc-e 
.
. 
December 08, 2014, 06:49:55 AM
AltcoinUK's position makes absolutely sense.
Also, Zimbeck's puts his reputation completely at risk. This "I am only a contractor" shit makes me totally laugh. A person of his gage would definitely want to know who he is working for unless he is involved in that scam himself. Of course, in the internet contracting pretty often works anonymously. But if you have a serious reputation overall, you would still be very careful before accepting a role as a developer only for highly shady people.
If this goes to zero, I'll spread the word about Mr. Zimbeck in a way very different from what I spread about him in the past.
Also, Zimbeck's puts his reputation completely at risk. This "I am only a contractor" shit makes me totally laugh. A person of his gage would definitely want to know who he is working for unless he is involved in that scam himself. Of course, in the internet contracting pretty often works anonymously. But if you have a serious reputation overall, you would still be very careful before accepting a role as a developer only for highly shady people.
If this goes to zero, I'll spread the word about Mr. Zimbeck in a way very different from what I spread about him in the past.
He is doing work on what he is getting paid. I fail to see what wrong he did.
December 08, 2014, 06:49:04 AM
AltcoinUK's position makes absolutely sense.
Also, Zimbeck's puts his reputation completely at risk. This "I am only a contractor" shit makes me totally laugh. A person of his gage would definitely want to know who he is working for unless he is involved in that scam himself. Of course, in the internet contracting pretty often works anonymously. But if you have a serious reputation overall, you would still be very careful before accepting a role as a developer only for highly shady people.
If this goes to zero, I'll spread the word about Mr. Zimbeck in a way very different from what I spread about him in the past.
Also, Zimbeck's puts his reputation completely at risk. This "I am only a contractor" shit makes me totally laugh. A person of his gage would definitely want to know who he is working for unless he is involved in that scam himself. Of course, in the internet contracting pretty often works anonymously. But if you have a serious reputation overall, you would still be very careful before accepting a role as a developer only for highly shady people.
If this goes to zero, I'll spread the word about Mr. Zimbeck in a way very different from what I spread about him in the past.
Given the fact that you have a newb account, under what name did you spread it before
December 08, 2014, 06:48:05 AM
December 08, 2014, 06:46:11 AM
Its seems as if a few people had questions about configuring the wallet. Just take a look at your receive tab. You can use bitmessage or encrypted email. Every page has a question mark that describes whats going on the page. If your bitmessage address isnt showing then PM me. Otherwise, you can use one or the other. If you send to a bitmessage address for contracts, the program automatically uses the address loaded in your receive tab. If you send to an email address, the program will use whatever email address you have loaded.
The list of approved email providers is listed if you hit the question mark. I usually just make a new gmail since its only used for communicating contract data. Let me know if you have any more questions thanks.
The list of approved email providers is listed if you hit the question mark. I usually just make a new gmail since its only used for communicating contract data. Let me know if you have any more questions thanks.
In Blackhalo this receive address is the original wallet address. That seems much more convenient than having to set bitmessage first.
It seems like I missed that post.
David, How long does it take for smart contract to go through? It has been numerous hours but it still says broadcasting. Any idea?
December 08, 2014, 06:43:02 AM
Its seems as if a few people had questions about configuring the wallet. Just take a look at your receive tab. You can use bitmessage or encrypted email. Every page has a question mark that describes whats going on the page. If your bitmessage address isnt showing then PM me. Otherwise, you can use one or the other. If you send to a bitmessage address for contracts, the program automatically uses the address loaded in your receive tab. If you send to an email address, the program will use whatever email address you have loaded.
The list of approved email providers is listed if you hit the question mark. I usually just make a new gmail since its only used for communicating contract data. Let me know if you have any more questions thanks.
The list of approved email providers is listed if you hit the question mark. I usually just make a new gmail since its only used for communicating contract data. Let me know if you have any more questions thanks.
In Blackhalo this receive address is the original wallet address. That seems much more convenient than having to set bitmessage first.
December 08, 2014, 06:42:22 AM
Mr Zimbeck dumps the coins that he bought from the IPO. That's what I think... Nobody in the world would dump such amounts at a loss.
Who is Mr. Zimbeck
This is normal selling as they investors who caught caught up seeing the ICO sell so fast didn't realise it was overpriced.
Zimbeck is not selling. The organizers of this scam are selling. Zimbeck just a developer, contracted by the scammers.
Thats all fine, who is Zimbeck? I haven't heard of him before today.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=david+zimbeck
December 08, 2014, 06:37:56 AM
AltcoinUK, I must commend you on being stubborn as a mule. How about you leave your computer alone for a while bud? I know your parents are rich as fck but for how long you gonna keep using their free internet to spread your Fud?
I know you lost your lunch money in VIA but that's not the end of the world.
Get a job, you idiot.
I know you lost your lunch money in VIA but that's not the end of the world.
Get a job, you idiot.
December 08, 2014, 06:35:59 AM
the problem is that at least 5-6 names in this thread belong to one or more pure scammers. These guys coordinate the conversation with the purpose of getting more people buying into their dumps.
You are too conservative with the 5-6 names estimations. At least 50% of the accounts that post here to support this desperate scam are the secondary, third and newbie nicks of the scammers.
As I can read above, finally there are rational people point out that only the Bitbay team who bought into their own ICO has the incentive to dump at 100 satoshies, and the newbie nicks just try to trick people into this obvious scam.
More in the unmoderated thread at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitbay-decentralized-marketplace-unmoderated-thread-857457
its pretty obvious
but what is the point of explaining this to sheeps? let's all just make money Well, it's a personal choice. We are all here for the dollar, but personally I don't like to make money with scammers. Besides that, there's not much money here, Bob & Co. won't able to pump this thing, in my opinion hard to make money here, not even with swing trades.
I will have to disagree. There is still some money in swing trades. like 0.2btc or half a btc a day. Its not bad.
But there is possibility that they might pump it a bit so they can sell every last coin. December 08, 2014, 06:33:33 AM
the problem is that at least 5-6 names in this thread belong to one or more pure scammers. These guys coordinate the conversation with the purpose of getting more people buying into their dumps.
You are too conservative with the 5-6 names estimations. At least 50% of the accounts that post here to support this desperate scam are the secondary, third and newbie nicks of the scammers.
As I can read above, finally there are rational people point out that only the Bitbay team who bought into their own ICO has the incentive to dump at 100 satoshies, and the newbie nicks just try to trick people into this obvious scam.
More in the unmoderated thread at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitbay-decentralized-marketplace-unmoderated-thread-857457
its pretty obvious
but what is the point of explaining this to sheeps? let's all just make money Well, it's a personal choice. We are all here for the dollar, but personally I don't like to make money with scammers. Besides that, there's not much money here, Bob & Co. won't able to pump this thing, in my opinion hard to make money here, not even with swing trades.
December 08, 2014, 06:31:52 AM
Mr Zimbeck dumps the coins that he bought from the IPO. That's what I think... Nobody in the world would dump such amounts at a loss.
Who is Mr. Zimbeck
This is normal selling as they investors who caught caught up seeing the ICO sell so fast didn't realise it was overpriced.
Zimbeck is not selling. The organizers of this scam are selling. Zimbeck just a developer, contracted by the scammers.
Thats all fine, who is Zimbeck? I haven't heard of him before today.
December 08, 2014, 06:22:19 AM
round 2 of fud
December 08, 2014, 06:19:40 AM
Mr Zimbeck dumps the coins that he bought from the IPO. That's what I think... Nobody in the world would dump such amounts at a loss.
Who is Mr. Zimbeck
This is normal selling as they investors who caught caught up seeing the ICO sell so fast didn't realise it was overpriced.
December 08, 2014, 06:09:48 AM
Strange dump-wave. Bought 2nd time Bay at 108. We'll see.
Btw. I still think dev should put buywall 10% of ICO to help stay at "stable" level.
Btw. I still think dev should put buywall 10% of ICO to help stay at "stable" level.
no, there should be no buy walls by devs.
December 08, 2014, 06:07:40 AM
Or they could use those funds to develop the functions that really give this coin it's value. In a way a floor set by them essentially means they'd put their business on sale. Long term investors would never stand for a company doing that in real life, so why are people expecting such a thing for a coin under development?
"Focus on money and we will make money. Focus on impact and we will make an impact."
Simon Sinek
"Focus on money and we will make money. Focus on impact and we will make an impact."
Simon Sinek
December 08, 2014, 05:48:32 AM
Strange dump-wave. Bought 2nd time Bay at 108. We'll see.
Btw. I still think dev should put buywall 10% of ICO to help stay at "stable" level.
Btw. I still think dev should put buywall 10% of ICO to help stay at "stable" level.
December 08, 2014, 05:46:49 AM
bought another 3BTC 2.5mil coins!!!!
this is sick i am very happy person i am finished for now i have bought more then enough hahaha
cu you all in January xD
this is sick i am very happy person i am finished for now i have bought more then enough hahaha
cu you all in January xD
You lucky guy, i wanted to instantly buy bitcoin at litebit.eu with sofort payment, but they ran out of BTC
. Normally you get your bitcoin within half an hour there . December 08, 2014, 05:41:46 AM
bought another 3BTC 2.5mil coins!!!!
this is sick i am very happy person i am finished for now i have bought more then enough hahaha
cu you all in January xD
this is sick i am very happy person i am finished for now i have bought more then enough hahaha
cu you all in January xD
Jump to: